Research Article

A Mathematical Programming Approach to Brand Efficiency of Smartphones in the US Market

Table 5

Annual qualitative analysis of smartphone brands ( smartphone-year observations).

YearBrandQ1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Q10

2013Apple5.004.003.144.863.004.003.003.293.864.86
2013BlackBerry3.804.203.204.802.603.803.002.802.604.40
2013HTC4.504.704.404.502.904.003.002.702.603.50
2013LG4.804.804.604.402.403.803.002.802.004.00
2013Motorola4.804.804.603.803.004.003.603.802.603.60
2013Nokia4.005.005.005.003.004.003.002.003.003.00
2013Samsung4.844.794.794.632.794.323.053.372.533.79
2013Sony4.004.004.004.502.504.003.503.502.503.50
Mean4.474.544.224.562.773.993.143.032.713.83

2014Apple5.004.004.005.003.004.003.004.204.005.00
2014BlackBerry4.384.504.254.632.634.003.883.632.884.13
2014HTC4.824.915.004.912.644.004.093.182.734.00
2014LG4.904.804.704.802.803.703.903.202.303.90
2014Motorola5.005.005.004.803.004.003.604.003.003.80
2014Nokia4.835.005.005.003.004.004.004.002.673.50
2014Samsung4.954.845.004.792.844.373.954.113.003.58
2014Sony5.005.005.005.003.004.004.004.003.004.00
Mean4.864.764.744.872.864.013.803.792.953.99

2015Apple5.004.003.895.003.004.003.003.894.005.00
2015BlackBerry4.004.434.004.572.713.863.863.572.864.00
2015HTC4.704.704.704.902.403.903.602.903.003.80
2015LG4.734.874.674.202.874.074.273.332.873.47
2015Motorola5.004.334.834.172.834.173.833.003.004.17
2015Nokia4.574.294.434.713.003.713.293.293.003.43
2015Samsung4.674.714.764.622.814.144.243.623.383.52
2015Sony4.005.005.005.003.004.004.004.004.004.00
Mean4.584.544.534.652.833.983.763.453.263.92

Note. Q1 = ease of use, Q2 = messaging, Q3 = Web browsing, Q4 = display quality, Q5 = voice quality, Q6 = phoning, Q7 = battery life, Q8 = camera image quality, Q9 = camera video quality, and Q10 = portability.