Research Article | Open Access

Yanchai Liu, Liu Cui, Dengping Duan, "Dynamic Output Feedback Stabilization of Singular Fractional-Order Systems", *Mathematical Problems in Engineering*, vol. 2016, Article ID 9694780, 8 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9694780

# Dynamic Output Feedback Stabilization of Singular Fractional-Order Systems

**Academic Editor:**Asier Ibeas

#### Abstract

This paper is concerned with dynamic output feedback controller (DOFC) design problem for singular fractional-order systems with the fractional-order satisfying . Based on the stability theory of fractional-order system, sufficient and necessary conditions are derived for the admissibility of the systems, which are more convenient to analytical design of stabilizing controllers than the existing results. A full-order DOFC is then synthesized based on the obtained conditions and the characteristics of Moore-Penrose inverse. Finally, a numerical example is presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

#### 1. Introduction

During the past years, the study on fractional-order systems has become a hot research topic since they can concisely and precisely characterize many real-world physical systems with the introduction of fractional-order calculus [1, 2]. Up to date, considerable attention has been devoted to the stability analysis and controller design for fractional-order systems and many results have been published in the literature (see, e.g., [3ā9] and the references therein).

On the other hand, singular systems have been extensively studied in the past years due to their applications in economics, circuits, and many other fields (see, e.g., [10ā14] and the references therein). The research on singular fractional-order systems is much more complicated than that for state-space systems, because it requires considering not only stability, but also regularity and impulse elimination, while the latter do not appear in regular ones. Very recently, the study on singular fractional-order systems has received much attention. For example, sufficient and necessary condition of admissibility for fractional-order singular system was proposed in [15]. However, it is noted that the conditions obtained in [15] are not convenient for matrix transformation and may cause difficulty in controller design. In addition, only systems with fractional-order belonging to are considered. Based on the obtained stability results in [15] and matrixās singular value decomposition (SVD), state and static output feedback controller design methods were proposed in [16] for singular fractional-order systems with fractional-order . In [17], the problem of robust stabilization for a class of uncertain singular fractional-order systems with fractional commensurate order was studied. However, the systems in [17] are required to be normalizable, that is, , which is very restrictive. In [18], the problem of robust stability and stabilization of interval uncertain descriptor fractional-order systems with fractional-order was studied. However, similarly as in [17], only state-feedback controller was designed, which means that the obtained method cannot be applied to system with state being unavailable. Up to now, the problem of stability analysis and controller design for singular fractional-order systems has not been fully investigated, which is very challenging and of great importance. This motivates us to carry out this study.

In this paper, we will study the dynamic output control problem for singular fractional-order systems with fractional commensurate order . The main contributions of this paper can be summarized as follows.(1)New necessary and sufficient conditions will be derived for the stability of the focused systems, which are more convenient to analytical design of stabilizing controllers than the existing results.(2)The desired full DOFC is designed in a whole framework. It is practically important to stabilize systems by output feedback controller since it is usually hard to sense all the states and feed them back. The effectiveness and applicability of proposed results are verified by a numerical example.*Notations*. is the set of all real matrices. The superscripts āā and ā+ā represent the transpose and the Moore-Penrose inverse, respectively, and āā denotes the term that is induced by symmetry. is used to denote , stands for the Kronecker product, and represents initialized th order differintegration.

#### 2. Problem Formulation and Preliminaries

Consider the following singular fractional-order system:where is the fractional commensurate order; , , and are the state vector, the control input, and the measurable output, respectively. The matrix may be singular and it is assumed that . The system matrices , , , and are real matrices with appropriate dimensions.

In this paper, the Caputo definition is adopted for fractional derivatives of order of function since this Laplace transform allows using initial values of classical integral-order derivatives with clear physical interpretations, which is defined as follows:where the fractional-order , , and the gamma function .

For system (1), we are interested in designing a DOFC of the following form:where is the state vector of the controller. The matrices , , and are the controller matrices to be determined.

