Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 6169586, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6169586
Research Article

Fuzzy Approach in Ranking of Banks according to Financial Performances

1Faculty of Economics, University of Kragujevac, Ðure Pucara Starog 3, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia
2Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of East Sarajevo, Vuka Karadžića 30, 71123 Lukavica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
3Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Sestre Janjic 6, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia
4Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Kraljice Marije 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Received 16 March 2016; Accepted 16 May 2016

Academic Editor: Kishin Sadarangani

Copyright © 2016 Milena Jakšić et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Zha, N. Liang, M. Wu, and Y. Bian, “Efficiency evaluation of banks in China: a dynamic two-stage slacks-based measure approach,” Omega, vol. 60, pp. 60–72, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. Wooluru, D. R. Swamy, and P. Nagesh, “The process capability analysis—a tool for process performance measures and metrics—a case study,” International Journal for Quality Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 399–416, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Dong, M. Firth, W. Hou, and W. Yang, “Evaluating the performance of Chinese commercial banks: a comparative analysis of different types of banks,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 252, no. 1, pp. 280–295, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning,” Information Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 199–249, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. H.-J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications, Kluwer Nijhoff, Boston, Mass, USA, 2001. View at MathSciNet
  6. G. J. Klir and T. A. Folger, Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and Information, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ USA, 1988. View at MathSciNet
  7. W. Pedrycz and S. M. Chen, Granular Computing and Decision-Making. Interactive and Iterative Approaches, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2015.
  8. C. Zopounidis and M. Doumpos, “Multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 11, no. 4-5, pp. 167–186, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. T. L. Saaty, “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process,” European Journal Operational Research, vol. 48, pp. 9–26, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  10. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making-Methods and Applications, vol. 186, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1981. View at MathSciNet
  11. C. Domanski and J. Kondrasiuk, “Analytic Hierarchy process—applications in banking,” Mathematics and Statistic, vol. 6, pp. 435–445, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Bhattarai and S. R. Yadav, “AHP application in banking: unfolding utility and in a situation of financial crisis,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP '09), University of Pittsburgh, 2009.
  13. M. Yurdakul and Y. T. Iç, “AHP approach in the credit evaluation of the manufacturing firms in Turkey,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 269–289, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. K. Kwong and H. Bai, “Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHF with an extent analysis approach,” IIE Transactions, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 619–626, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Y. Seçme, A. Bayrakdaroǧlu, and C. Kahraman, “Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 11699–11709, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Chatterjee and B. A. Mukherjee, “Study of the application of fuzzy analytical hierarchical process (FAHP) in the ranking of Indian banks,” International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 2511–2520, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Sadi-Nezhad and K. K. Damghani, “Application of a fuzzy TOPSIS method base on modified preference ratio and fuzzy distance measurement in assessment of traffic police centers performance,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1028–1039, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. I. Mahdavi, N. Mahdavi-Amiri, A. Heidarzade, and R. Nourifar, “Designing a model of fuzzy TOPSIS in multiple criteria decision making,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 206, no. 2, pp. 607–617, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. F. Torfi, R. Z. Farahani, and S. Rezapour, “Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 520–528, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Kaya and C. Kahraman, “Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 6577–6585, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Tadic, A. T. Gumus, S. Arsovski, A. Aleksic, and M. Stefanovic, “An evaluation of quality goals by using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 547–556, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. T. Chen, “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Tadić, M. Stefanović, and A. Aleksić, “The evaluation and ranking of medical device suppliers by using fuzzy topsis methodology,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2091–2101, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Tadic, A. Aleksic, M. Stefanovic, and S. Arsovski, “Evaluation and ranking of organizational resilience factors by using a two step fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 418085, 13 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. A. Kelemenis and D. Askounis, “A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 4999–5008, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. T. Gumus, “Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 4067–4074, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. Paksoy, N. Y. Pehlivan, and C. Kahraman, “Organizational strategy development in distribution channel management using fuzzy AHP and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 2822–2841, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C.-T. Chen, C.-T. Lin, and S.-F. Huang, “A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 289–301, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. X. Q. Wu, F. Pu, S. H. Shao, and J. N. Fang, “Trapezoidal fuzzy AHP for the comprehensive evaluation of highway network programming shemes in Yangtze River Delta,” in Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA '04), vol. 6, pp. 5232–5236, Hangzhou, China, June 2004.
  30. D.-Y. Chang, “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 649–655, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  31. C. Kahraman, T. Ertay, and G. Büyüközkan, “A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 390–411, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. Büyüközkan, O. Feyzioğlu, and E. Nebol, “Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 148–158, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. C. Pomerol and S. Barba-Romeo, Multicriteria Decision Management: Principles and Practice, Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, Boston, Mass, USA, 2000.
  34. H.-S. Shih, H.-J. Shyur, and E. S. Lee, “An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 45, no. 7-8, pp. 801–813, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  35. G. Işiklar and G. Büyüközkan, “Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives,” Computer Standards and Interfaces, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 265–274, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M.-F. Chen and G.-H. Tzeng, “c,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 40, no. 13, pp. 1473–1490, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. Chakraborty and D. Chakraborty, “A theoretical development on a fuzzy distance measure for fuzzy numbers,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 43, no. 3-4, pp. 254–261, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  38. G. J. Klir and B. Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Theory and Applications, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1995. View at MathSciNet
  39. G. Zheng, N. Zhu, Z. Tian, Y. Chen, and B. Sun, “Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments,” Safety Science, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 228–239, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. A. Malik, A. Mushtaq, K. Naseem, and S. A. Malik, “Examining the relationship among service quality, customer satisfaction and behavioral responses—comparison between public and private sector banks of Pakistan,” International Journal for Quality Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 365–380, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  41. S. M. Baas and H. Kwakernaak, “Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets,” Automatica, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  42. D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Decision-making under fuzziness,” in Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, pp. 279–302, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. B. Sadeghpour-Gildeh and D. Gien, “The distance and the coefficient of correlation between two random variables,” in Proceedings of the French Meeting on Fuzzy Logic and Its Applications, vol. 1, pp. 97–102, 2001.
  44. P. Grzegorzewski, “Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 319–328, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus