Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 7126856, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7126856
Research Article

Dynamic Stochastic Multiattribute Decision-Making That Considers Stochastic Variable Variance Characteristics under Time-Sequence Contingency Environments

College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Zao-li Yang; nc.ude.tujb@iloazgnay

Received 19 October 2016; Revised 21 January 2017; Accepted 6 February 2017; Published 26 February 2017

Academic Editor: Peide Liu

Copyright © 2017 Zao-li Yang and Lu-cheng Huang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Q. Wang and J. Ren, “Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making method based on the WC-OWA operator,” Control and Decision, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1429–1432, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. C. Tan, W. H. Ip, and X. Chen, “Stochastic multiple criteria decision making with aspiration level based on prospect stochastic dominance,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 70, pp. 231–241, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. R. Yager and N. Alajlan, “Probability weighted means as surrogates for stochastic dominance in decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 66, pp. 92–98, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. V. Prado-Lopez, T. P. Seager, M. Chester, L. Laurin, M. Bernardo, and S. Tylock, “Stochastic multi-attribute analysis (SMAA) as an interpretation method for comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA),” International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 405–416, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Jalali, M. Seifbarghy, J. Sadeghi, and S. Ahmadi, “Optimizing a bi-objective reliable facility location problem with adapted stochastic measures using tuned-parameter multi-objective algorithms,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 95, pp. 45–57, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. T. Jang, “Method for hybrid stochastic multiple attribute decision making considering decision maker's psychological behavior,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 22, pp. 78–84, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  7. H. Yu, P. Liu, and F. Jin, “Research on the stochastic hybrid multi-attribute decision making method based on prospect theory,” Scientia Iranica, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1105–1119, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Hu and L. Yang, “Dynamic stochastic multi-criteria decision making method based on cumulative prospect theory and set pair analysis,” Systems Engineering Procedia, vol. 1, pp. 432–439, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. J. Hao, J. J. Zhu, and S. F. Liu, “A method for multi-stage stochastic multi-criteria decision making concerning prospect theory,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 1, pp. 73–81, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  10. X. Liang and Y. P. Jiang, “Method of stochastic multi-attribute decision making with 2-tuple aspirations considering regret behavior,” Journal of Systems Engineering, vol. 30, pp. 19–27, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  11. X.-F. Wang and X.-J. Yang, “Dynamic stochastic multiple attribute decision making method with incomplete certain information,” System Engineering Theory and Practice, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 332–338, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Sun and X.-F. Xu, “A dynamic stochastic decision-making method based on discrete time sequences,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 105, pp. 23–28, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Liu and X. Yu, “2-dimension uncertain linguistic power generalized weighted aggregation operator and its application in multiple attribute group decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 57, pp. 69–80, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Liu and L. Shi, “The generalized hybrid weighted average operator based on interval neutrosophic hesitant set and its application to multiple attribute decision making,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 457–471, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z. S. Xu and R. R. Yager, “Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 48, pp. 246–262, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Tan and X. Chen, “Dynamic similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 511–519, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. J. H. Park, H. J. Cho, and Y. C. Kwun, “Extension of the VIKOR method to dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 731–744, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. Z. Yue, “TOPSIS-based group decision-making methodology in intuitionistic fuzzy setting,” Information Sciences, vol. 277, pp. 141–153, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. Q. Cao, J. Wu, and C. Liang, “An intuitionsitic fuzzy judgement matrix and TOPSIS integrated multi-criteria decision making method for green supplier selection,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 117–126, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. P. Liu and Y. Liu, “An approach to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy power generalized aggregation operator,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 291–304, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Liu and F. Jin, “A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on weighted geometric aggregation operators of interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers,” Applied Mathematical Modelling. Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 2498–2509, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. Z.-S. Chen and Y.-L. Li, “Approach for normal triangular fuzzy stochastic multiple attribute decision making based on prospect mean-variance rule,” Control and Decision, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1239–1249, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Liu and Y. Wang, “Multiple attribute decision-making method based on single-valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 25, no. 7-8, pp. 2001–2010, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Li, X. Liu, and Y. Chen, “Supplier selection using axiomatic fuzzy set and TOPSIS methodology in supply chain management,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making. A Journal of Modeling and Computation Under Uncertainty, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 147–176, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. P. D. Liu and L. L. Shi, “The generalized hybrid weighted average operator based on interval neutrosophic hesitant set and its application to multiple attribute decision making,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 457–471, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Z. Xu, “On multi-period multi-attribute decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 164–171, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. Sadiq and S. Tesfamariam, “Probability density functions based weights for ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators: an example of water quality indices,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 1350–1368, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. X. Cao, G. W. Liu, and X. M. Fu, “Analysis on group decision making of industry-university-research partners choice based on preferences and dynamic intuition,” Operations Research Management Science, vol. 4, pp. 33–41, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  29. Y. Liu, J. Forrest, S.-F. Liu, H.-H. Zhao, and L.-R. Jian, “Dynamic multiple attribute grey incidence decision making mothed based on interval valued intuitionisitc fuzzy number,” Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1303–1321, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. X.-Z. Zhang, C.-X. Zhu, and L. Zhu, “A method of dynamic multi-attribute decision making based on variable weight,” Control and Decision, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 494–498, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. X.-H. Xu and Q.-F. Wan, “Method for continuous stochastic multi-attribute large group decision making,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2084–2089, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. V. J. Easton and J. H. McColl, Statistics Glossary v1.1, 1997.
  33. R. Lahdelma, S. Makkonen, and P. Salminen, “Multivariate Gaussian criteria in SMAA,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 170, no. 3, pp. 957–970, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  34. R. R. Yager, “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 18, pp. 183–190, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  35. X. Z. Zhang and C. X. Zhu, “Generalized precedence ordering method with ranking preference for time series-based multi-attribute decision making,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 22, pp. 105–111, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  36. S. B. Graves and J. L. Ringuest, “Probabilistic dominance criteria for comparing uncertain alternatives: a tutorial,” Omega, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 346–357, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. X. Y. Hua and J. X. Tan, “Revised TOPSIS method based on vertical projection distance-vertical projection method,” Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, vol. 1, pp. 114–119, 2004. View at Google Scholar