Augmenting the model of system (1) to include the states of DOFC (3), the closed-loop system is governed bywhere and

The unforced singular fractional-order system of (1) can be written as

*Definition 1 (see [15]). *For singular fractional-order (6), the pair is said to be regular if there exists a constant scalar such that the pseudopolynomial is not identically zero.

Lemma 2 (see [15]). * For singular fractional-order (6), the pair is regular if and only if there exist two nonlinear matrices and such that where and are in Jordan canonical forms and is nilpotent.** For singular fractional-order (6), the pair is impulse-free if ; that is, in (7).*

Lemma 3 (see [19]). *For fractional-order, linear system with order is asymptotically stable if and only if where is a deterministic real matrix and is the spectrum of .*

The regularity and absence of impulses of the pair ensure the existence and uniqueness of an impulse-free solution to system (6). Based on Lemmas 2 and 3, we have the following lemma.

Lemma 4. * Suppose the pair is regular and impulse-free; then the solution to (6) exists and is impulse-free and unique on .** Suppose the pair is regular and impulse-free; system (6) is asymptotically stable if .*

*Proof. *Noting the regularity and absence of impulses of the pair and using the decomposition as in [15] and Lemma 3, the desired result follows immediately.

Throughout the paper, we will use the following notion of admissibility for singular fractional-order system.

*Definition 5 (see [15]). *The singular fractional-order system (6) is said to be admissible, if it is regular, impulse-free, and asymptotically stable.

The necessary and sufficient conditions for the stability of state-space fractional-order systems with the fractional-order belonging to are provided by the two following lemmas.

Lemma 6 (see [20]). *Let and . The fractional-order system is asymptotically stable (i.e., ), if and only if there exists a symmetric matrix such thatwhere is the spectrum of all eigenvalues of .*

Lemma 7 (see [21]). *Let and . The fractional-order system is asymptotically stable (i.e., ), if and only if there exist two real symmetric positive definite matrices , , and two skew-symmetric matrices , , such thatwhere*

#### 3. Admissibility Analysis of Singular Fractional-Order Systems

In this section, we will investigate the admissibility of closed-loop system (3) with fractional-order belonging to and .

Theorem 8. *Closed-loop system (4) with fractional-order belonging to is admissible, if and only if there exist nonsingular matrices and , , such thatwhere , and , satisfy (11).*

*Proof. *āā*Sufficiency*. Since , there exist nonsingular matrices and such thatDenoteFrom (14)-(15) and using the expressions in (16) and (17), it is easy to get , , and , . Premultiplying and postmultiplying inequality (12) by and , respectively, we obtainwhich implies is nonsingular. According to Theorem of [22], the pair is regular and impulse-free.

Next, we will show the asymptotical stability of system (4). Since is nonsingular, we set . It is easy to see thatwhere and .

From (12)ā(15) and using the expression in (19), we obtain Define ; closed-system (4) is the restricted system equivalent to By Lemma 6, we can derive from (20) that , , andTherefore, by Definition 5, system (4) is admissible.*Necessity*. Since is admissible, there exist nonsingular matrices and such thatBy Lemma 7, there exist two real symmetric positive definite matrices , , and two skew-symmetric matrices , , such thatDefineWe can easily verify that the conditions in (12)ā(15) hold. This completes the proof.

*Remark 9. *Sufficient and necessary conditions are proposed for the admissibility of singular fractional-order systems with fractional-order belonging to . The conditions are formulated in terms of nonstrict LMI with equality constraint. Compared with the results obtained in [15], the conditions proposed in Theorem 8 are more convenient to controller design.

By Lemma 6, we have the following theorem for the admissibility of closed-system (4) with fractional-order belonging to .

Theorem 10. *Closed-loop system (4) with fractional-order belonging to is admissible, if and only if there exists nonsingular matrix such thatwhere*

*Proof. *The proof is similar to that of Theorem 8; we omit it.

*Remark 11. *To the authorās best knowledge, it is for the first time that sufficient and necessary conditions are proposed for the admissibility of singular fractional-order systems with fractional-order . The results obtained in Theorems 8 and 10 can be easily extended to singular fractional-order systems with norm-bounded parameter uncertainties (i.e., in [17]).

#### 4. Dynamic Output Controller Design

In this section, we study the design of DOFC for singular fractional-order system (1) with fractional-order belonging to and . The following lemma will be used in this section.

Lemma 12 (see [23]). *The matrix inequality holds, if and only if*

Based on the conditions obtained in Theorem 8, the following theorem is presented to construct the desired controller.

Theorem 13. *Closed-system (3) with fractional-order belonging to is admissible, if there exist matrices , , , , and with appropriate dimensions such thatwhere**Moreover, if the above conditions in (30) and (31) are feasible, the system matrices of an admissible DOFC in the form of (3) are given by*

*Proof. *By setting and and using Theorem 8, sufficient conditions for the admissibility of closed-loop system (4) can be obtained asDefineWithout loss of generality, it is assumed that matrices and are nonsingular; if not, and may be perturbed by and , respectively, with sufficient small norm such that and are nonsingular and satisfy (31). From (30) and by using the properties of Moore-Penrose inverse, we can getMoreover, from (37), we haveBy Lemma 12, inequality (35) holds.

On the other hand, let , and pre- and postmultiplying (34) by and its transpose, respectively, we obtainwhereConsidering the controller matrices given in (33), we obtain (34) from (39). This completes the proof.

*Remark 14. *By using the characteristics of Moore-Penrose inverse, Theorem 13 provides sufficient conditions for the solvability of DOFC design problem for singular fractional-order systems with fractional-order belonging to . The matrices of desired DOFC can be constructed through the solutions of LMIs (30)-(31).

The following theorem is proposed for the design of DOFC for singular fractional-order systems with fractional-order belonging to .

Theorem 15. *Closed-system (3) with fractional-order belonging to is admissible, if there exist matrices , , , , and with appropriate dimensions such thatwhere**Moreover, if the above conditions in (41)-(42) are feasible, the system matrices of an admissible DOFC in the form of (3) are given by*

*Proof. *The desired result can be carried out by employing the same technique used as in Theorem 13.

*Remark 16. *It is noted that the conditions obtained in Theorems 13 and 15 are nonstrict LMIs due to the matrix inequality constraints in (30) and (41), which will lead to numerical problems while checking the conditions. Substituting and into (25)-(26) and (41)-(42) can yield strict LMIs, where matrices and , matrices and , is any matrix satisfying , and is any matrix satisfying .

#### 5. Illustrative Example

Consider the following singular fractional-order system described in (1) with parameters as follows:

*Case I (). *In this case, we choose . Using Matlab/LMItool to solve LMIs in (30)-(31), we can get the DOFC parameters to be determined as follows:In addition, . By Definition 5, the obtained DOFC can asymptotically stabilize the singular fractional-order system with fractional-order . Setting the initial conditions , the time response of closed-loop system (4) is illustrated in Figure 1. From Figure 1, we can observer that the trajectories of fractional-order system (45) with fractional-order can asymptotically converge to zero under the designed DOFC controller.

*Case II (). *In this case, we choose . Using Matlab/LMItool again to solve LMIs in (41)-(42), we can get the DOFC parameters to be determined as follows:In this situation, . By Definition 5, the obtained DOFC can asymptotically stabilize the singular fractional-order system with fractional-order . Setting the initial conditions , the time response of closed-loop system (4) is illustrated in Figure 2. From Figure 2, we can observer that the trajectories of fractional-order system (45) with fractional-order can asymptotically converge to zero under the designed DOFC controller.

#### 6. Conclusion

In this paper, the problem of DOFC design for singular fractional-order systems with fractional-order satisfying has been investigated. Sufficient and necessary conditions for the admissibility of the systems have been derived, which are formulated in terms of LMIs. Based on the obtained conditions, the desired DOFC have been designed. An illustrative example has been given to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

#### Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

#### References

- C. A. Monje, Y. Chen, B. Vinagre, D. Xue, and V. Feliu,
*Fractional-Order Systems and Controls: Fundamentals and Applications*, Springer, London, UK, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | MathSciNet - S. Das,
*Functional Fractional Calculus*, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | MathSciNet - Y.-H. Lim, K.-K. Oh, and H.-S. Ahn, āStability and stabilization of fractional-order linear systems subject to input saturation,ā
*IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control*, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1062ā1067, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - J. Lu and G. R. Chen, āRobust stability and stabilization of fractional-order interval systems with the fractional-order
*α*: the $0<\alpha <1$ case,ā*IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control*, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 152ā158, 2010. View at: Google Scholar - S. Kamal, A. Raman, and B. Bandyopadhyay, āFinite-time stabilization of fractional-order uncertain chain of integrator: an integral sliding mode approach,ā
*IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control*, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1597ā1602, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - H. Shen, X. Song, and Z. Wang, āRobust fault-tolerant control of uncertain fractional-order systems against actuator faults,ā
*IET Control Theory & Applications*, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1233ā1241, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - M. Rivero, S. V. Rogosin, J. A. Machado, and J. J. Trujillo, āStability of fractional order systems,ā
*Mathematical Problems in Engineering*, vol. 2013, Article ID 356215, 14 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - Y. Wang and T. Li, āStability analysis of fractional-order nonlinear systems with delay,ā
*Mathematical Problems in Engineering*, vol. 2014, Article ID 301235, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - J. Luo, āState-feedback control for fractional-order nonlinear systems subject to input saturation,ā
*Mathematical Problems in Engineering*, vol. 2014, Article ID 891639, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - A. Haidar and E. K. Boukas, āExponential stability of singular systems with multiple time-varying delays,ā
*Automatica*, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 539ā545, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - L. Wu and W. X. Zheng, āPassivity-based sliding mode control of uncertain singular time-delay systems,ā
*Automatica*, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 2120ā2127, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - Y. Wang, Q. Wang, P. Zhou, and D. Duan, āRobust guaranteed cost control for singular Markovian jump systems with time-varying delay,ā
*ISA Transactions*, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 559ā565, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - Y. Wang, P. Shi, Q. Wang, and D. Duan, āExponential Hinf filtering for singular Markovian jump systems with mixed mode-dependent time-varying delay,ā
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-1: Regular Paper*, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 2440ā2452, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - C. Han, L. Wu, H. K. Lam, and Q. Zeng, āNonfragile control with guaranteed cost of T-S fuzzy singular systems based on parallel distributed compensation,ā
*IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems*, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1183ā1196, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - Y. Yu, Z. Jiao, and C.-Y. Sun, āSufficient and necessary condition of admissibility for fractional-order singular system,ā
*Acta Automatica Sinica*, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2160ā2164, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - Y. Ji and J. Qiu, āStabilization of fractional-order singular uncertain systems,ā
*ISA Transactions*, vol. 56, pp. 53ā64, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - I. N'Doye, M. Darouach, M. Zasadzinski, and N.-E. Radhy, āRobust stabilization of uncertain descriptor fractional-order systems,ā
*Automatica*, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1907ā1913, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - Y. Li, H. Liu, and H. Wang, āRobust stability and stabilization of interval uncertain descriptor fractional-order systems with the fractional-order
*α*: the $1\le \alpha <2$ case,ā*Mathematical Problems in Engineering*, vol. 2015, Article ID 606048, 8 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - D. Matignon, āStability results for fractional differential equations with applications to control processing,ā in
*Proceedings of the IMACS-IEEE Multiconference on Computational Engineering in Systems Applications (CESA '96)*, pp. p963āp968, Lille, France, 1996. View at: Google Scholar - M. Chilali, P. Gahinet, and P. Apkarian, āRobust pole placement in LMI regions,ā
*IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control*, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2257ā2270, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - J. Lu and Y. Chen, āRobust stability and stabilization of fractional-order interval systems with the fractional-order
*α*: the $0<\alpha <1$ case,ā*IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control*, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 152ā158, 2010. View at: Google Scholar - S. Xu and J. Lam,
*Robust Control and Filtering of Singular Systems*, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006. View at: MathSciNet - S. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan,
*Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory*, vol. 15 of*SIAM Studies in Applied Mathematics*, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | MathSciNet

#### Copyright

Copyright © 2016 Yanchai Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.