Research Article
A Hybrid Forecasting Model Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition and the Cuckoo Search Algorithm: A Case Study for Power Load
Table 1
Comparison of power load forecasting result by using different methods in Feb. 2.
| Time | Actual value (MWh) | BPNN | GABPNN | WNN | CSAWNN | EMD-CSAWNN | ARIMA | Forecasting | MAPE | Forecasting | MAPE | Forecasting | MAPE | Forecasting | MAPE | Forecasting | MAPE | Forecasting | MAPE | Value | (%) | Value | (%) | Value | (%) | Value | (%) | Value | (%) | Value | (%) |
| 0:00 | 8086.20 | 7267.78 | 10.12 | 7471.59 | 7.60 | 7828.93 | 3.18 | 7708.89 | 4.67 | 8033.14 | 0.66 | 8146.33 | 0.74 | 2:00 | 7132.07 | 7381.04 | 3.49 | 7193.94 | 0.87 | 7303.83 | 2.41 | 7150.74 | 0.26 | 7013.90 | 1.66 | 7298.17 | 2.33 | 4:00 | 7038.50 | 7023.50 | 0.21 | 7010.09 | 0.40 | 6470.25 | 8.07 | 6938.94 | 1.41 | 6938.97 | 1.41 | 6899.89 | 1.97 | 6:00 | 8803.29 | 8561.04 | 2.75 | 8611.39 | 2.18 | 8159.83 | 7.31 | 8612.24 | 2.17 | 8668.60 | 1.53 | 8619.45 | 2.09 | 8:00 | 10646.56 | 10778.68 | 1.24 | 10416.06 | 2.16 | 10890.92 | 2.30 | 10474.09 | 1.62 | 10707.41 | 0.57 | 10692.11 | 0.43 | 10:00 | 11822.68 | 11877.37 | 0.46 | 11811.56 | 0.09 | 11975.11 | 1.29 | 11880.45 | 0.49 | 11787.15 | 0.30 | 12002.49 | 1.52 | 12:00 | 12397.22 | 12329.59 | 0.55 | 12453.22 | 0.45 | 12328.77 | 0.55 | 12432.34 | 0.28 | 12326.00 | 0.57 | 12597.51 | 1.62 | 14:00 | 12824.82 | 12638.87 | 1.45 | 12918.86 | 0.73 | 12708.23 | 0.91 | 12929.78 | 0.82 | 12599.61 | 1.76 | 13091.61 | 2.08 | 16:00 | 13088.14 | 12810.33 | 2.12 | 13065.94 | 0.17 | 12903.89 | 1.41 | 13171.34 | 0.64 | 12830.13 | 1.97 | 12949.91 | 1.06 | 18:00 | 12001.48 | 11857.34 | 1.20 | 12090.61 | 0.74 | 12148.48 | 1.22 | 11500.36 | 4.18 | 11987.11 | 0.12 | 11776.37 | 1.88 | 20:00 | 10898.97 | 10827.46 | 0.66 | 10896.10 | 0.03 | 10967.20 | 0.63 | 10679.01 | 2.02 | 10778.06 | 1.11 | 10705.75 | 1.77 | 22:00 | 9398.37 | 9516.59 | 1.26 | 9665.37 | 2.84 | 9415.90 | 0.19 | 9706.03 | 3.27 | 9451.51 | 0.57 | 9446.46 | 0.51 |
|
|