A Robust Service Selection Method Based on Uncertain QoS

Table 2

The QoS value of 40 candidate services.

Number
Task 1
1	[0.432, 16.523]	[0.02, 4.629]	97.94%
2	[0.078, 4.29]	[0.932, 51.282]	98.23%
3	[0.084, 13.835]	[0.433, 71.428]	98.53%
4	[0.061, 3.317]	[0.602, 32.786]	98.53%
5	[0.071, 3.103]	[0.644, 28.169]	98.53%
6	[0.015, 6.582]	[0.455, 200.0]	99.71%
7	[0.154, 9.626]	[0.207, 12.987]	99.71%
8	[0.22, 9.552]	[11.201, 486.363]	99.71%
9	[0.115, 3.726]	[0.536, 17.391]	98.53%
10	[0.169, 13.237]	[0.226, 17.751]	98.23%
Task 2
11	[0.301, 16.648]	[0.12, 6.644]	97.94%
12	[0.444, 15.867]	[0.126, 4.504]	94.69%
13	[1.541, 16.807]	[3.093, 33.744]	98.82%
14	[0.455, 9.651]	[1.347, 28.571]	97.94%
15	[0.191, 19.652]	[0.101, 10.471]	74.63%
16	[0.116, 15.877]	[0.06, 17.241]	98.23%
17	[0.466, 11.27]	[0.798, 19.313]	98.23%
18	[0.502, 11.187]	[0.804, 17.928]	97.94%
19	[0.284, 10.87]	[0.275, 10.563]	100.00%
20	[0.164, 2.149]	[1.395, 18.292]	100.00%
Task 3
21	[0.164, 3.594]	[0.834, 18.292]	100.00%
22	[0.325, 9.772]	[0.306, 9.23]	100.00%
23	[0.162, 3.512]	[0.854, 18.518]	100.00%
24	[0.162, 3.816]	[0.786, 18.518]	100.00%
25	[0.345, 7.115]	[0.421, 8.695]	100.00%
26	[0.17, 2.066]	[1.452, 17.647]	100.00%
27	[0.169, 2.173]	[1.38, 17.751]	100.00%
28	[0.17, 2.349]	[1.277, 17.647]	100.00%
29	[0.379, 14.363]	[0.208, 7.915]	100.00%
30	[0.194, 4.32]	[0.694, 15.463]	100.00%
Task 4
31	[0.195, 14.418]	[0.208, 15.384]	100.00%
32	[0.217, 13.192]	[0.227, 13.824]	98.82%
33	[0.2, 3.272]	[0.916, 15.0]	98.82%
34	[0.202, 3.61]	[0.831, 14.851]	98.82%
35	[0.383, 19.796]	[0.146, 7.832]	99.41%
36	[0.216, 5.397]	[0.555, 13.888]	99.71%
37	[0.276, 11.531]	[0.433, 18.115]	98.53%
38	[0.496, 16.851]	[0.534, 18.145]	100.00%
39	[0.422, 15.991]	[2.814, 106.635]	100.00%
40	[0.343, 9.15]	[0.546, 14.577]	100.00%