Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 1350807, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1350807
Research Article

Problems on Solving Matrix Aggregation in Group Decision-Making by Glowworm Swarm Optimization

1School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
2Anhui Economic Management Institute, Hefei 230059, China

Received 19 May 2016; Revised 16 July 2016; Accepted 17 July 2016

Academic Editor: Muhammad N. Akram

Copyright © 2016 Yaping Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C.-L. Hwang and K. P. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, vol. 186 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. G. Stasser and W. Titus, “Pooling of unshared information in group decision making. Biased information sampling during discussion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1467–1478, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Zeng, J. Gonzalez, and C. Lobato, “The effect of organizational learning and Web 2.0 on innovation,” Management Decision, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2060–2072, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leasers, Wadsworth Inc, Belmont, Calif, USA, 1982.
  5. E. U. Choo and W. C. Wedley, “Comparing fundamentals of additive and multiplicative aggregation in ratio scale multi-criteria decision making,” Open Operational Research Journal, vol. 2, pp. 1–7, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. I. Beg and T. Rashid, “A geometric aggregation operator for decision making,” Vietnam Journal of Computer Science, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 243–255, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Y.-J. Lu and X.-R. Guo, “Effective aggregation method for the AHP judgement matrix in group decision-making,” System Engineering Theory and Practice, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 132–136, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Huang, B. Jiao, F. Huang et al., “An aggregation method for group AHP judgment matrices based on the evidence theory,” Science Technology and Engineering, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 1–4, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  9. X. Zhai and X. Zhang, “The methods on aggregation of interval number judgment matrixes and calculation of its priorities in the group decision-making,” Systems Engineering, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 103–107, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  10. E. Han, P. Guo, and J. Zhao, “Method for multi-attribute group decision making based on interval grey uncertain linguistic assessment,” Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science & Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 93–102, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  11. E. K. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene, S. H. Razavi Hajiagha, and S. S. Hashemi, “The interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MULTIMOORA method for group decision making in engineering,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 560690, 13 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Li and J. Li, “Study of three point interval number judgment matrix decomposition and aggregation based on fermat and algorithm,” Mathematics in Practice and Theory, no. 17, pp. 214–221, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Zeng, J. Chen, and X. Li, “A hybrid method for Pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision making,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 403–422, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Zeng, W. Su, and C. Zhang, “Intuitionistic fuzzy generalized probabilistic ordered weighted averaging operator and its application to group decision making,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 177–193, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. M. Merigó, D. Palacios-Marqués, and S. Zeng, “Subjective and objective information in linguistic multi-criteria group decision making,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 248, no. 2, pp. 522–531, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. K. N. Krishnanand and D. Ghose, “Glowworm swarm optimization for simultaneous capture of multiple local optima of multimodal functions,” Swarm Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 87–124, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. Zainal, A. M. Zain, N. H. M. Radzi et al., “Glowworm swarm optimization (GSO) for optimization of machining parameters,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 797–804, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. N. Kotani and Y. Kodono, “A study on the pairwise comparison scale in AHP,” Journal of International Studies, vol. 19, pp. 1–13, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  19. M. T. Escobar, J. Aguarón, and J. M. Moreno-Jiménez, “Some extensions of the precise consistency consensus matrix,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 74, pp. 67–77, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Li, “Optimization of matrix aggregation method based on undirected connection graph theory,” Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business (Natural Sciences Edition), vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 10–13, 2014. View at Google Scholar