Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 7635972, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7635972
Research Article

A Method to Identify the Incomplete Framework of Discernment in Evidence Theory

School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710072, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Wen Jiang

Received 30 July 2017; Revised 16 October 2017; Accepted 5 November 2017; Published 10 December 2017

Academic Editor: Anna M. Gil-Lafuente

Copyright © 2017 Wen Jiang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. P. Dempster, “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 38, pp. 325–339, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1976. View at MathSciNet
  3. X. Deng and W. Jiang, “An evidential axiomatic design approach for decision making using the evaluation of belief structure satisfaction to uncertain target values,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 15–32, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. X. Su, S. Mahadevan, W. Han, and Y. Deng, “Combining dependent bodies of evidence,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 634–644, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. Jiang, B. Wei, X. Liu, X. Li, and H. Zheng, “Intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operator based on entropy and its application in decision making,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 49–67, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. F. Xiao, “An Intelligent Complex Event Processing with D Numbers under Fuzzy Environment,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 3713518, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Fu, J.-B. Yang, and S.-L. Yang, “A group evidential reasoning approach based on expert reliability,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 246, no. 3, pp. 886–893, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. L. Chen, X. Zhou, F. Xiao, Y. Deng, and S. Mahadevan, “Evidential Analytic Hierarchy Process Dependence Assessment Methodology in Human Reliability Analysis,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 123–133, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. W. Jiang and S. Wang, “An uncertainty measure for interval-valued evidences,” International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 631–644, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  10. X. Deng, F. Xiao, and Y. Deng, “An improved distance-based total uncertainty measure in belief function theory,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 898–915, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Denœux, S. Sriboonchitta, and O. Kanjanatarakul, “Evidential clustering of large dissimilarity data,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 106, pp. 179–195, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Zheng, Y. Deng, and Y. Hu, “Fuzzy evidential influence diagram and its evaluation algorithm,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 131, pp. 28–45, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. D. Han, W. Liu, J. Dezert, and Y. Yang, “A novel approach to pre-extracting support vectors based on the theory of belief functions,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 110, pp. 210–223, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. Y. Deng, “Deng entropy,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 91, pp. 549–553, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. X. Zhou, X. Deng, Y. Deng, and S. Mahadevan, “Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on D numbers and AHP,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 313, pp. 243–252, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H.-C. Liu, Q.-L. Lin, and M.-L. Ren, “Fault diagnosis and cause analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and dynamic adaptive fuzzy Petri nets,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 899–908, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Xu, C. Hu, F. Yang et al., “Data-driven inter-turn short circuit fault detection in induction machines,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25055–25068, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. H.-C. Liu, L. Liu, Q.-L. Lin, and N. Liu, “Knowledge acquisition and representation using fuzzy evidential reasoning and dynamic adaptive fuzzy petri nets,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1059–1072, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. X. Wang, F. Yang, H. Wei, and L. Ji, “A risk assessment model of uncertainty system based on set-valued mapping,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 3155–3162, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. X. Zhang, S. Mahadevan, and X. Deng, “Reliability analysis with linguistic data: An evidential network approach,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 162, pp. 111–121, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. Jiang, C. Xie, M. Zhuang, and Y. Tang, “Failure mode and effects analysis based on a novel fuzzy evidential method,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 57, pp. 672–683, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. H.-C. Liu, J.-X. You, X.-J. Fan, and Q.-L. Lin, “Failure mode and effects analysis using D numbers and grey relational projection method,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 4670–4679, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H.-C. Liu, L. Liu, and Q.-L. Lin, “Fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning and belief rule-based methodology,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 23–36, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. He, L. Hu, X. Guan, Y. Deng, and D. Han, “New method for measuring the degree of conflict among general basic probability assignments,” Science China Information Sciences, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 312–321, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. E. Lefevre, O. Colot, and P. Vannoorenberghe, “Belief function combination and conflict management,” Information Fusion, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 149–162, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Haenni, “Are alternatives to Dempster's rule of combination real alternatives? Comments on "About the belief function combination and the conflict management problem" - Lefevre et al,” Information Fusion, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 237–239, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. K. Murphy, “Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. Yong, S. WenKang, Z. ZhenFu, and L. Qi, “Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 489–493, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. Smets and R. Kennes, “The transferable belief model,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 191–234, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. W. Jiang and J. Zhan, “A modified combination rule in generalized evidence theory,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 630–640, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C.-C. Chou, L.-J. Liu, S.-F. Huang, J.-M. Yih, and T.-C. Han, “An evaluation of airline service quality using the fuzzy weighted SERVQUAL method,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2117–2128, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. C. Chou, “A generalized similarity measure for fuzzy numbers,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1147–1155, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. Kahraman, S. C. Onar, and B. Oztaysi, “Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 637–666, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. X. Deng, D. Han, J. Dezert, Y. Deng, and Y. Shyr, “Evidence Combination from an Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2070–2082, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. W. Jiang, A correlation coefficient of belief functions, https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05497.
  36. A. L. Jousselme, D. Grenier, and É. Bossé, “A new distance between two bodies of evidence,” Information Fusion, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91–101, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. W. Jiang, J. Zhan, D. Zhou, and X. Li, “A method to determine generalized basic probability assignment in the open world,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 3878634, 11 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. J. Zhang and Y. Deng, “A method to determine basic probability assignment in the open world and its application in data fusion and classification,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 934–951, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Sammut and G. I. Webb, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.