Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4105079, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4105079
Research Article

Applying Hybrid Decision-Making Method Based on Fuzzy AHP-WOWA Operator for Emergency Alternative Evaluation of Unattended Train Operation Metro System

1National Engineering Research Center of Rail Transportation Operation and Control System, Beijing Jiaotong University, No. 3 Shang Yuan Cun, Haidian District, Beijing 100044, China
2State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University, No. 3 Shang Yuan Cun, Haidian District, Beijing 100044, China

Received 27 October 2015; Accepted 17 December 2015

Academic Editor: Konstantinos Karamanos

Copyright © 2016 Bobo Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. UITP, Press Kit Metro Automation Facts, Figures and Trends—A Global Bid for Automation: UITP Observatory of Automated Metros Confirms Sustained Growth Rates for the Coming Years, UITP, 2011, http://www.uitp.org/sites/default/files/Metro%20automation%20-%20facts%20and%20figures.pdf.
  2. W. Raskob and J. Ehrhardt, The RODOS System: Decision Support for Nuclear Off-Site Emergency Management in Europe, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, 2000.
  3. K. N. Papamichail and S. French, “Decision support in nuclear emergencies,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 71, no. 1–3, pp. 321–342, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Ehrhardt, J. Päsler-Sauer, O. Schüle, G. Benz, M. Rafat, and J. Richter, “Development of RODOS∗, a comprehensive decision support system for nuclear emergencies in Europe—an overview,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 50, no. 2–4, pp. 195–203, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Geldermann, V. Bertsch, M. Treitz, S. French, K. N. Papamichail, and R. P. Hämäläinen, “Multi-criteria decision support and evaluation of strategies for nuclear remediation management,” Omega, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 238–251, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. V. Bertsch, M. Treitz, J. Geldermann, and O. Rentz, “Sensitivity analyses in multi-attribute decision support for off-site nuclear emergency and recovery management,” International Journal of Energy Sector Management, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 342–365, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. G. Zografos, G. M. Vasilakis, and I. M. Giannouli, “Methodological framework for developing decision support systems (DSS) for hazardous materials emergency response operations,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 503–521, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  8. K. G. Zografos and K. N. Androutsopoulos, “A decision support system for integrated hazardous materials routing and emergency response decisions,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 684–703, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Abrahamsson, H. Hassel, and H. Tehler, “Towards a system-oriented framework for analysing and evaluating emergency response,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 14–25, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Wang, C. Qi, and H. Wang, “Improving emergency response collaboration and resource allocation by task network mapping and analysis,” Safety Science, vol. 70, pp. 9–18, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Wang and W. Fang, “A structured method for the traffic dispatcher error behavior analysis in metro accident investigation,” Safety Science, vol. 70, pp. 339–347, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Karvonen, I. Aaltonen, M. Wahlström, L. Salo, P. Savioja, and L. Norros, “Hidden roles of the train driver: a challenge for metro automation,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 289–298, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. IEC, “Railway applications—urban guided transport management and command/control systems—part 2: functional requirements specification,” Draft EN 62290-2, 2011, http://webstore.iec.ch/Webstore/webstore.nsf/Artnum_PK/49864. View at Google Scholar
  14. M. K. Lindell, C. Prater, and R. W. Perry, Wiley Pathways Introduction to Emergency Management, John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
  15. Y. Ju and A. Wang, “Emergency alternative evaluation under group decision makers: amethod of incorporating DS/AHP with extended TOPSIS,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1315–1323, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Meng and Z. Pei, “On weighted unbalanced linguistic aggregation operators in group decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 223, pp. 31–41, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  18. N. Subramanian and R. Ramanathan, “A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 215–241, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Deng, “Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 215–231, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. T. Tanino, “Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 117–131, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. J. Rezaei and R. Ortt, “Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  22. C. V. Altrock and B. Krause, “Multi-criteria decision making in German automotive industry using fuzzy logic,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 375–380, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P.-L. Chang and Y.-C. Chen, “A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for technology transfer strategy selection in biotechnology,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 131–139, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G.-H. Tzeng, T.-A. Shiau, and J.-Y. Teng, “Multiobjective decision-making approach to energy supply mix decisions in Taiwan,” Energy Sources, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 301–316, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. T. Tang and G. H. Tzeng, “A hierarchy fuzzy MCDM method for studying electronic marketing strategies in the information service industry,” Journal of International Information Management, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  26. R. R. Yager, “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 183–190, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. M. Grabisch, S. A. Orlovski, and R. R. Yager, “Fuzzy aggregation of numerical preferences,” in Fuzzy Sets in Decision Analysis, Operations Research and Statistics, pp. 31–68, Springer US, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. G. R. Amin, “Notes on properties of the OWA weights determination model,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 533–538, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. V. Torra, “The weighted OWA operator,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 153–166, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  30. A. Valls and V. Torra, “Using classification as an aggregation tool in MCDM,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 159–168, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. Nettleton and J. Muñiz, “Processing and representation of meta-data for sleep apnea diagnosis with an artificial intelligence approach,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 63, no. 1-2, pp. 77–89, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C.-S. Yu, “A GP-AHP method for solving group decision-making fuzzy AHP problems,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 1969–2001, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. Ju, A. Wang, and X. Liu, “Evaluating emergency response capacity by fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 6972–6981, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. A. Ribeiro, “Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: a review and new preference elicitation techniques,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 155–181, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  35. R. R. Levary and K. Wan, “A simulation approach for handling uncertainty in the analytic hierarchy process,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 116–122, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. W. Ogryczak and T. Śliwiński, “On efficient WOWA optimization for decision support under risk,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 915–928, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  38. R. R. Yager, “On the cardinality index and attitudinal character of fuzzy measures,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 303–329, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  39. R. Fullér and P. Majlender, “An analytic approach for obtaining maximal entropy OWA operator weights,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  40. Y.-M. Wang and C. Parkan, “A minimax disparity approach for obtaining OWA operator weights,” Information Sciences, vol. 175, no. 1-2, pp. 20–29, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  41. Y.-M. Wang, Y. Luo, and X. Liu, “Two new models for determining OWA operator weights,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 203–209, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Y. P. Jiang and Z. P. Fan, Decision Theory and Method Based on Judgement Matrix, Science Press, 2008, http://www.sciencep.com/s_single.php?id=16934.