Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 7430248, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7430248
Research Article

Supplier Selection by Coupling-Attribute Combinatorial Analysis

School of Management, The State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing System Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xinyu Sun; nc.ude.utjx@nus.uynix

Received 14 May 2017; Revised 5 September 2017; Accepted 14 September 2017; Published 25 October 2017

Academic Editor: Danielle Morais

Copyright © 2017 Xinyu Sun. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. de Boer, E. Labro, and P. Morlacchi, “A review of methods supporting supplier selection,” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 75–89, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. N. Nobar and M. Setak, “A new approach for supplier selection process from the features of second layer suppliers point of view,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  3. N. Aissaoui, M. Haouari, and E. Hassini, “Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling: a review,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 3516–3540, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Bruno, E. Esposito, A. Genovese, and R. Passaro, “AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: problems and perspectives,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 159–172, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Z. Degraeve, E. Labro, and F. Roodhooft, “An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 34–58, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Genovese, S. C. Koh, G. Bruno, and E. Esposito, “Greener supplier selection: state of the art and some empirical evidence,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2868–2886, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Ho, X. Xu, and P. K. Dey, “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, Eds., Combinatorial Auctions, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, 2006.
  9. J. C. R. Giacon, H. T. Y. Yoshizaki, and G. Montibeller, “Supplier selection by multi-attribute combinatorial bidding,” in Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS '14, pp. 1132–1141, January 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. H. Rothkopf, A. Pekeč, and R. M. Harstad, “Computationally manageable combinational auctions,” Management Science, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1131–1147, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. X. Y. Sun, P. Ji, L. Y. Sun, and Y. L. Wang, “Positioning multiple decoupling points in a supply network,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 943–956, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. W. Dickson, “An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions,” Journal of Purchasing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  13. C. A. Weber, J. R. Current, and W. C. Benton, “Vendor selection criteria and methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 2–18, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. X. Y. Sun, L. Y. Sun, Y. L. Wang, and B. J. Wu, “An investigation on the application of advanced manufacturing mode in China,” Chinese Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 2, pp. 6–9, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  15. C.-J. Lin and H.-H. Kuo, “Multiple comparisons with the best for supplier selection,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1083–1092, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Sharma and S. Balan, “An integrative supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, TOPSIS and multi criteria goal programming,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1123–1130, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. A. Weber and J. R. Current, “A multiobjective approach to vendor selection,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Chai, J. N. K. Liu, and E. W. T. Ngai, “Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 3872–3885, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. T. S. Chan, N. Kumar, M. K. Tiwari, H. C. W. Lau, and K. L. Choy, “Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 46, no. 14, pp. 3825–3857, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Wu and J. Blackhurst, “Supplier evaluation and selection: an augmented DEA approach,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 47, no. 16, pp. 4593–4608, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C.-T. Lin, C.-B. Chen, and Y.-C. Ting, “An ERP model for supplier selection in electronics industry,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1760–1765, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. N. Liao and H. P. Kao, “An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 10803–10811, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y.-T. Lin, C.-L. Lin, H.-C. Yu, and G.-H. Tzeng, “A novel hybrid MCDM approach for outsourcing vendor selection: a case study for a semiconductor company in Taiwan,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 4796–4804, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Hlioui, A. Gharbi, and A. Hajji, “Joint supplier selection, production and replenishment of an unreliable manufacturing-oriented supply chain,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 187, pp. 53–67, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. W. D. Cook, J. Zhu, G. Bi, and F. Yang, “Network DEA: additive efficiency decomposition,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 1122–1129, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Chen and H. Yan, “Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 147–155, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. S. Park, C. Ok, and C. Ha, “A stochastic simulation-based holistic evaluation approach with DEA for vendor selection,” Computers & Operations Research, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. M. R. Asadabadi, “A customer based supplier selection process that combines quality function deployment, the analytic network process and a Markov chain,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 263, no. 3, pp. 1049–1062, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. X. Chen and J. Zhang, “Production control and supplier selection under demand disruptions,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 421–446, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Talluri and R. Narasimhan, “Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 543–552, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. Z. Sinuany-Stern, A. Mehrez, and Y. Hadad, “An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units,” International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 109–124, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  33. Y.-M. Wang and P. Jiang, “Alternative mixed integer linear programming models for identifying the most efficient decision making unit in data envelopment analysis,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 546–553, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Lisnianski, “Extended block diagram method for a multi-state system reliability assessment,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1601–1607, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. L. Fisher, “What is the right supply chain for your product,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 105–116, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  36. E. Feitzinger and H. L. Lee, “Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: the power of postponement,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 116–121, 1997. View at Google Scholar