Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 3460281, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3460281
Research Article

Sparse Representation Based Binary Hypothesis Model for Hyperspectral Image Classification

School of Air and Missile Defense, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710051, China

Received 9 March 2016; Revised 9 May 2016; Accepted 17 May 2016

Academic Editor: Wonjun Kim

Copyright © 2016 Yidong Tang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Melgani and L. Bruzzone, “Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1778–1790, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. E. Boser, I. M. Guyon, and V. N. Vapnik, “A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers,” in Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory (COLT '92), pp. 144–152, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, July 1992. View at Scopus
  3. J. A. Gualtieri and R. F. Cromp, “Support vector machines for hyperspectral remote sensing classification,” in 27th AIPR Workshop: Advances in Computer-Assisted Recognition, vol. 3584 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 221–232, Washington, DC, USA, October 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. G. Camps-Valls and L. Bruzzone, “Kernel-based methods for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1351–1362, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Bruzzone, M. Chi, and M. Marconcini, “A novel transductive SVM for semisupervised classification of remote-sensing images,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 3363–3372, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Wright, A. Y. Yang, A. Ganesh, S. S. Sastry, and Y. Ma, “Robust face recognition via sparse representation,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 210–227, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Z. Yuan, H. Sun, K. Ji, Z. Li, and H. Zou, “Local sparsity divergence for hyperspectral anomaly detection,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1697–1701, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Chen, N. M. Nasrabadi, and T. D. Tran, “Hyperspectral image classification via kernel sparse representation,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 217–231, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Chen, N. M. Nasrabadi, and T. D. Tran, “Sparse representation for target detection in hyperspectral imagery,” IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 629–640, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. Liguo and Z. Chunhui, Processing Techniques of Hyperspectral Imagery, National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, China, 2013 (Chinese).
  11. Y. Chen, N. M. Nasrabadi, and T. D. Tran, “Hyperspectral image classification using dictionary-based sparse representation,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 3973–3985, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Chen, N. M. Nasrabadi, and T. D. Tran, “Simultaneous joint sparsity model for target detection in hyperspectral imagery,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 676–680, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. A. Tropp and A. C. Gilbert, “Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 4655–4666, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. W. Dai and O. Milenkovic, “Subspace pursuit for compressive sensing signal reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2230–2249, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. M. Elad, Sparse and Redundant Representations: From Theory to Applications in Signal and Image Processing, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. H. Kwon and N. M. Nasrabadi, “Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 4099–4109, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  17. V. M. Patel and R. Chellappa, Sparse Representations and Compressive Sensing for Imaging and Vision, Springer Briefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, and S. Wang, “A Nonlinear sparse representation-based binary hypothesis model for hyperspectral target detection,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2513–2522, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. T. Wang, B. Du, and L. Zhang, “A kernel-based target-constrained interference-minimized filter for hyperspectral sub-pixel target detection,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 626–637, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Tang, S. Huang, Q. Ling, and Y. Zhong, “Adaptive kernel collaborative representation anomaly detection for hyperspectral imagery,” High Power Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 27, no. 9, Article ID 091008, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. Tarabalka, J. A. Benediktsson, J. Chanussot, and J. C. Tilton, “Multiple spectral-spatial classification approach for hyperspectral data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 4122–4132, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus