Research Article

A Hybrid Forecasting Model Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition and the Cuckoo Search Algorithm: A Case Study for Power Load

Table 1

Comparison of power load forecasting result by using different methods in Feb. 2.

TimeActual value (MWh)BPNNGABPNNWNNCSAWNNEMD-CSAWNNARIMA
ForecastingMAPEForecastingMAPEForecastingMAPEForecastingMAPEForecastingMAPEForecastingMAPE
Value(%)Value(%)Value(%)Value(%)Value(%)Value(%)

0:008086.207267.7810.127471.597.607828.933.187708.894.678033.140.668146.330.74
2:007132.077381.043.497193.940.877303.832.417150.740.267013.901.667298.172.33
4:007038.507023.500.217010.090.406470.258.076938.941.416938.971.416899.891.97
6:008803.298561.042.758611.392.188159.837.318612.242.178668.601.538619.452.09
8:0010646.5610778.681.2410416.062.1610890.922.3010474.091.6210707.410.5710692.110.43
10:0011822.6811877.370.4611811.560.0911975.111.2911880.450.4911787.150.3012002.491.52
12:0012397.2212329.590.5512453.220.4512328.770.5512432.340.2812326.000.5712597.511.62
14:0012824.8212638.871.4512918.860.7312708.230.9112929.780.8212599.611.7613091.612.08
16:0013088.1412810.332.1213065.940.1712903.891.4113171.340.6412830.131.9712949.911.06
18:0012001.4811857.341.2012090.610.7412148.481.2211500.364.1811987.110.1211776.371.88
20:0010898.9710827.460.6610896.100.0310967.200.6310679.012.0210778.061.1110705.751.77
22:009398.379516.591.269665.372.849415.900.199706.033.279451.510.579446.460.51