Research Article
Strip Surface Defects Recognition Based on PSO-RS&SOCP-SVM Algorithm
Table 6
The classification and recognition performance comparison of SVM, RVM, and PSO-RS&SOCP-SVM.
| Defect type | Rust | Scratch | Orange peel | Bubble | Surface crack | Rolled-in scale |
| The number of test samples | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | SVM | | | | | | | Recognition rate (%) | 99 | 97 | 98 | 96 | 100 | 95 | The average running time (ms) | 63.5 | 67.6 | 78.6 | 80.2 | 69.3 | 68.5 | RVM | | | | | | | Recognition rate (%) | 100 | 98 | 99 | 98 | 100 | 96 | The average running time (ms) | 78.4 | 82.3 | 82.1 | 88.5 | 79.4 | 77.1 | PSO-RS&SOCP-SVM | | | | | | | Recognition rate (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 99 | 100 | 98 | The average running time (ms) | 52.3 | 60.5 | 55.8 | 62.8 | 60.1 | 58.5 |
|
|