Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 6723410, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6723410
Research Article

An Improved Approach for Estimating the Hyperparameters of the Kriging Model for High-Dimensional Problems through the Partial Least Squares Method

1Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, 1320 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
2ONERA, 2 Avenue Édouard Belin, 31055 Toulouse, France
3SNECMA, Rond-Point René Ravaud-Réau, 77550 Moissy-Cramayel, France
4Institut Clément Ader, CNRS, ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, 10 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31055 Toulouse Cedex 4, France

Received 31 December 2015; Revised 10 May 2016; Accepted 24 May 2016

Academic Editor: Erik Cuevas

Copyright © 2016 Mohamed Amine Bouhlel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Krige, “A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand,” Journal of the Chemical, Metallurgical and Mining Society, vol. 52, pp. 119–139, 1951. View at Google Scholar
  2. G. Matheron, “Principles of geostatistics,” Economic Geology, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1246–1266, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Cressie, “Spatial prediction and ordinary kriging,” Mathematical Geology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 405–421, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. J. Sacks, S. B. Schiller, and W. J. Welch, “Designs for computer experiments,” Technometrics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2006. View at MathSciNet
  6. D. R. Jones, M. Schonlau, and W. J. Welch, “Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 455–492, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. S. Sakata, F. Ashida, and M. Zako, “Structural optimizatiion using Kriging approximation,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 192, no. 7-8, pp. 923–939, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Forrester, A. Sobester, and A. Keane, Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
  9. J. Laurenceau, Kriging based response surfaces for aerodynamic shape optimization [Thesis], Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse (INPT), Toulouse, France, 2008.
  10. J. P. C. Kleijnen, W. van Beers, and I. van Nieuwenhuyse, “Constrained optimization in expensive simulation: novel approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 164–174, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. P. Kleijnen, W. van Beers, and I. van Nieuwenhuyse, “Expected improvement in efficient global optimization through bootstrapped kriging,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 59–73, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. J. L. Loeppky, J. Sacks, and W. J. Welch, “Choosing the sample size of a computer experiment: a practical guide,” Technometrics, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 366–376, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. M. A. Bouhlel, N. Bartoli, A. Otsmane, and J. Morlier, “Improving kriging surrogates of high-dimensional design models by partial least squares dimension reduction,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 935–952, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. J. Sacks, W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell, and H. P. Wynn, “Design and analysis of computer experiments,” Statistical Science, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 409–435, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. M. Sasena, Flexibility and efficiency enhancements for constrained global design optimization with Kriging approximations [Ph.D. thesis], University of Michigan, 2002.
  16. V. Picheny, D. Ginsbourger, Y. Richet, and G. Caplin, “Quantile-based optimization of noisy computer experiments with tunable precision,” Technometrics, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 2–13, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. O. Roustant, D. Ginsbourger, and Y. Deville, “DiceKriging, DiceOptim: two R packages for the analysis of computer experiments by kriging-based metamodeling and optimization,” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–55, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. P. Kleijnen, Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments, vol. 230, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2015.
  19. I. S. Helland, “On the structure of partial least squares regression,” Communications in Statistics. Simulation and Computation, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 581–607, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. l. E. Frank and J. H. Friedman, “A statistical view of some chemometrics regression tools,” Technometrics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 109–135, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. R. A. Pérez and G. González-Farias, “Partial least squares regression on symmetric positive-definite matrices,” Revista Colombiana de Estadística, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 177–192, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. R. Manne, “Analysis of two partial-least-squares algorithms for multivariate calibration,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 2, no. 1–3, pp. 187–197, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort et al., “Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python,” Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. R. G. Regis and C. A. Shoemaker, “Combining radial basis function surrogates and dynamic coordinate search in high-dimensional expensive black-box optimization,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 529–555, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus