Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 1438425, 18 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1438425
Research Article

A Scientific Decision Framework for Supplier Selection under Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment

1School of Computing, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
2School of Management, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence should be addressed to R. Krishankumar; ni.ca.artsas@ramuknahsirk

Received 14 May 2017; Revised 29 July 2017; Accepted 7 August 2017; Published 3 October 2017

Academic Editor: Love Ekenberg

Copyright © 2017 R. Krishankumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Govindan and M. B. Jepsen, “Supplier risk assessment based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and ELECTRE TRI-C: A case illustration involving service suppliers,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 339–376, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Afzali, M. Kuchaki Rafsanjani, and A. Borumand Saeid, “A fuzzy multi-objective linear programming model based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for supplier selection,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 864–874, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. K. Atanassov and G. Gargov, “Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems. An International Journal in Information Science and Engineering, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 343–349, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. K. T. Atanassov, “Operators over interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems. An International Journal in Information Science and Engineering, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 159–174, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. H. Bustince and P. Burillo, “Correlation of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems. An International Journal in Information Science and Engineering, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 237–244, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. Z. Xu and J. Chen, “Approach to Group Decision Making Based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Judgment Matrices,” Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 126–133, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. Z. Yue and Y. Jia, “An application of soft computing technique in group decision making under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 2490–2503, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Kavita, S. P. Yadav, and S. Kumar, “A multi-criteria interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 5908, pp. 303–312, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. Wang and X. Liu, “The multi-attribute decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein hybrid weighted geometric operator,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 66, pp. 1845–1856, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. F. Jin, L. Pei, H. Chen, and L. Zhou, “Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy continuous weighted entropy and its application to multi-criteria fuzzy group decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 59, pp. 132–141, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Liu and K. Qin, “Entropy on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft set,” in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, CIT 2015, 14th IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Communications, IUCC 2015, 13th IEEE International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, DASC 2015 and 13th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, PICom 2015, pp. 1360–1365, IEEE, Liverpool, UK, October 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Q.-s. Zhang, S. Jiang, B. Jia, and S. Luo, “Some information measures for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences. An International Journal, vol. 180, no. 24, pp. 5130–5145, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. M. Düğenci, “A new distance measure for interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to group decision making problems with incomplete weights information,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 41, pp. 120–134, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Q. Zhang, H. Xing, F. Liu, J. Ye, and P. Tang, “Some new entropy measures for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on distances and their relationships with similarity and inclusion measures,” Information Sciences. An International Journal, vol. 283, pp. 55–69, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. A. Mukherjee and A. K. Das, “Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft multi set theoretic approach to decision making problems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer, Communication and Control, IC4 2015, IEEE, Indore, India, September 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Mukherjee and A. K. Das, “Application of Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Set in Investment Decision Making,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communications, ICACC 2015, pp. 61–64, Kochi, India, September 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S.-M. Chen and W.-H. Tsai, “Multiple attribute decision making based on novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy geometric averaging operators,” Information Sciences, vol. 367-368, pp. 1045–1065, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Lin and Q. Zhang, “Note on continuous interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operator,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, pp. 1–8, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. S. Wan and J. Dong, “A possibility degree method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 237–256, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. H. Dadgostar and F. Afsari, “Image steganography based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy edge detection and modified LSB,” Journal of Information Security and Applications, vol. 30, pp. 94–104, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Rashmanlou, R. a. Borzooei, S. Samanta, and M. Pal, “Properties of interval valued intuitionistic (S,T) – Fuzzy graphs,” Pacific Science Review A: Natural Science and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  23. L. Dymova and P. Sevastjanov, “The operations on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values in the framework of Dempster-Shafer theory,” Information Sciences, vol. 360, pp. 256–272, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S.-P. Wan, F. Wang, G.-l. Xu, J.-y. Dong, and J. Tang, “An intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for group decision making with interval-valued fuzzy preference relations,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making. A Journal of Modeling and Computation Under Uncertainty, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 269–295, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. H. Liao, Z. Xu, and M. Xia, “Multiplicative consistency of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2969–2985, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. Fahmi, A. Derakhshan, and C. Kahraman, “Human resources management using interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ-IEEE 2015, IEEE, Istanbul, Turkey, August 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E. K. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene, S. H. R. Hajiagha, and S. S. Hashemi, “The interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MULTIMOORA method for group decision making in engineering,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 560690, 13 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. Liao and Z. Xu, “Multi-criteria decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1703–1717, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  29. C. A. Bana E Costa, J.-M. Corte, and J.-C. Vansnick, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer, 2005.
  30. B. Roy, “The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods,” Theory and Decision, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49–73, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. J. Figueira, V. Mousseau, and B. Roy, Electre Methods, vol. 78, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. M.-C. Wu and T.-Y. Chen, “The ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” in Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1383–1388, IEEE, Jeju Island, South Korea, August 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Wu, “Interval-valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy ELECTRE Method,” Asian International Journal of Science and Technology in Production and Manufacturing Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 33–40, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  34. J. Xu and F. Shen, “A new outranking choice method for group decision making under Atanassov’s interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 70, pp. 177–188, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. T.-Y. Chen, “An IVIF-ELECTRE-based outranking method for multiple criteria decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Technological and Econmic Development of Economy, pp. 1–37, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  36. S. S. Hashemi, S. H. R. Hajiagha, E. K. Zavadskas, and H. A. Mahdiraji, “making with ELECTRE III method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 40, pp. 1554–1564, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  37. T.-Y. Chen, “An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy permutation method with likelihood-based preference functions and its application to multiple criteria decision analysis,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 42, pp. 390–409, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. W. Chuantao, C. Xiaofei, and L. Baowen, “Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based on multi-attribute group decision making for business intelligence system,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 2203–2212, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Shahryari Nia, L. Olfat, A. Esmaeili, R. Rostamzadeh, and J. Antuchevičienė, “Using fuzzy Choquet Integral operator for supplier selection with environmental considerations,” Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 503–526, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. Kahraman, B. Öztayşi, and S. Çevik Onar, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multicriteria Evaluation of Outsource Manufacturers,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 1844–1849, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. X. Qi, C. Liang, and J. Zhang, “Generalized cross-entropy based group decision making with unknown expert and attribute weights under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 79, pp. 52–64, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S.-P. Wan and D.-F. Li, “Fuzzy mathematical programming approach to heterogeneous multiattribute decision-making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees,” Information Sciences. An International Journal, vol. 325, pp. 484–503, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  43. S. P. Wan and D. F. Li, “Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for heterogeneous multi attribute group decision making with Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 300–312, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. Z. Zhang, J. Chen, Y. Hu, J. Yang, Y. Ye, and J. Chen, “A dynamic fuzzy group decision making method for supplier selection,” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 2788–2794, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Mirjani, M. I. M. Wahab, and K. W. Li, “A multicriteria supplier selection framework with interval - Valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessment,” in Proceedings of the 2013 10th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, ICSSSM 2013, pp. 731–736, IEEE, Hong Kong, China, July 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S.-P. Wan and D.-F. Li, “Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees,” Omega, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 925–940, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. Y. Zhang, P. Li, Y. Wang, P. Ma, and X. Su, “Multiattribute decision making based on entropy under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, pp. 1–8, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  48. X. Chen, L. Yang, P. Wang, and W. Yue, “A fuzzy multicriteria group decision-making method with new entropy of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 827268, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Z. Yue and Y. Jia, “A method to aggregate crisp values into interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information for group decision making,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 2304–2317, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. H. L. Jiang and H. X. Yao, “Supplier selection based on FAHP-VIKOR-IVIFs,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 357-360, pp. 2703–2707, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. K. Govindan and M. B. Jepsen, “ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 250, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. C. Tan and X. Chen, “Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multicriteria group decision making based on VIKOR and choquet integral,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 656879, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. Chai, J. N. K. Liu, and E. W. T. Ngai, “Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 3872–3885, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. W. Ho, X. Xu, and P. K. Dey, “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. Liu, F. T. S. Chan, and W. Ran, “Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: An improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 55, pp. 37–47, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems. An International Journal in Information Science and Engineering, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 505–518, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  57. Z. S. Xu and Q. L. Da, “An overview of operators for aggregating information,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 18, pp. 953–969, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. L. a Zadeh, “Fuzzy logic systems: origin, concepts, and trends,” Science, vol. 80, pp. 16–18, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  59. A. Hafezalkotob and A. Hafezalkotob, “Fuzzy entropy-weighted MULTIMOORA method for materials selection,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1211–1226, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, and J. Wang, “Objective attributes weights determining based on shannon information entropy in hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 463930, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. T. L. Saaty, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” 1980.
  62. H. Liao and Z. Xu, “Priorities of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation based on multiplicative consistency,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1669–1681, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. Z. Xu and H. Liao, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. C. Spearman, “The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things,” American Journal of Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 72–101, 1904. View at Google Scholar
  65. F. R. L. Junior, L. Osiro, and L. C. R. Carpinetti, “A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 21, pp. 194–209, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. T. L. Saaty and M. S. Ozdemir, “Why the magic number seven plus or minus two,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 38, no. 3-4, pp. 233–244, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus