Research Article
An Improved Approach to Identifying Key Classes in Weighted Software Network
Table 3
The correlative coefficient
.
| ā | Project | Degree | EC | BC | CC |
| aN-Degree | Tomcat | 0.861 | 0.125 | 0.629 | 0.626 | Ant | 0.889 | 0.230 | 0.439 | 0.615 | JUNG | 0.943 | 0.223 | 0.578 | 0.628 |
| mN-Degree | Tomcat | 0.878 | 0.262 | 0.628 | 0.710 | Ant | 0.862 | 0.384 | 0.720 | 0.912 | JUNG | 0.933 | 0.244 | 0.665 | 0.647 |
| aE-Weight | Tomcat | 0.921 | 0.151 | 0.682 | 0.451 | Ant | 0.994 | 0.144 | 0.791 | 0.568 | JUNG | 0.938 | 0.407 | 0.661 | 0.618 |
| mE-Weight | Tomcat | 0.981 | 0.311 | 0.564 | 0.675 | Ant | 0.980 | 0.342 | 0.570 | 0.650 | JUNG | 0.987 | 0.305 | 0.587 | 0.676 |
|
|
Note: represents the significant correlation.
|