Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 3460721, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3460721
Research Article

Stochastic versus Deterministic Approach to Coordinated Supply Chain Scheduling

Department of Operations Research, AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

Correspondence should be addressed to Tadeusz Sawik; lp.ude.rk-fyc@kiwashg

Received 9 January 2017; Accepted 11 May 2017; Published 19 June 2017

Academic Editor: Anna Pandolfi

Copyright © 2017 Tadeusz Sawik. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. V. Blackhurst, K. P. Scheibe, and D. J. Johnson, “Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for the automotive industry,” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 143–165, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Hoffmann, H. Schiele, and K. Krabbendam, “Uncertainty, supply risk management and their impact on performance,” Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 199–211, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Park, P. Hong, and J. J. Roh, “Supply chain lessons from the catastrophic natural disaster in Japan,” Business Horizons, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 75–85, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Haraguchi and U. Lall, “Flood risks and impacts: A case study of Thailand's floods in 2011 and research questions for supply chain decision making,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 14, pp. 256–272, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Fujimoto and Y. W. Park, “Balancing supply chain competitiveness and robustness through "virtual dual sourcing": Lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 147, pp. 429–436, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Matsuo, “Implications of the Tohoku earthquake for Toyota's coordination mechanism: supply chain disruption of automotive semiconductors,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 161, pp. 217–227, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. R. Marszewska, “Implications of seismic hazard in Japan on toyota supply chain disruption risks,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Industrial Logistics, (ICIL '16), pp. 178–185, Zakopane, Poland, October 2016. View at Scopus
  8. A. Z. Zeng and Y. Xia, “Building a mutually beneficial partnership to ensure backup supply,” Omega, vol. 52, pp. 77–91, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Ş. S. Erengüç, N. C. Simpson, and A. J. Vakharia, “Integrated production/distribution planning in supply chains: an invited review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 219–236, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Lei, S. Liu, A. Ruszczynski, and S. Park, “On the integrated production, inventory, and distribution routing problem,” IIE Transactions, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 955–970, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Kaur, A. Kanda, and S. G. Deshmukh, “A graph theoretic approach for supply chain coordination,” International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 321–341, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Choi, W. Yeung, and T. C. E. Cheng, “Scheduling and co-ordination of multi-suppliers single-warehouse-operator single-manufacturer supply chains with variable production rates and storage costs,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 2593–2601, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Liu and L. G. Papageorgiou, “Multiobjective optimisation of production, distribution and capacity planning of global supply chains in the process industry,” Omega, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 369–382, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Z. L. Chen, “Integrated production and outbound distribution scheduling: review and extensions,” Operations Research, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 130–148, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Sawik, “Coordinated supply chain scheduling,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 437–451, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Tomlin, “On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks,” Management Science, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 639–657, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Ivanov, B. Sokolov, and A. Dolgui, “The Ripple effect in supply chains: Trade-off 'efficiency-flexibility- resilience' in disruption management,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 2154–2172, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Ivanov, A. Pavlov, and B. Sokolov, “Optimal distribution (re)planning in a centralized multi-stage supply network under conditions of the ripple effect and structure dynamics,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 237, no. 2, pp. 758–770, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. D. Ivanov, A. Pavlov, A. Dolgui, D. Pavlov, and B. Sokolov, “Disruption-driven supply chain (re)-planning and performance impact assessment with consideration of pro-active and recovery policies,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 90, pp. 7–24, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. J. Schmitt and L. V. Snyder, “Infinite-horizon models for inventory control under yield uncertainty and disruptions,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 850–862, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. J. Schmitt, S. A. Sun, L. V. Snyder, and Z.-J. M. Shen, “Centralization versus decentralization: Risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions,” Omega, vol. 52, pp. 201–212, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. V. Snyder, Z. Atan, P. Peng, Y. Rong, A. J. Schmitt, and B. Sinsoysal, “OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review,” IIE Transactions, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 89–109, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. Sawik, “Integrated selection of suppliers and scheduling of customer orders in the presence of supply chain disruption risks,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 51, no. 23-24, pp. 7006–7022, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. Sawik, “Optimization of cost and service level in the presence of supply chain disruption risks: Single vs. multiple sourcing,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 51, pp. 11–20, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. Sawik, “Integrated supply, production and distribution scheduling under disruption risks,” Omega, vol. 62, pp. 131–144, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. Sawik, “Integrated supply chain scheduling under multi-level disruptions,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1515–1520, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Kall and J. Mayer, Stochastic Linear Programming: Models, Theory, and Computation, vol. 156 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer, New York, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. I. N. Durbach and T. J. Stewart, “Using expected values to simplify decision making under uncertainty,” Omega, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 312–330, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. F. Maggioni and S. W. Wallace, “Analyzing the quality of the expected value solution in stochastic programming,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 200, pp. 37–54, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. T. Sawik, “Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks,” Omega, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 194–208, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. Delage, S. Arroyo, and Y. Ye, “The value of stochastic modeling in two-stage stochastic programs with cost uncertainty,” Operations Research, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1377–1393, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. T. Sawik, Scheduling in Supply Chains Using Mixed Integer Programming, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  33. T. Sawik, Supply Chain Disruption Management Using Stochastic Mixed Integer Programming, vol. 256 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer, New York, 2017, http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319588223.
  34. D. E. Whitney, J. Luo, and D. A. Heller, “The benefits and constraints of temporary sourcing diversification in supply chain disruption and recovery,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 238–250, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus