Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4512383, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4512383
Research Article

A Modified Model of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Based on Generalized Evidence Theory

1School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710072, China
2Automotive Engineering Institute, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 511434, China

Received 28 April 2016; Revised 15 June 2016; Accepted 30 June 2016

Academic Editor: Jianbing Ma

Copyright © 2016 Deyun Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. M. Tashjian, “The failure modes and effects analysis as a design tool for nuclear safety systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus & Systems, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 97–103, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. J. Reifer, “Software failure modes and effects analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 28, pp. 247–249, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  3. C. E. Peláez and J. B. Bowles, “Using fuzzy cognitive maps as a system model for failure modes and effects analysis,” Information Sciences, vol. 88, no. 1–4, pp. 177–199, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. G. Hawkins and D. J. Woollons, “Failure modes and effects analysis of complex engineering systems using functional models,” Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 375–397, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. S. Krouwer, “An improved failure mode effects analysis for hospitals,” Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 663–667, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Q.-L. Lin, D.-J. Wang, W.-G. Lin, and H.-C. Liu, “Human reliability assessment for medical devices based on failure mode and effects analysis and fuzzy linguistic theory,” Safety Science, vol. 62, pp. 248–256, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. M. Gerhart, H. Spriggs, T. W. Hampton et al., “Applying human factors to develop an improved package design for (Rx) medication drug labels in a pharmacy setting,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 55, pp. 177–184, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Woodhouse, “Engineering for safety: use of failure mode and effects analysis in the laboratory: a well-known engineering tool now being used to assure patient safety,” Laboratory Medicine, vol. 36, pp. 16–18, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  9. Q. Zhou and V. V. Thai, “Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction,” Safety Science, vol. 83, pp. 74–79, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Cicek and M. Celik, “Application of failure modes and effects analysis to main engine crankcase explosion failure on-board ship,” Safety Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 6–10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. F. Modes, Effects Analysis in Design (Design FMEA) and Potential Failure Modes and Effects Analysis in Manufacturing and Assembly Processes (Process FMEA) Reference Manual, Society of Automobile Engineers, 1994.
  12. L. Kurt and S. Ozilgen, “Failure mode and effect analysis for dairy product manufacturing: practical safety improvement action plan with cases from Turkey,” Safety Science, vol. 55, pp. 195–206, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. P. Lijesh, S. M. Muzakkir, and H. Hirani, “Failure mode and effect analysis of passive magnetic bearing,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 62, pp. 1–20, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H.-C. Liu, J.-X. You, M.-M. Shan, and L.-N. Shao, “Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid TOPSIS approach,” Soft Computing, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1085–1098, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H.-C. Liu, L. Liu, and P. Li, “Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted Euclidean distance operator,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2012–2030, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. H.-C. Liu, J.-X. You, X.-Y. You, and M.-M. Shan, “A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy VIKOR method,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 28, pp. 579–588, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. A. Mesa, M. A. S. Hurtado, F. M. S. Margallo, V. G. C. de Vaca, and A. L. Komorowski, “Application of failure mode and effect analysis in laparoscopic colon surgery training,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 536–542, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. H. Jong, K. M. Tay, and C. P. Lim, “Application of the fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis methodology to edible bird nest processing,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 96, pp. 90–108, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y.-C. Chen and W.-F. Wu, “Constructing an effective prevention mechanism for MSW lifecycle using failure mode and effects analysis,” Waste Management, vol. 46, pp. 646–652, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S.-H. Luo and G.-G. Lee, “Applying failure mode and effects analysis for successful knowledge management,” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol. 26, pp. 62–75, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Petrillo, R. Fusco, V. Granata et al., “Risk management in magnetic resonance: failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 763186, 5 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y.-M. Wang, K.-S. Chin, G. K. K. Poon, and J.-B. Yang, “Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1195–1207, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Guo, “A risk assessment approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and evidence theory,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 869–881, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Geum, Y. Cho, and Y. Park, “A systematic approach for diagnosing service failure: service-specific FMEA and grey relational analysis approach,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 54, no. 11-12, pp. 3126–3142, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Bevilacqua, M. Braglia, and R. Gabbrielli, “Monte Carlo simulation approach for a modified FMECA in a power plant,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 313–324, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K.-S. Chin, Y.-M. Wang, G. K. K. Poon, and J.-B. Yang, “Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1768–1779, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. W. Jiang, C. Xie, B. Wei, and D. Zhou, “A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–16, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. Z. Yang, S. Bonsall, and J. Wang, “Fuzzy rule-based Bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 517–528, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. Xiao, H.-Z. Huang, Y. Li, L. He, and T. Jin, “Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1162–1170, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Dong, “Failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy utility cost estimation,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 958–971, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Abdelgawad and A. R. Fayek, “Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 136, no. 9, pp. 1028–1036, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H.-C. Liu, L. Liu, and N. Liu, “Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 828–838, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. Xu, L. C. Tang, M. Xie, S. L. Ho, and M. L. Zhu, “Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K.-H. Chang and C.-H. Cheng, “A risk assessment methodology using intuitionistic fuzzy set in FMEA,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1457–1471, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  35. P. A. A. Garcia, R. Schirru, and P. F. Frutuoso E Melo, “A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for FMEA,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 46, no. 3-4, pp. 359–373, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. H.-C. Liu, J.-X. You, X.-J. Fan, and Q.-L. Lin, “Failure mode and effects analysis using D numbers and grey relational projection method,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 4670–4679, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C.-L. Chang, C.-C. Wei, and Y.-H. Lee, “Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy method and grey theory,” Kybernetes, vol. 28, no. 8-9, pp. 1072–1080, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Yang, H.-Z. Huang, L.-P. He, S.-P. Zhu, and D. Wen, “Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 2084–2092, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. X. Su, Y. Deng, S. Mahadevan, and Q. Bao, “An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 26, pp. 164–174, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. C. Kutlu and M. Ekmekçioğlu, “Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K.-H. Chang and C.-H. Cheng, “Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 113–129, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. F. Zammori and R. Gabbrielli, “ANP/RPN: a multi criteria evaluation of the risk priority number,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 85–104, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. Von Ahsen, “Cost-oriented failure mode and effects analysis,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 466–476, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. Y. Deng, “Generalized evidence theory,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 530–543, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. P. Dempster, “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 38, pp. 325–339, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  46. G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1976. View at MathSciNet
  47. C. K. Murphy, “Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. W. Jiang, B. Wei, C. Xie, and D. Zhou, “An evidential sensor fusion method in fault diagnosis,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–7, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. Z.-G. Liu, Q. Pan, J. Dezert, and A. Martin, “Adaptive imputation of missing values for incomplete pattern classification,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 52, pp. 85–95, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. W. Jiang, B. Wei, X. Qin, J. Zhan, and Y. Tang, “Sensor data fusion based on a new conflict measure,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, In press.
  51. X. Su, S. Mahadevan, W. Han, and Y. Deng, “Combining dependent bodies of evidence,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 634–644, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. W. Jiang, J. Zhan, D. Zhou, and X. Li, “A method to determine generalized basic probability assignment in the open world,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 3878634, 11 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  53. N. R. Sankar and B. S. Prabhu, “Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis,” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 324–335, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. K. Sharma, D. Kumar, and P. Kumar, “Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 986–1004, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. P. Smets and R. Kennes, “The transferable belief model,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 191–234, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  56. W.-B. Du, Y. Gao, C. Liu, Z. Zheng, and Z. Wang, “Adequate is better: particle swarm optimization with limited-information,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 268, pp. 832–838, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  57. W.-B. Du, X.-L. Zhou, O. Lordan, Z. Wang, C. Zhao, and Y.-B. Zhu, “Analysis of the Chinese Airline Network as multi-layer networks,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 89, pp. 108–116, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. Y. Deng, Y. Liu, and D. Zhou, “An improved genetic algorithm with initial population strategy for symmetric TSP,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 212794, 6 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. X. Ning, J. Yuan, and X. Yue, “Uncertainty-based optimization algorithms in designing fractionated spacecraft,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 22979, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. X. Ning, J. Yuan, X. Yue, and A. Ramirez-Serrano, “Induced generalized choquet aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute decision making based on the intelligent computing,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1077–1085, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. C. C. Chou, “A generalized similarity measure for fuzzy numbers,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1147–1155, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. Y. Deng, “Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process based on canonical representation on fuzzy numbers,” Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 201–228, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  63. F. Sabahi and M.-R. Akbarzadeh-T, “A qualified description of extended fuzzy logic,” Information Sciences, vol. 244, pp. 60–74, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  64. F. Sabahi and M.-R. Akbarzadeh-T, “Introducing validity in fuzzy probability for judicial decision-making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1383–1403, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  65. W. Jiang, Y. Luo, X.-Y. Qin, and J. Zhan, “An improved method to rank generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 2343–2355, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. C. Fu, J.-B. Yang, and S.-L. Yang, “A group evidential reasoning approach based on expert reliability,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 246, no. 3, pp. 886–893, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  67. Y. Deng, S. Mahadevan, and D. Zhou, “Vulnerability assessment of physical protection systems: a bio-inspired approach,” International Journal of Unconventional Computing, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 227–243, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. X. Ning, T. Zhang, Y. Wu et al., “Coordinated parameter identification technique for the inertial parameters of non-cooperative target,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 4, Article ID e0153604, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar