Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 978040, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/978040
Research Article

A Straight-Line Method for Analyzing Residual Drawdowns at an Observation Well

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Süleyman Demirel University, 32260 Isparta, Turkey

Received 20 March 2015; Revised 21 May 2015; Accepted 25 May 2015

Academic Editor: Zdeněk Kala

Copyright © 2015 Mesut Çimen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. V. Theis, “The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage,” Transactions, American Geophysical Union, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 519–524, 1935. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. Z. Şen, Applied Hydrogeology for Scientists and Engineers, CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  3. V. Batu, Aquifer Hydraulics: A Comprehensive Guide to Hydrogeologic Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  4. H. H. Cooper and C. E. Jacob, “A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well-field history,” Transactions, American Geophysical Union, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 526–534, 1946. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. C. E. Jacob, “The recovery method for determining the coefficient of transmissibility,” in Methods of Determining Permeability, Transmissibility and Drawdown, USGS Water Supply Paper 1536-I, pp. 283–292, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Bruin and H. E. Hudson, Selected Methods for Pumping Test Analysis, Report of Investigation no. 25, Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, Ill, USA, 1955.
  7. USDI, Ground Water Manual, US Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Washington, DC, USA, 1981.
  8. C. M. Case, W. W. Pidcoe, and P. R. Fenske, “Theis equation analysis of residual drawdown data,” Water Resources Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1253–1256, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. G. Agarwal, “A new method to account for producing time effects when drawdown type curves are used to analyze pressure buildup and other test data,” in Proceedings of the 55th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper 9289, 1980.
  10. H. J. Ramey, “A drawdown and build-up type curve for interference testing,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Invitational Well-Testing Symposium, T. W. Doc and W. J. Schwarz, Eds., pp. 130–134, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 1980.
  11. G. C. Mishra and A. G. Chachadi, “Analysis of flow to a large-diameter well during the recovery period,” Ground Water, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 646–651, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Z. Şen, “Drawdown distribution during recovery around a large diameter well,” Nordic Hydrology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 253–264, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H.-D. Yeh and C.-T. Wang, “A semianalytical solution for residual drawdown at a finite diameter well in a confined aquifer,” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 966–972, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. J. Goode, “Composite recovery type curves in normalized time from Theis' exact solution,” Ground Water, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 672–678, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. N. Ballukraya and K. K. Sharma, “Estimation of storativity from recovery data,” Ground Water, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 495–498, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. O. Banton and L. M. Bangoy, “A new method to determine storage coefficient from pumping test recovery data,” Ground Water, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 772–777, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. K. Singh, “Storage coefficient and transmissivity from residual drawdowns,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 129, no. 8, pp. 637–644, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Zheng, J.-Q. Guo, and Y. Lei, “An improved straight-line fitting method for analyzing pumping test recovery data,” Ground Water, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 939–942, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. K. Singh, “Identification of aquifer parameters from residual drawdowns: an optimization approach,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1139–1148, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Samani, M. Pasandi, and D. A. Barry, “Characterizing a heterogeneous aquifer by derivative analysis of pumping and recovery test data,” Journal of Geological Society of Iran, vol. 1, pp. 29–41, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  21. B. V. N. P. Kambhammettu and J. P. King, “Estimation of aquifer parameters from residual drawdowns,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Water Management, vol. 163, no. 7, pp. 361–365, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Ashjari, “Determination of storage coefficients during pumping and recovery,” GroundWater, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 122–127, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus