Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 7861945, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7861945
Research Article

Mode Choice Model for Public Transport with Categorized Latent Variables

School of Traffic & Transportation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, No. 66 Xuefu Rd., Nan’an District, Chongqing City 40074, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Shoujie Li; moc.liamg@ileijuohs

Received 2 May 2017; Accepted 10 July 2017; Published 14 August 2017

Academic Editor: Luca D’Acierno

Copyright © 2017 Jian Chen and Shoujie Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. S. Koppelman and E. I. Pas, “Travel-choice behavior: models of perceptions, preference, and choice,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 765, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. Ben-Akiva, A. de Palma, and P. Kanaroglou, “Dynamic model of peak period traffic congestion with elastic arrival rates,” Transportation Science, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 164–181, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. S. Koppelman and C. H. Wen, “Alternative nested logit models: structure, properties and estimation,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 32B, no. 5, pp. 289–298, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. A. Hensher and A. J. Reyes, “Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport,” Transportation, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 341–361, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Schwanen, “The determinants of shopping duration on workdays in The Netherlands,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 35–48, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Mitra and R. N. Buliung, “Exploring differences in school travel mode choice behaviour between children and youth,” Transport Policy, vol. 42, pp. 4–11, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Liu, Y. O. Susilo, and A. Karlström, “The influence of weather characteristics variability on individual's travel mode choice in different seasons and regions in Sweden,” Transport Policy, vol. 41, pp. 147–158, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. D. Palma and D. Rochat, “Mode choices for trips to work in Geneva: an empirical analysis,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Spearman, “General intelligence objectively determined and measured,” The American Journal of Psychology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 201–293, 1904. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. T. P. Gerber, “Market, state, or don't know? education, economic ideology, and voting in contemporary Russia,” Social Forces, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 477–521, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Mezzetti and F. C. Billari, “Bayesian correlated factor analysis of socio-demographic indicators,” Statistical Methods & Applications. Journal of the Italian Statistical Society, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 223–241, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. L. R. Fabrigar, R. C. MacCallum, D. T. Wegener, and E. J. Strahan, “Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research,” Psychological Methods, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 272–299, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. A. Bollen, “Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 53, pp. 605–634, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Ashok, W. R. Dillon, and S. Yuan, “Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 31–46, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Ebbes, M. Wedel, U. Böckenholt, and T. Steerneman, “Solving and testing for regressor-error (in)dependence when no instrumental variables are available: With new evidence for the effect of education on income,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 365–392, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Train, D. McFadden, and A. Goett, “The incorporation of attitudes in econometric models of consumer choice,” Working Paper, Cambridge Systematics, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Ben-Akiva and B. Boccara, “Integrated framework for travel behavior analysis,” in Proceedings of the The International Association of Travel Behavior Research (IATBR) conference, Aix-en-Provence, France, 1987.
  18. M. Ben-Akiva, D. McFadden, T. Gärling et al., “Extended framework for modeling choice behavior,” Marketing Letters, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 187–203, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. H. Pendleton and J. S. Shonkwiler, “Valuing bundled attributes: a latent characteristics approach,” Land Economics, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 118–129, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Morikawa, M. Ben-Akiva, and D. McFadden, “Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preferences and psychometric data,” in Econometric Models in Marketing Advances in Econometrics: A Research Annual, vol. 16, Elsevier Science, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  21. T. Morikawa, M. Ben-Akiva, and D. McFadden, “Incorporating psychometric data in econometric choice models,” Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  22. T. F. Golob, “Joint models of attitudes and behavior in evaluation of the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 495–514, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Mitra, S. Washington, E. Dumbaugh, and M. D. Meyer, “Governors highway safety associations and transportation planning: exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling,” Journal of Transportation and Statistics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–75, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  24. J.-Y. Lee, J.-H. Chung, and B. Son, “Analysis of traffic accident size for Korean highway using structural equation models,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1955–1963, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. A. Gopinath, Modeling heterogeneity in discrete choice processes: application to travel demand. [Ph. D. Dissertation], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995.
  26. J. Walker and M. Ben-Akiva, “Generalized random utility model,” Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 303–343, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. M. V. Johansson, T. Heldt, and P. Johansson, “The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 507–525, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. F. Yáñez, S. Raveau, and J. D. D. Ortúzar, “Inclusion of latent variables in mixed logit models: modelling and forecasting,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 744–753, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. I. Politis, P. Papaioannou, and S. Basbas, “Integrated choice and latent variable models for evaluating flexible transport mode choice,” Research in Transportation Business & Management, vol. 3, pp. 24–38, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Y. Shiftan, M. L. Outwater, and Y. Zhou, “Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation,” Transport Policy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 186–195, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Deutsch, S. Y. Yoon, and K. Goulias, “Modeling travel behavior and sense of place using a structural equation model,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 28, pp. 155–163, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Nurlaela and C. Curtis, “Modeling household residential location choice and travel behavior and its relationship with public transport accessibility,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 54, pp. 56–64, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. McFadden, “The choice theory approach to market research,” Marketing Science, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 275–297, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M. Ben-Akiva, J. L. Walker, A. T. Bernardino, D. A. Gopinath, T. Morikawa, and A. Polydoropoulou, “Integration of choice and latent variable models,” in Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Challenges, H. S. Mahmassani, Ed., Pergamon, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  35. T. F. Golob, “Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research,” Transportation Research B: Methodological, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. Kim, S. Rasouli, and H. Timmermans, “Expanding scope of hybrid choice models allowing for mixture of social influences and latent attitudes. Application to intended purchase of electric cars,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 69, pp. 71–85, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Bolduc, M. Ben-Akiva, J. Walker, and A. Michaud, “Hybrid choice models with logit kernel: applicability to large scale models,” in Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models: Behavioral Foundations, M. Lee-Gosselin and S. Doherty, Eds., pp. 275–302, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  38. M. Abou-Zeid, M. Ben-Akiva, M. Bierlaire, C. F. Choudhury, and S. Hess, “Attitudes and value of time heterogeneity,” in Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, January 2011.
  39. A. Daly, S. Hess, B. Patruni, D. Potoglou, and C. Rohr, “Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: A study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour,” Transportation, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 267–297, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Kamargianni and A. Polydoropoulou, “Hybrid choice model to investigate effects of teenagers' attitudes toward walking and cycling on mode choice behavior,” Transportation Research Record, no. 2382, pp. 151–161, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. A. Daziano and D. Bolduc, “Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model,” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 74–106, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. R. Bhat and S. K. Dubey, “A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modeling,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 67, pp. 68–85, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. Raveau, M. F. Yáñez, and J. D. D. Ortúzar, “Practical and empirical identifiability of hybrid discrete choice models,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1374–1383, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. Temme, M. Paulssen, and T. Dannewald, “Incorporating latent variables into discrete choice models — a simultaneous estimation approach using SEM software,” Business Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 220–237, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. J. D. Ortúzar and L. G. Willumsen, Modelling Transport, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 3rd edition, 2001.
  46. D. Bolduc and A. Giroux, The Integrated Choice and Latent Variable (ICLV) Model: Handout to Accompany the Estimation Software, Département d’économique, Université Laval, 2005.