Research Article

Robust Structure Preserving Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Dimensionality Reduction

Table 3

Clustering performance on local noise contaminated datasets. The best performances are highlighted in bold font.
(a)

DatasetAccuracy (%)
meansPCANMFGNMFSPNMFRSPNMF

FERET23.10 ± 1.1426.12 ± 1.2724.20 ± 1.0325.05 ± 0.7427.45 ± 5.2233.06 ± 1.25
ORL35.71 ± 2.7446.99 ± 2.6944.56 ± 1.5937.78 ± 1.3744.78 ± 1.754.01 ± 3.3
Yale32.12 ± 2.3837.43 ± 2.2738.18 ± 2.1832.45 ± 1.1636.36 ± 1.2444.42 ± 1.08

(b)

DatasetNormalized mutual information (%)
meansPCANMFGNMFSPNMFRSPNMF

FERET49.2 ± 2.5656.85 ± 1.5454.33 ± 1.1250.06 ± 2.5158.26 ± 0.8967.44 ± 1.73
ORL53.78 ± 2.5665.79 ± 1.5464.57 ± 1.1258.65 ± 2.5164.26 ± 0.8971.50 ± 1.73
Yale35.73 ± 2.4942.72 ± 2.3043.77 ± 1.5838.84 ± 0.9842.72 ± 1.1247.56 ± 1.19