Research Article
Improving the Accuracy of the Charge Simulation Method for Numerical Conformal Mapping
Table 3
Comparison of CUP time (s) for Example
2.
| Charge points | | | | | | | |
| Amano’s method | 0.2528 | 0.3625 | 0.3071 | 0.3582 | 0.4211 | 0.5469 | 0.6525 | Our method | 0.0162 | 0.0131 | 0.0215 | 0.0159 | 0.0171 | 0.0191 | 0.0221 |
|
|