Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 3596517, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3596517
Research Article

A Modified Combination Rule for Numbers Theory

1School of Science, Hubei University for Nationalities, Enshi, Hubei 445000, China
2School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA

Received 30 April 2016; Accepted 3 October 2016

Academic Editor: Peide Liu

Copyright © 2016 Ningkui Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Liu and X. Yu, “2-Dimension uncertain linguistic power generalized weighted aggregation operator and its application in multiple attribute group decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 57, pp. 69–80, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Yu, “Multiattribute decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy interaction average operators: a comparison,” International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1017–1032, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. P. Liu and L. Shi, “The generalized hybrid weighted average operator based on interval neutrosophic hesitant set and its application to multiple attribute decision making,” Neural Computing & Applications, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 457–471, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. Jiang, C. Xie, M. Zhuang, Y. Shou, and Y. Tang, “Sensor data fusion with z-numbers and its application in fault diagnosis,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 9, p. 1509, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. E. T. Jaynes, Probability Theory: The Logic of Science, Cambridge University Press, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. A. F. Peressini, “Imprecise probability and chance,” Erkenntnis, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 561–586, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. H.-M. Lee, “Group decision making using fuzzy sets theory for evaluating the rate of aggregative risk in software development,” Fuzzy Sets & Systems, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 261–271, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Liu and F. Jin, “A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on weighted geometric aggregation operators of interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers,” Applied Mathematical Modelling. Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 2498–2509, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. Q. Li, “A novel Likert scale based on fuzzy sets theory,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1609–1618, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. Jiang, Y. Luo, X.-Y. Qin, and J. Zhan, “An improved method to rank generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 2343–2355, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Liu and Y. Wang, “Interval neutrosophic prioritized OWA operator and its application to multiple attribute decision making,” Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 681–697, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Yu and S. Shi, “Researching the development of Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy set: using a citation network analysis,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 32, pp. 189–198, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Yu, W. Zhang, and G. Huang, “Dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 194–209, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Skowron, “Rough set rudiments,” Help, 2000.
  15. Y. Yao, C.-J. Liau, and N. Zhong, “Granular computing based on rough sets, quotient space theory, and belief functions,” in Foundations of Intelligent Systems, N. Zhong, Z. W. Raś, S. Tsumoto, and E. Suzuki, Eds., vol. 2871 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 152–159, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. Z. Pawlak and A. Skowron, “Rudiments of rough sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 3–27, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. D. Chen, S. Ni, C. Xu, H. Lv, and K. Qin, “A soft rough-fuzzy preference set-based evaluation method for high-speed train operation diagrams,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 5795604, 8 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. B. Liu, Uncertainty Theory, vol. 43 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, Springer, 2010.
  19. P. Liu, X. Zhang, and F. Jin, “A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers hybrid harmonic averaging operators,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 159–168, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Deng, “A threat assessment model under uncertain environment,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 878024, 12 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. P. Dempster, “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 38, pp. 325–339, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. G. Shafer, “A mathematical theory of evidence,” in A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, vol. 20, p. 242, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  23. W. Jiang, J. Zhan, D. Zhou, and X. Li, “A method to determine generalized basic probability assignment in the open world,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 3878634, 11 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. S. Memon, Y. H. Lee, and S. I. Mari, “Group multi-criteria supplier selection using combined grey systems theory and uncertainty theory,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 21, pp. 7951–7959, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. Liu and F. Jin, “A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on weighted geometric aggregation operators of interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 2498–2509, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. P. Liu, F. Jin, X. Zhang, Y. Su, and M. Wang, “Research on the multi-attribute decision-making under risk with interval probability based on prospect theory and the uncertain linguistic variables,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 554–561, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Neshat and B. Pradhan, “Risk assessment of groundwater pollution with a new methodological framework: application of Dempster–Shafer theory and GIS,” Natural Hazards, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 1565–1585, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. Yu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy theory based typhoon disaster evaluation in Zhejiang Province, China: a comparative perspective,” Natural Hazards, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 2559–2576, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. W. Jiang, C. Xie, B. Wei, and D. Zhou, “A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–16, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. D. Yu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation under confidence levels,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 19, pp. 147–160, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. Liu and Y. Wang, “Multiple attribute decision-making method based on single-valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean,” Neural Computing & Applications, vol. 25, no. 7-8, pp. 2001–2010, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. R. Yager and N. Alajlan, “Decision making with ordinal payoffs under Dempster-Shafer type uncertainty,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1039–1053, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. Deng, “Generalized evidence theory,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 530–543, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Campanella and R. A. Ribeiro, “A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 52–60, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Tabassian, R. Ghaderi, and R. Ebrahimpour, “Knitted fabric defect classification for uncertain labels based on Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5259–5267, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Z.-G. Su and P.-H. Wang, “Minimizing neighborhood evidential decision error for feature evaluation and selection based on evidence theory,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 527–540, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Wei, X. Deng, X. Zhang, Y. Deng, and S. Mahadevan, “Identifying influential nodes in weighted networks based on evidence theory,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 392, no. 10, pp. 2564–2575, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. Moreira and A. Wichert, “Finding academic experts on a multisensor approach using Shannon's entropy,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 14, pp. 5740–5754, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. P. Liu and Y. Liu, “An approach to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy power generalized aggregation operator,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 291–304, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. Yu, J. Yang, D. Yang, X. Ma, and H. Min, “An improved conflicting evidence combination approach based on a new supporting probability distance,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 5139–5149, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Y. Deng, Y. Liu, and D. Zhou, “An improved genetic algorithm with initial population strategy for symmetric TSP,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 212794, 6 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, and E. K. Zavadskas, “Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications—two decades review from 1994 to 2014,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 4126–4148, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. W. Jiang, B. Wei, C. Xie, and D. Zhou, “An evidential sensor fusion method in fault diagnosis,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–7, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. P. Liu, L. He, and X. Yu, “Generalized hybrid aggregation operators based on the 2-dimension uncertain linguistic information for multiple attribute group decision making,” Group Decision & Negotiation, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 103–126, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. L. A. Zadeh, “Simple view of the dempster-shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination,” AI Magazine, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 85–90, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. R. R. Yager, “On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules,” Information Sciences, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 93–137, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  47. Y. Deng, “D numbers: theory and applications,” Journal of Information & Computational Science, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 2421–2428, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  48. X. Deng, Y. Hu, Y. Deng, and S. Mahadevan, “Environmental impact assessment based on D numbers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 635–643, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. H.-C. Liu, J.-X. You, X.-J. Fan, and Q.-L. Lin, “Failure mode and effects analysis using D numbers and grey relational projection method,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 4670–4679, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. X. Deng, Y. Hu, Y. Deng, and S. Mahadevan, “Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 156–167, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. G. Fan, D. Zhong, F. Yan, and P. Yue, “A hybrid fuzzy evaluation method for curtain grouting efficiency assessment based on an AHP method extended by D numbers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 44, pp. 289–303, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. Y.-M. Wang, J.-B. Yang, and D.-L. Xu, “Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 1885–1913, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  53. N. Rikhtegar, N. Mansouri, A. A. Oroumieh, A. Yazdani-Chamzini, E. K. Zavadskas, and S. Kildienė, “Environmental impact assessment based on group decision-making methods in mining projects,” Economic Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 378–392, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. K.-F. Pun, I.-K. Hui, W. G. Lewis, and H. C. W. Lau, “A multiple-criteria environmental impact assessment for the plastic injection molding process: a methodology,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus