Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 3143502, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3143502
Research Article

Using an Integrated Group Decision Method Based on SVM, TFN-RS-AHP, and TOPSIS-CD for Cloud Service Supplier Selection

1College of Mechatronic Engineering, Beifang University of Nationalities, Yinchuan 750021, China
2College of Electric and Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450002, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Lian-hui Li; moc.361@iuhnail_il

Received 22 May 2016; Revised 16 October 2016; Accepted 27 October 2016; Published 31 January 2017

Academic Editor: Yong Deng

Copyright © 2017 Lian-hui Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Armbrust, A. Fox, R. Griffith et al., “Above the clouds: a Berkeley view of cloud computing,” Tech. Rep. EECS-2009-28, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. Buyya, C. S. Yeo, S. Venugopal, J. Broberg, and I. Brandic, “Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 599–616, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. I. Foster, Y. Zhao, I. Raicu, and S. Lu, “Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared,” in Proceedings of the Grid Computing Environments Workshop (GCE '08), pp. 1–10, Austin, Tex, USA, November 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Buyya, C. S. Yeo, and S. Venugopal, “Market-oriented cloud computing: vision, hype, and reality for delivering IT services as computing utilities,” in Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, (HPCC '08), pp. 5–13, IEEE, Dalian, China, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. M. Mell and T. Grance, SP 800-145. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, National Institute of Standards & Technology, 2011.
  6. R. Buyya, C. S. Yeo, and S. Venugopal, “Market-oriented cloud computing: vision, hype, and reality for delivering IT services as computing utilities,” in Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications (HPCC '08), pp. 5–13, IEEE, Dalian, China, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Q. Zhang, L. Cheng, and R. Boutaba, “Cloud computing: state-of-the-art and research challenges,” Journal of Internet Services & Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–18, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. J. Ferrer, F. Hernández, J. Tordsson et al., “OPTIMIS: a holistic approach to cloud service provisioning,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 66–77, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Tao, L. Zhang, H. Guo, Y.-L. Luo, and L. Ren, “Typical characteristics of cloud manufacturing and several key issues of cloud service composition,” Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 477–486, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. W. Wang and X. M. Liu, “A solution for single point of failure of cloud computing platform in electric power corporation,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 519-520, pp. 1325–1328, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Siegel and J. Perdue, “Cloud services measures for global use: the Service Measurement Index (SMI),” in Proceedings of the Annual SRII Global Conference (SRII '12), pp. 411–415, San Jose, Calif, USA, July 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Monteiro and A. Vasconcelos, “Survey on important cloud service provider attributes using the SMI framework,” Procedia Technology, vol. 9, pp. 253–259, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Koehler, A. Anandasivam, M. A. Dan et al., “Cloud services from a consumer perspective,” in Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS '10), p. 329, Lima, Peru, August 2010.
  14. S. K. Garg, S. Versteeg, and R. Buyya, “A framework for ranking of cloud computing services,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1012–1023, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y.-F. Dong and G. Guo, “Evaluation and selection approach for cloud manufacturing service based on template and global trust degree,” Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 207–214, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. M. Grisi, L. Guerra, and G. Naviglio, “Supplier performance evaluation for green supply chain management,” in Business Performance Measurement and Management, pp. 149–163, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. G. Büyüközkan and G. Çifçi, “A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information,” Computers in Industry, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 164–174, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Bai and J. Sarkis, “Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1200–1210, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. Meiqing and L. Yongjun, “Evaluation of suppliers with fuzzy inputs and outputs based on DEA game cross-efficiency model,” Industrial Engineering and Management, no. 1, pp. 95–99, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  20. M.-L. Tseng and A. S. F. Chiu, “Evaluating firm's green supply chain management in linguistic preferences,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 40, pp. 22–31, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Kannan, K. Govindan, and S. Rajendran, “Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: a case study from Singapore,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 96, pp. 194–208, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Awasthi, S. S. Chauhan, and S. K. Goyal, “A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 370–378, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W.-C. Yeh and M.-C. Chuang, “Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 4244–4253, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Wu, Q. W. Cao, and H. Li, “A method for choosing green supplier based on COWA operator under fuzzy linguistic decision-making,” Journal of Industrial Engineering & Engineering Management, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 61–65, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  25. X. Li, C. Zhao, X. Li et al., “Selection of suppliers of vehicle components based on green supply chain,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 1588–1591, Beijing, China, October 2009.
  26. Y. Ge, “Research on green suppliers' evaluation based on AHP & genetic algorithm,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing Systems (ICSPS '09), pp. 615–619, IEEE, Chengdu, China, May 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. J. Kuo, Y. C. Wang, and F. C. Tien, “Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1161–1170, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. J. Kuo and Y. J. Lin, “Supplier selection using analytic network process and data envelopment analysis,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 2852–2863, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. Büyüközkan and G. Çifçi, “A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 3000–3011, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. Shaw, R. Shankar, S. S. Yadav, and L. S. Thakur, “Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 8182–8192, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. Kannan, A. Noorul, P. Sasikumar, and A. Subramaniam, “Analysis and selection of green suppliers using interpretative structural modelling and analytic hierarchy process,” International Journal of Management and Decision Making, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 163–182, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. X. X. Luo and S. H. Peng, “Research on the vendor evaluation and selection based on AHP and TOPSIS in green supply chain,” Soft Science, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 53–56, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  33. P. J. García Nieto, E. García-Gonzalo, J. R. Alonso Fernández, and C. Díaz Muñiz, “A hybrid PSO optimized SVM-based model for predicting a successful growth cycle of the Spirulina platensis from raceway experiments data,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 291, article no. 9963, pp. 293–303, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  34. H. Zhang, A. C. Berg, M. Maire et al., “Discriminative nearest neighbor classification for visual category recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 2126–2136, New York, NY, USA, June 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. Z. Pawlak, “Rough sets,” International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 341–356, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. K. K. Yen, S. Ghoshray, and G. Roig, “A linear regression model using triangular fuzzy number coefficients,” Fuzzy Sets & Systems, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 167–177, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. P. Yao and H. Z. Shen, “The multi-attribute group decision making method based on interval valued triangular fuzzy number,” Mathematics in Practice & Theory, vol. 20, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  38. J. Ye, “Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method using entropy weights-based correlation coefficients of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Applied Mathematical Modelling. Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 3864–3870, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  39. P. Wang, D.-H. Zhang, B. Chen, S. Li, and G.-H. Ma, “Evaluation of multi-process plans based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and grey relational analysis,” Journal of Aerospace Power, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2075–2085, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. W. Ying, X. D. Jiang, and Z. Lu, “Research on the evaluation of science and technological awards based on improved CRITIC method and cloud model,” Journal of Hunan University, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 118–124, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  41. T. Rashid, I. Beg, and S. M. Husnine, “Robot selection by using generalized interval-valued fuzzy numbers with TOPSIS,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 21, pp. 462–468, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. L. Shulin and Q. Wanhua, “The TOPSIS angle measure evaluation method for MADM,” System Engineering-Theory & Practice, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 12–17, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  43. H. Xiaoyi and T. Jingxin, “Revised TOPSIS method based on vertical projection distance-vertical projection method,” System Engineering—Theory & Practice, vol. 1, pp. 114–119, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  44. K. Q. Zhao, “Set pair and set pair analysis-a new concept and systematic analysis method,” in Proceedings of the National Conference on System Theory and Regional Planning, pp. 87–91, 1989.
  45. W. S. Wang, J. L. Jin, J. Ding, and Y. Li, “A new approach to water resources system assessment—set pair analysis method,” Science in China, Series E: Technological Sciences, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 3017–3023, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus