Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 2745092, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2745092
Research Article

Determining Sustainable Land Use by Modal Split Shift Strategy for Low Emissions: Evidence from Medium-Sized Cities of China

School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

Received 14 September 2015; Accepted 10 January 2016

Academic Editor: Yongjun Shen

Copyright © 2016 Wenzhu Zhou and Zhibin Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. N. Bagley and P. L. Mokhtarian, “The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: a structural equations modeling approach,” The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 279–297, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. M. Boarnet and R. Crane, Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  3. R. Cervero, “Mixed land-uses and commuting: evidence from the American housing survey,” Transportation Research Part A, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 361–377, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Cervero, “The built enviorment and travel: evidence from the United States,” European Journal of Transport and Infrastrcture Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 119–137, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Cervero and K. Kockelman, “Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design,” Transportation Research Part D, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 199–219, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Transpotaion Research Board, “Driving and the built enviorment: the effects of compact development on motorized travel, energy use, and CO2 emissions,” Special Report 298, TRB, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. Ewing and R. Cervero, “Travel and the built environment,” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 265–294, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Stead, “Relationships between land use, socioeconomic factors, and travel patterns in Britain,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 499–528, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. M. Dieleman, M. Dijst, and G. Burghouwt, “Urban form and travel behaviour: micro-level household attributes and residential context,” Urban Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 507–527, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. van Wee, “Evaluating the impact of land use on travel behaviour: the environment versus accessibility,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1530–1533, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Zhang, “The role of land use in travel mode choice: evidence from Boston and Hongkong,” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 344–360, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J.-J. Lin and P.-C. Hsiao, “Strategy development of mixed land use for restraining trip generation in Taipei City, Taiwan,” Transportation Research Record, no. 1983, pp. 167–174, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Zhao, B. Lü, and G. de Roo, “Urban expansion and transportation: the impact of urban form on commuting patterns on the city fringe of Beijing,” Environment and Planning A, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2467–2486, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Wang and Y. Chai, “The jobs-housing relationship and commuting in Beijing, China: the legacy of Danwei,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Wang, Y. Chai, and F. Li, “Built environment diversities and activity-travel behaviour variations in Beijing, China,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1173–1186, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. A. Badoe and E. J. Miller, “Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 235–263, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. Kockelman, “Which matters more in mode choice: density or income?: the relative effects of population density and income on modal split in urban areas,” in Proceedings of the ITE District 6 Conference, Denver, Colo, USA, August 1995.
  18. L. D. Frank, An Analysis of Relationship between Urban Form (Density, Mix, and Jobs: Housing Balance) and Travel Behavior (Mode Choice, Trip Generation, Trip Length, and Travel Time), Washington State Department of Transportation, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
  19. C. Banister and N. Gallent, “Sustainable commuting: a contradiction in terms?” Regional Studies, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 274–280, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Inoue, C. D. van Goeverden, K. Tsutsumi, T. Chishaki, and H. Hara, “Analysis of differences in population distribution between big cities in the Kyushu region and the Netherlands,” in Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Easts Conference, vol. 4, pp. 1488–1469, Fukuoka, Japan, 2003.
  21. L. Chao and S. Qing, “An empirical analysis of the influence of urban form on household travel and energy consumption,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 347–357, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Barla, L. F. Miranda-Moreno, and M. Lee-Gosselin, “Urban travel CO2 emissions and land use: a case study for Quebec City,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 423–428, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. Wang, W. Zhang, H. Guo, H. Bubb, and K. Ikeuchi, “A safety-based approaching behavioural model with various driving characteristics,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1202–1214, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. X. Jiang, W. Wang, and K. Bengler, “Intercultural analyses of time-to-collision in vehicle-pedestrian conflict on an urban midblock crosswalk,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1048–1053, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. D. Milakis, T. Vlastos, and N. Barbopoulos, “The optimum density for the sustainable city. The case of Athens,” in Sustainable Development and Planning, A. G. Kungolos, C. A. Brebbia, and E. Beriatios, Eds., vol. 1, Wessex Institute of Technology Press, London, UK, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  26. D. Milakis, Land use and transport. Investigation of the urban macro- and micro-scale effects on travel behaviour [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Geography and Regional Planning, National Technical University of Athens, 2006.
  27. P. Newman and J. Kenworthy, “Sustainability and cities. Overcoming automobile dependence,” Landscape & Urban Planning, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 219–226, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus