Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 980652, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/980652
Research Article

Efficient Formulation of the Periodic Corrections in Brouwer’s Gravity Solution

Instituto de Ciencia y Technologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Talim 330, 12231-280 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil

Received 16 March 2015; Accepted 10 August 2015

Academic Editor: Stefan Balint

Copyright © 2015 Martin Lara. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. R. Hoots and R. L. Roehrich, “Models for propagation of the NORAD element sets,” Project SPACETRACK Report 3, U.S. Air Force Aerospace Defense Command, Colorado Springs, Colo, USA, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. Brouwer, “Solution of the problem of artificial satellite theory without drag,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 64, pp. 378–397, 1959. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. F. R. Hoots, P. W. Schumacher Jr., and R. A. Glover, “History of analytical orbit modeling in the U.S. space surveillance system,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 174–185, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. A. Vallado, P. Crawford, R. Hujsak, and T. S. Kelso, “Revisiting spacetrack report #3 (AIAA 2006-6753),” in Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-Located Conferences, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Keystone, Colo, USA, August 2006.
  5. T. J. Kelso and S. Alfano, “Satellite orbital conjunction reports assessing threatening encounters in space (SOCRATES) (AAS 05-124),” in Proceedings of the AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Conference, American Astronautical Society, Univelt, Copper Mountain, Colo, USA, 2005.
  6. T. J. Kelso, “Analysis of the iridium 33-cosmos 2251 collision,” Paper AAS 09-368, American Astronautical Society. American Astronautical Society, Univelt, Escondido, Calif, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. Hall, S. Alfano, and A. Ocampo, “Advances in satellite conjunction analysis,” in Proceedings of the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference (AMOS '10), Maui, Hawaii, USA, September 2010.
  8. T. J. Kelso, “Validation of SGP4 and IS-GPS-200D against GPS precision ephemerides (AAS 07-127),” in Proceedings of the 17th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Conference, American Astronautical Society, Univelt, Sedona, Ariz, USA, 2007, https://celestrak.com/publications/AAS/07-127/AAS-07-127.pdf.
  9. P. F. Easthope, “Examination of SGP4 along-track errors for initially circular orbits,” IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 554–568, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. H. Fraysse, C. Le Fevre, V. Morand, F. Deleflie, P. Mercier, and C. Dental, “STELA, a tool for long term orbit propagation,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and Techniques (ICATT '12), ESTEC/ESA, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, May 2012.
  11. H. von Zeipel, “July 1916, 1917, 1918. Research on the motion of minor planets (recherches sur le mouvement des petites planètes),” NASA Translation NASA TT F-9445, 1965, https://archive.org/details/nasa_techdoc_19650019998. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Ferraz-Mello, Canonical Perturbation Theories—Degenerate Systems and Resonance, vol. 345 of Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
  13. R. H. Lyddane, “Small eccentricities or inclinations in the Brouwer theory of the artificial satellite,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 68, pp. 555–558, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. F. R. Hoots, “Reformulation of the Brouwer geopotential theory for improved computational efficiency,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 367–375, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Kozai, “Second-order solution of artificial satellite theory without air drag,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 446–461, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. I. G. Izsak, “A note on perturbation theory,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 68, pp. 559–561, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. K. Aksnes, “On the use of the hill variables in artificial satellite theory,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 17, pp. 70–75, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Lara, “On inclination resonances in artificial satellite theory,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 110, pp. 239–246, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Lara, “LEO intermediary propagation as a feasible alternative to Brouwer's gravity solution,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 367–376, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Lara, R. V. de Moraes, D. M. Sanchez, and A. F. B. A. Prado, Efficient Computation of Short-Period Analytical Corrections due to Third-Body Effects (AAS 15-295), American Astronautical Society, Univelt, Escondido, Claif, USA, 2015.
  21. G. Hori, “Theory of general perturbation with unspecified canonical variables,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 287–296, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Deprit, “Canonical transformations depending on a small parameter,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–30, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  23. K. R. Meyer and G. R. Hall, Introduction to Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems and the N-Body Problem, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
  24. D. Boccaletti and G. Pucacco, Theory of Orbits. Volume 2: Perturbative and Geometrical Methods, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1st edition, 2002.
  25. A. Deprit and A. Rom, “The main problem of artificial satellite theory for small and moderate eccentricities,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 166–206, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus