Interval values are initially used and these are converted to IFS using mean operator
Interval values
Total preorder
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Criteria weights
Given by DM
Given by DM
Given by DM
Given by DM
Concept adopted
Pareto dominance
Compromise solution
Preference function
Pareto dominance
Algorithm feature
Concordance and discordance measure
Ideal solution
Preference and indifference measure
Concordance and discordance measure
Metric adopted
Three categories of outranking relation
metric
Partial and total outranking
Two categories of outranking relation
Ranking procedure
Concordance and discordance matrices for both lower and upper bounds are constructed under all three categories. Finally, TOPSIS is used for linear ranking
Group utility, individual regret, and merit function are determined for both lower and upper bounds and finally linear ranking is obtained using ranking measures
Score measure is used along with function to form preference relations. Finally, linear ranking is obtained using partial and total ranking order
Score measure is used for the construction of concordance and discordance matrices. Single valued matrices are processed to obtain linear ranking using TOPSIS method
Ranking category
Outranking
Utility
Outranking
Outranking
Fuzziness handled
Better because the estimation is done in three levels and interval values are retained till the final stage of ranking
Normal
Normal
Weak because the estimation is done only in two levels and interval values are initially converted into single valued terms using score measure