Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 8215308, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8215308
Research Article

Multiobjective Optimal Algorithm for Automatic Calibration of Daily Streamflow Forecasting Model

1School of Hydropower and Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
2Hubei Key Laboratory of Digital Valley Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
3State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Reduction for Power Grid Transmission and Distribution Equipment, Changsha 410129, China
4State Grid Hunan Electric Company Disaster Prevention and Reduction Center, Changsha 410129, China
5School of Engineering and Technology, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China

Received 15 March 2016; Accepted 28 July 2016

Academic Editor: Marco Mussetta

Copyright © 2016 Yi Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Raman and N. Sunilkumar, “Multivariate modelling of water resources time series using artificial neural networks,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 145–163, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Liu, J.-Z. Zhou, F.-P. Qiu, J.-J. Yang, and L. Liu, “Nonlinear hydrological time series forecasting based on the relevance vector regression,” in Neural Information Processing, I. King, J. Wang, L.-W. Chan, and D. Wang, Eds., vol. 4233 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 880–889, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. V. N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. J.-Q. Xiong and Z.-Y. Li, “Sediment-carrying capacity forecasting based on support vector machine,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1171–1175, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J.-Y. Lin, C.-T. Cheng, and K.-W. Chau, “Using support vector machines for long-term discharge prediction,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 599–612, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Behzad, K. Asghari, M. Eazi, and M. Palhang, “Generalization performance of support vector machines and neural networks in runoff modeling,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 7624–7629, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W.-C. Hong, “Rainfall forecasting by technological machine learning models,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 41–57, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. G.-R. Yu and Z.-Q. Xia, “Prediction model of chaotic time series based on support vector machine and its application to runoff,” Advances in Water Science, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 116–122, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. A. Vrugt, H. V. Gupta, L. A. Bastidas, W. Bouten, and S. Sorooshian, “Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models,” Water Resources Research, vol. 39, no. 8, p. 1214, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. H. V. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, and P. O. Yapo, “Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and noncommensurable measures of information,” Water Resources Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 751–763, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Mussetta, P. Pirinoli, S. Selleri, and R. E. Zich, “Meta-PSO for multi-objective EM problems,” in Multi-Objective Swarm Intelligent Systems, vol. 261, pp. 125–150, Springer, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. P. O. Yapo, H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian, “Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 204, no. 1–4, pp. 83–97, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. V. Gupta, L. A. Bastidas, S. Sorooshian, W. J. Shuttleworth, and Z. L. Yang, “Parameter estimation of a land surface scheme using multicriteria methods,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 104, no. 16, Article ID 1999JD900154, pp. 19491–19503, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. P. Boyle, H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian, “Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods,” Water Resources Research, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 3663–3674, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. T. Wagener, D. P. Boyle, M. J. Lees, H. S. Wheater, H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian, “A framework for development and application of hydrological models,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Beldring, “Multi-criteria validation of a precipitation-runoff model,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 257, no. 1–4, pp. 189–211, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Xia, A. J. Pitman, H. V. Gupta, M. Leplastrier, A. Henderson-Sellers, and L. A. Bastidas, “Calibrating a land surface model of varying complexity using multicriteria methods and the Cabauw dataset,” Journal of Hydrometeorology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 181–194, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Leplastrier, A. J. Pitman, H. V. Gupta, and Y. Xia, “Exploring the relationship between complexity and performance in a land surface model using the multi-criteria method,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 107, no. 20, pp. ACL 11-1–ACL 11-12, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. T. Khu and H. Madsen, “Multiobjective calibration with Pareto preference ordering: an application to rainfall-runoff model calibration,” Water Resources Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. K. Gill, Y. H. Kaheil, A. Khalil, M. McKee, and L. Bastidas, “Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for parameter estimation in hydrology,” Water Resources Research, vol. 42, no. 7, Article ID W07417, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. J. De Vos and T. H. M. Rientjes, “Multi-objective performance comparison of an artificial neural network and a conceptual rainfall-runoff model,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 397–413, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. J. de Vos and T. H. M. Rientjes, “Multiobjective training of artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff modeling,” Water Resources Research, vol. 44, no. 8, Article ID W08434, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. K. Deb, A. Samir, P. Amrit, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II,” in Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI, vol. 1917, pp. 849–858, Springer, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. R. Storn and K. Price, “Differential evolution—a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces,” Tech. Rep. TR-95-012, ICSI, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  25. R. Storn and K. Price, “Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341–359, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. M. M. Ali and Z. Kajee-Bagdadi, “A local exploration-based differential evolution algorithm for constrained global optimization,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 31–48, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. S. Das and S. Sil, “Kernel-induced fuzzy clustering of image pixels with an improved differential evolution algorithm,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 8, pp. 1237–1256, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. V. C. Mariani, L. G. J. Luvizotto, F. A. Guerra, and L. dos Santos Coelho, “A hybrid shuffled complex evolution approach based on differential evolution for unconstrained optimization,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 217, no. 12, pp. 5822–5829, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  29. X. Zhang, J. Zhou, C. Wang, C. Li, and L. Song, “Multi-class support vector machine optimized by inter-cluster distance and self-adaptive deferential evolution,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 218, no. 9, pp. 4973–4987, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. X. Yuan, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, and Y. Yuan, “An enhanced differential evolution algorithm for daily optimal hydro generation scheduling,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 2458–2468, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele, “SPEA2: improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm,” Tech. Rep. 103, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  32. T. Zhang, H. Wang, and Z. Wang, “Multative scale chaos optimization algorithm and its application,” Journal of Control and Decision, vol. 14, pp. 285–288, 1999. View at Google Scholar