Research Article
Identification of Contour Lines from Average-Quality Scanned Topographic Maps
Table 2
Evaluation results of different contour lines extraction methods.
| Method | Image label | Completeness | Accuracy | Quality | RMS | Gaps | Misconnections |
| The proposed method | Figure 8(j) | 0.911 | 0.924 | 0.854 | 0.110 | 28 | 0 | Figure 9(j) | 0.907 | 0.905 | 0.837 | 0.112 | 24 | 0 | Figure 10(j) | 0.856 | 0.873 | 0.768 | 0.118 | 192 | 0 |
| Chen’s method | Figure 8(k) | 0.920 | 0.893 | 0.841 | 0.112 | 57 | 0 | Figure 9(k) | 0.878 | 0.828 | 0.759 | 0.120 | 44 | 2 | Figure 10(k) | 0.837 | 0.807 | 0.708 | 0.127 | 219 | 4 |
| Samet’s method | Figure 8(l) | 0.908 | 0.912 | 0.846 | 0.111 | 58 | 0 | Figure 9(l) | 0.894 | 0.881 | 0.791 | 0.116 | 46 | 0 | Figure 10(l) | 0.829 | 0.815 | 0.714 | 0.125 | 242 | 6 |
|
|