Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 1594898, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1594898
Research Article

Calculation of Misjudgment Probability for Product Inspection Based on Measurement Uncertainty

1School of Instrument Science and Optoelectronic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
2Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory of Geometry Measurement Technology, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
3Fujian Province Institute of Metrology, Fuzhou 350003, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yin-bao Cheng; nc.ude.tufh.liam@oabniygnehc and Hou-de Liu; nc.ude.auhgnist.zs@dh.uil

Received 14 March 2017; Revised 28 October 2017; Accepted 13 November 2017; Published 7 December 2017

Academic Editor: Ludovic Chamoin

Copyright © 2017 Xiao-huai Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Cox and P. Harris, “GUM anniversary issue,” Metrologia, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. S141–S143, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, Uncertainty of Measurement -Part 3: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, International Standard Organization, ISO Copyright Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  3. JCGM 106:2012, Evaluation of Measurement Data – The Role of Measurement Uncertainty in Conformity Assessment, Joint Committee on Guides in Metrology, (JCGM), Paris, France, 2012.
  4. ISO 14253-1:2013, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) -Inspection by Measurement of Workpieces and Measuring Equipment -Part 1: Decision Rules for Proving Conformity Or Nonconformity with Specifications, International Standard Organization, ISO Copyright Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
  5. ISO 14253-2:2011, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) -Inspection by Measurement of Workpieces and Measuring Equipment -Part 2: Guide for The Estimation of Uncertainty in GPS Measurement, in Calibration of Measuring Equipment and in Product Verification, International Standard Organization, ISO Copyright Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  6. ISO 14253-3:2011, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) -Inspection by Measurement of Workpieces and Measuring Equipment -Part 3: Guidelines for Achieving Agreements on Measurement Uncertainty Statements, International Standard Organization, ISO Copyright Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  7. E. Desimoni and B. Brunetti, “Uncertainty of measurement and conformity assessment: A review,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 400, no. 6, pp. 1729–1741, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. R. Pendrill, “Optimised uncertainty and cost operating characteristics: New tools for conformity assessment. Application to geometrical product control in automobile industry,” International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 105–110, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. R. Pendrill, “Using measurement uncertainty in decision-making and conformity assessment,” Metrologia, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. S206–S218, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. V. Koshulyan and V. P. Malaychuk, “Conformance assessment for acceptance with measurement uncertainty and unknown global risks,” Measurement Techniques, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 1216–1223, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. D. Phillips and M. Krystek, “Assessment of conformity, decision rules and risk analysis,” Technisches Messen, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 237–245, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. B. Forbes, “Measurement uncertainty and optimized conformance assessment,” Measurement, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 808–814, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Djapic, L. Lukic, and A. Pavlovic, “Technical product risk assessment: standards, integration in the erm model and uncertainty modeling,” International Journal for Quality Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 159–176, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. Hinrichs, “Linking conformity assessment and measurement uncertainty - An example,” Technisches Messen, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 571–577, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Akkerhuis, J. de Mast, and T. Erdmann, “The statistical evaluation of binary tests without gold standard: Robustness of latent variable approaches,” Measurement, vol. 95, pp. 473–479, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. ISO2859-1:1999, Sampling Procedures for Inspection by Attributes -Part 1: Sampling Schemes Indexed by Acceptance Quality Limit (AQL) for Lot-By-Lot Inspection, International Standard Organization, ISO Copyright Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
  17. ISO/TS 15530-1:2013, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) -Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM): Technique for Determining the Uncertainty of Measurement -Part 1: Overview and Metrological Characteristics, International Standard Organization, ISO Copyright Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
  18. ISO 15530-3:2011, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) -Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM): Technique for Determining the Uncertainty of Measurement -Part 3: Use of Calibrated Workpieces or Measurement Standards, nternational Standard Organization, ISO Copyright Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  19. ISO/TS 15530-4:2008, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) -Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM): Technique for Determining the Uncertainty of Measurement -Part 4: Evaluating Task-Specific Measurement Uncertainty Using Simulation, International Standard Organization, ISO Copyright Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  20. H. L. Li, X. H. Chen, and Q. Yang, “Taskoriented measurement uncertainty evaluation of CMM under multi-strategies,” Chinese Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1772–1780, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  21. F. Aggogeri, G. Barbato, E. M. Barini, G. Genta, and R. Levi, “Measurement uncertainty assessment of Coordinate Measuring Machines by simulation and planned experimentation,” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Beaman and E. Morse, “Experimental evaluation of software estimates of task specific measurement uncertainty for CMMs,” Precision Engineering, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Ramu, J. A. Yagüe, R. J. Hocken, and J. Miller, “Development of a parametric model and virtual machine to estimate task specific measurement uncertainty for a five-axis multi-sensor coordinate measuring machine,” Precision Engineering, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 431–439, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W. Jakubiec, W. Płowucha, and M. Starczak, “Analytical estimation of coordinate measurement uncertainty,” Measurement, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2299–2308, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Cheung, M. Ren, L. Kong, and D. Whitehouse, “Modelling and analysis of uncertainty in the form characterization of ultra-precision freeform surfaces on coordinate measuring machines,” CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 481–484, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus