Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 5795604, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5795604
Research Article

A Soft Rough-Fuzzy Preference Set-Based Evaluation Method for High-Speed Train Operation Diagrams

1School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2National Railway Train Diagram Research and Training Center, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
3National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Comprehensive Intelligent Transportation, Chengdu 610031, China
4School of Mathematics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

Received 11 November 2015; Accepted 31 January 2016

Academic Editor: Mingshu Peng

Copyright © 2016 Dingjun Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Carey and A. Kwieciński, “Stochastic approximation to the effects of headways on knock-on delays of trains,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 251–267, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Carey and S. Carville, “Testing schedule performance and reliability for train stations,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 666–682, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. I. A. Hansen, “Station capacity and stability of train operations,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Railways, pp. 809–816, 2000.
  4. R. M. P. Goverde and M. A. Odijk, “Performance evaluation of network timetables using PETER,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computers in Railways. Computers in Railways, vol. 8, pp. 731–740, Lemnos, Greece, 2002.
  5. R. M. P. Goverde, “Railway timetable stability analysis using max-plus system theory,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 179–201, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. X. Delorme, X. Gandibleux, and J. Rodriguez, “Stability evaluation of a railway timetable at station level,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 195, no. 3, pp. 780–790, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Börjesson and J. Eliasson, “On the use of ‘average delay’ as a measure of train reliability,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 171–184, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. J. C. M. Vromans, R. Dekker, and L. G. Kroon, “Reliability and heterogeneity of railway services,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 647–665, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. M. P. Goverde and F. Yan, “Stability and robustness analysis of acyclic timetable,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis (RailTokyo '15), Narashimo, Japan, March 2015.
  10. Z. X. Yang and A. Z. Hu, “A study of the dynamic performance & index system of the train operation diagram,” Journal of the China Railway Society, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 46–56, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  11. C. H. Tian, “Fuzzy synthetic evaluation on the railway train schedule,” Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, vol. 4, pp. 50–54, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  12. Q. Y. Peng, “A system for evaluation of train diagram elasticity,” Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 367–371, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  13. Q. Peng, Y. Zhang, and M. Li, “Methods for evaluation of the equilibrium of train diagrams,” Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 372–377, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  14. X. Meng and L. Jia, “Train timetable stability evaluation based on analysis of interior and exterior factors information entropy,” Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1319–1325, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Liu, Researches on Optimization and Evaluation of High-Speed Railway Timetable, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China, 2014.
  16. J.-J. Ma, H. Xu, S.-J. Hu, and Z.-X. Chen, “Study of index evaluation system of train working diagram on Jinghu high-speed railway line,” Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 46–50, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Zhu, H. Wang, and B. Lu, “Method for optimally selecting the train diagram of passenger dedicated line based on Vague sets,” China Railway Science, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 122–127, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. J. Bao, The Evaluation Theory and Method of High-Speed Train Diagram, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China, 2012.
  19. H. Sipilä, “A simulation based framework for evaluatingeffects of infrastructure improvements onscheduled and operational delays,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis (RailTokyo), International Association of Railway Operations Research, 2015.
  20. K. Keiji, H. Naohiko, and M. Shigeru, “Simulation analysis of train operation to recover knock-on delay under high-frequency intervals,” Case Studies on Transport Policy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 92–98, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Higgins and E. Kozan, “Modeling train delays in urban networks,” Transportation Science, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 346–357, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  22. M. A. Salido, F. Barber, and L. Ingolotti, “Robustness in railway transportation scheduling,” in Proceedings of the 7th IEEE World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA '08), pp. 2880–2885, Chongqing, China, June 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y.-J. Yang and Y.-Q. He, “Evaluation of stability of railway working diagram based on max-plus algebra,” Journal of the China Railway Society, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 14–19, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Y. Meng, Z. X. Yang, H. Y. Li, and J. An, “Analysis on the dynamic performance of PDL train working diagram based on train path layout,” China Railway Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 90–95, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Z. Jiang, C.-H. Hsu, D. Zhang, and X. Zou, “Evaluating rail transit timetable using big passengers' data,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 82, no. 1, part B, pp. 144–155, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. Z. Pawlak, “Rough sets,” International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 341–356, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. W. X. Zhang, W. Z. Wu, and J. Y. Liang, Rough Set Theory and Method, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2001.
  28. D. Molodtsov, “Soft set theory-first results,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 37, no. 4-5, pp. 19–31, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  29. F. Yue, Z.-P. Su, Y. Lu, and G.-F. Zhang, “Comprehensive evaluation of software quality based on fuzzy soft sets,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1460–1466, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus