Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 5856083, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5856083
Research Article

Sensor Placement via Optimal Experiment Design in EMI Sensing of Metallic Objects

1Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
2Black Tusk Geophysics Inc., Vancouver, Canada

Received 12 July 2016; Revised 19 October 2016; Accepted 1 November 2016

Academic Editor: Sebastian Heidenreich

Copyright © 2016 Lin-Ping Song et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. World Health Organization, Guidance for Surveillance of Injuries Due to Landmines and Unexploded Ordnance, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
  2. B. Delaney and D. Etter, Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Unexploded Ordnance, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense For Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
  3. A. Andrews and H. Nelson, “Implementing advanced classification on munitions response sites: a guide to informed decision making for project managers, regulators, and contractors,” ESTCP, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1975. View at MathSciNet
  5. F. S. Grant and G. F. West, Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics, section 6.5, McGraw-Hill, 1965.
  6. L. R. Pasion and D. W. Oldenburg, “A discrimination algorithm for UXO using time domain electromagnetics,” Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 91–102, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. T. Smith and H. F. Morrison, “Estimating equivalent dipole polarizabilities for the inductive response of isolated conductive bodies,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1208–1214, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L.-P. Song, D. W. Oldenburg, L. R. Pasion, and S. D. Billings, “Transient electromagnetic inversion for multiple targets,” in Proceedings of the Detection and Sensing of Mines, Explosive Objects, and Obscured Targets XIV, vol. 7303, Orlando, Fla, USA, April 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. T. M. Grzegorczyk, B. E. Barrowes, F. Shubitidze, J. P. Fernández, and K. O'Neill, “Simultaneous identification of multiple unexploded ordnance using electromagnetic induction sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 2507–2517, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L.-P. Song, L. R. Pasion, S. D. Billings, and D. W. Oldenburg, “Nonlinear inversion for multiple objects in transient electromagnetic induction sensing of unexploded ordnance: technique and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 4007–4020, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. V. V. Fedorov, Theory of Optimal Experiments, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1972. View at MathSciNet
  12. A. C. Atkinson, A. N. Doney, and R. Tobias, Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, UK, 2007.
  13. D. J. C. MacKay, “Information-based objective functions for active data selection,” Neural Computation, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 590–604, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. X. Liao and L. Carin, “Application of the theory of optimal experiments to adaptive electromagnetic-induction sensing of buried targets,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 961–972, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Das, J. E. McFee, J. Toews, and G. C. Stuart, “Analysis of an electromagnetic induction detector for real-time location of buried objects,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 278–288, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. H. Bell, B. J. Barrow, and J. T. Miller, “Subsurface discrimination using electromagnetic induction sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1286–1293, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Tarantola, Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. C. D. Meyer, Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, SIAM, 2000.
  19. L. R. Pasion, Inversion of time domain electromagnetic data for the detection of unexploded ordnance [Ph.D. dissertation], The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 2007.
  20. J. J. Moré, “The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory,” in Numerical Analysis, G. A. Watson, Ed., vol. 630 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 105–116, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. T. F. Coleman and Y. Li, “An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 418–445, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. Optimization Toolbox Users Guide, The Math Works Inc., Natick, Mass, USA, 2013.
  23. ESTCP MR-201165 Demonstration Data Report Former Camp Beale TEMTADS MP 2x2 Cart Survey, 2011.
  24. J. P. Fernandez, B. E. Barrowes, T. M. Grzegorczyk, N. Lhomme, K. O'Neill, and F. Shubitidze, “A man-portable vector sensor for identification of unexploded ordnance,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2542–2555, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. K. A. Kingdon, N. Lhomme, and D. C. George, “A man portable EMI system for detection and classification of unexploded ordnance in challenging environments,” FastTimes, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 31–41, 2014. View at Google Scholar