Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 1435321, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1435321
Research Article

User Adapted Motor-Imaginary Brain-Computer Interface by means of EEG Channel Selection Based on Estimation of Distributed Algorithms

1Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Computer Science Faculty, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
2Department of Computer Architecture and Technology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Computer Science Faculty, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain

Received 4 June 2014; Accepted 19 November 2014

Academic Editor: Yudong Zhang

Copyright © 2016 Aitzol Astigarraga et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Guger, B. Z. Allison, and G. Edlinger, Brain-Computer Interface Research: A State-of-the-Art Summary 2, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2014.
  2. M. Arvaneh, C. Guan, K. K. Ang, and C. Quek, “Optimizing the channel selection and classification accuracy in EEG-based BCI,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1865–1873, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Thulasidas, C. Guan, and J. Wu, “Robust classification of EEG signal for brain-computer interface,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Y. Kee, R. K. Chetty, B. H. Khoo, and S. Ponnambalam, “Genetic algorithm and bayesian linear discriminant analysis based channel Selection method for P300 BCI,” in Trends in Intelligent Robotics, Automation, and Manufacturing, vol. 330 of Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 226–235, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. T. Shibanoki, K. Shima, T. Tsuji, A. Otsuka, and T. Chin, “A quasi-optimal channel selection method for bioelectric signal classification using a partial Kullback-Leibler information measure,” IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 853–861, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Larrañaga and J. A. Lozano, Estimation of Distribution Algorithms. A New Tool for Evolutionary Computation, Kluwer Academic Press, 2001.
  7. P.-Y. Yin and H.-L. Wu, “Cyber-EDA: estimation of distribution algorithms with adaptive memory programming,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 132697, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Barachant and S. Bonnet, “Channel selection procedure using riemannian distance for BCI applications,” in Proceedings of the 5th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER '11), pp. 348–351, Cancun, Mexico, May 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Yang, H. Singh, E. L. Hines et al., “Channel selection and classification of electroencephalogram signals: an artificial neural network and genetic algorithm-based approach,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 117–126, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. N. Lal, M. Schröder, T. Hinterberger et al., “Support vector channel selection in BCI,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1003–1010, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Müller-Gerking, G. Pfurtscheller, and H. Flyvbjerg, “Designing optimal spatial filters for single-trial EEG classification in a movement task,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 787–798, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. V. N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. M. Xu, H. Qi, L. Ma et al., “Channel selection based on phase measurement in P300-based brain-computer interface,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID e60608, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. A. S. Hasan, J. Q. Gan, and Q. Zhang, “Multi-objective evolutionary methods for channel selection in brain-computer interfaces: some preliminary experimental results,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '10), pp. 1–6, Barcelona, Spain, July 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J.-Y. Kim, S.-M. Park, K.-E. Ko, and K.-B. Sim, “Optimal EEG channel selection for motor imagery BCI system using BPSO and GA,” in Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications 2012, vol. 208 of Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 231–239, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Schröder, M. Bogdan, T. Hinterberger, and N. Birbaumer, “Automated EEG feature selection for brain computer interfaces,” in Proceedings of the 1st International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, pp. 626–629, IEEE, March 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. Q. Wei, Z. Lu, K. Chen, and Y. Ma, “Channel selection for optimizing feature extraction in an electrocorticogram-based brain-computer interface,” Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 321–327, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. Santana, C. Bielza, and P. Larrañaga, “Regularized logistic regression and multiobjective variable selection for classifying MEG data,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 106, no. 6-7, pp. 389–405, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. Q. Wei and W. Tu, “Channel selection by genetic algorithms for classifying single-trial ECoG during motor imagery,” in Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS '08), pp. 624–627, IEEE, Vancouver, Canada, August 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Bhattacharyya, A. Sengupta, T. Chakraborti, A. Konar, and D. N. Tibarewala, “Automatic feature selection of motor imagery EEG signals using differential evolution and learning automata,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 131–139, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Price, R. Storn, and J. Lampinen, Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization, Natural Computing Series, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005. View at MathSciNet
  22. X. Zhang, L. Jiao, A. Paul, Y. Yuan, Z. Wei, and Q. Song, “Semisupervised particle swarm optimization for classification,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 832135, 11 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. I. Inza, P. Larrañaga, R. Etxeberria, and B. Sierra, “Feature subset selection by Bayesian network-based optimization,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 123, no. 1-2, pp. 157–184, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Zhang, S. Wang, P. Phillips, and G. Ji, “Binary PSO with mutation operator for feature selection using decision tree applied to spam detection,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 64, pp. 22–31, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. O. AlZoubi, I. Koprinska, and R. A. Calvo, “Classification of brain-computer interface data,” in Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Data Mining Conference (AusDM '08), J. F. Roddick, J. Li, P. Christen, and P. J. Kennedy, Eds., vol. 87 of CRPIT, pp. 123–131, Australian Computer Society, Adelaide, Australia, November 2008, http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ausdm/ausdm2008.html#AlZoubiKC08.
  26. B. Blankertz, K.-R. Müller, D. J. Krusienski et al., “The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 153–159, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Schlögl, F. Lee, H. Bischof, and G. Pfurtscheller, “Characterization of four-class motor imagery EEG data for the BCI-competition 2005,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 14–22, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. F. Lee, R. Scherer, R. Leeb, C. Neuper, H. Bischof, and G. Pfurtscheller, “A comparative analysis of multi-class EEG classification for brain-computer interface,” in Proceedings of the 10th Computer Vision Winter Workshop (CVWW '05), Zell an der Pram, Austria, February 2005.
  29. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  30. D. Meyer, F. Leisch, and K. Hornik, “The support vector machine under test,” Neurocomputing, vol. 55, no. 1-2, pp. 169–186, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. P. P. Reutemann, and I. Witten, “The weka data mining software: an update,” SIGKDD Exploration Newsletter, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  32. C. K. Chow and C. N. Liu, “Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 462–467, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  33. M. Henrion, “Propagating uncertainty in bayesian networks by probabilistic logic sampling,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, J. F. Lemmer and L. N. Kanal, Eds., pp. 149–164, Elsevier, 1988.
  34. S. Baluja and S. Davies, “Using optimal dependency-trees for combinatorial optimization: learning the structure of the search space,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML '97), D. H. Fisher, Ed., pp. 30–38, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif, USA, July 1997.
  35. M. Pelikan and H. Mühlenbein, “The bivariate marginal distribution algorithm,” in Advances in Soft Computing—Engineering Design and Manufacturing, R. Roy, T. Furuhashi, and P. Chawdhry, Eds., pp. 521–535, Springer, London, UK, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. R. Santana, A. Ochoa, and M. R. Soto, “The mixture of trees factorized distribution algorithm,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO '01), L. Spector, E. Goodman, A. Wu et al., Eds., pp. 543–550, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif, USA, July 2001.
  37. R. Santana, C. Bielza, P. Larrañaga et al., “Mateda-2.0: a MATLAB package for the implementation and analysis of estimation of distribution algorithms,” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1–30, 2010, http://www.jstatsoft.org/v35/i07. View at Google Scholar
  38. L. Susperregi, A. Arruti, E. Jauregi et al., “Fusing multiple image transformations and a thermal sensor with kinect to improve person detection ability,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1980–1991, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. B. Sierra, E. Lazkano, E. Jauregi, and I. Irigoien, “Histogram distance-based Bayesian Network structure learning: a supervised classification specific approach,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 180–190, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Y. Zhang, L. Wu, and S. Wang, “UCAV path planning by fitness-scaling adaptive chaotic particle swarm optimization,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 705238, 9 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. O. Arbelaitz, I. Gurrutxaga, J. Muguerza, J. M. Pérez, and I. Perona, “An extensive comparative study of cluster validity indices,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 243–256, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus