Research Article
Designing a Repetitive Group Sampling Plan for Weibull Distributed Processes
Table 4
The comparison of sample sizes for two sampling plans based on
(
).
| | | (, ) | (0.05, 0.05) | (0.05, 0.10) | (0.10, 0.05) | | | | | | |
| 0.01 | 0.02 | 23 | 16.458 | 19 | 16.959 | 18 | 14.2 | 0.03 | 10 | 7.1244 | 8 | 6.2595 | 8 | 5.5389 | 0.04 | 6 | 5.0553 | 5 | 4.3975 | 5 | 3.5794 | 0.05 | 5 | 3.7129 | 4 | 3.3056 | 4 | 2.8039 | 0.06 | 4 | 2.9532 | 4 | 3.0521 | 3 | 2.4443 | 0.07 | 4 | 2.5903 | 3 | 2.5397 | 3 | 2.2039 | 0.08 | 3 | 2.4721 | 3 | 2.2746 | 3 | 2.0847 | 0.09 | 3 | 2.2356 | 3 | 2.1822 | 2 | 2.0516 | 0.10 | 3 | 2.1392 | 3 | 2.0756 | 2 | 2.0123 |
| 0.02 | 0.03 | 65 | 49.045 | 53 | 40.844 | 51 | 38.264 | 0.04 | 23 | 17.597 | 19 | 14.232 | 18 | 13.192 | 0.05 | 13 | 9.8811 | 11 | 9.4282 | 10 | 7.3731 | 0.06 | 10 | 6.5968 | 8 | 6.1958 | 7 | 5.3262 | 0.07 | 8 | 5.4223 | 6 | 4.7171 | 6 | 4.0192 | 0.08 | 6 | 4.7219 | 5 | 4.2003 | 5 | 3.5767 | 0.09 | 5 | 4.0582 | 5 | 3.6068 | 4 | 3.0002 | 0.10 | 5 | 3.6081 | 4 | 3.1886 | 4 | 2.6436 | 0.15 | 3 | 2.4335 | 3 | 2.2361 | 3 | 2.0693 |
| 0.05 | 0.06 | 309 | 217.43 | 246 | 175.95 | 242 | 182.68 | 0.07 | 91 | 64.232 | 73 | 54.051 | 71 | 52.267 | 0.08 | 47 | 32.385 | 38 | 28.96 | 36 | 26.693 | 0.09 | 30 | 21.152 | 25 | 18.281 | 23 | 17.328 | 0.10 | 22 | 15.256 | 18 | 13.692 | 17 | 12.001 | 0.15 | 9 | 6.5325 | 8 | 5.9048 | 7 | 5.0282 | 0.20 | 6 | 4.1483 | 5 | 3.864 | 5 | 3.1257 | 0.25 | 5 | 3.1438 | 4 | 2.9261 | 4 | 2.444 |
| 0.10 | 0.15 | 59 | 39.075 | 47 | 35.526 | 46 | 31.445 | 0.20 | 20 | 13.612 | 17 | 12.333 | 16 | 10.695 | 0.25 | 12 | 7.8417 | 10 | 7.161 | 9 | 6.1821 | 0.30 | 8 | 5.6353 | 7 | 5.1473 | 6 | 4.3262 | 0.35 | 6 | 4.4906 | 5 | 4.1959 | 5 | 3.3826 | 0.40 | 5 | 3.6763 | 5 | 3.3677 | 4 | 2.7629 | 0.50 | 4 | 2.754 | 3 | 2.5159 | 3 | 2.2246 |
|
|
Note: and denote the sample size of the single sampling plan and VRGS plan, respectively.
|