Research Article

Product Form Design Model Based on Multiobjective Optimization and Multicriteria Decision-Making

Table 5

Factor loadings of 20 pairwise adjectives using four factors.

Pairwise adjectivesFactor 1Factor 2Factor 3Factor 4

Traditional–Modern0.9560.1080.0960.032
Common–Exclusive0.9460.257−0.048−0.022
Usual–High-tech0.9380.2930.0650.037
Static–Dynamic0.920−0.0340.143−0.001
Nostalgic–Avant-garde0.9000.3960.0690.026
Straight–Streamlined0.8620.3080.196−0.121
Cheap–Expensive0.8010.545−0.132−0.054
Calming–Exciting0.6880.6180.0040.130
Dull–Vivid0.667−0.3270.6220.013
Coarse–Delicate0.6560.6520.2640.128
Uncomfortable–Comfortable0.1040.943−0.2290.018
Awkward–Elegant0.4040.9020.0630.069
Ugly–Beautiful0.4170.8740.0830.121
Fragile–Strong0.2240.854−0.3330.253
Light–Heavy−0.2970.829−0.3410.247
Plain–Luxurious0.6190.7660.0740.030
Somber–Delightful0.6140.7230.2450.118
Orthogonal–Rounded0.102−0.0750.8900.015
Complex–Simple−0.0600.1270.3090.837
Feminine–Masculine0.0550.220−0.3390.834
Final statistics
Eigenvalue8.3406.6901.9111.609
Percentage of variance41.69933.4509.5578.046
Cumulative percentage41.69975.14884.70692.752

The bold numbers indicate the groups of adjectives associated with factors 1–4.