Research Article
Mode Choice Model for Public Transport with Categorized Latent Variables
Table 2
Summary of collected data.
| Item | Proportion | Note |
| Gender | Male | 60.1% | | Female | 39.9% | |
| Age | Under 18 | 0.7% | | 19 to 35 | 87.8% | | 36 to 55 | 10.1% | | Over 56 | 1.4% | |
| Occupation | Student | 44.6% | The sum of these three proportions of commenters is 93.9%, which is in line with the fact that commuters for work or school account for 75%. | Staff in government or public institution | 25.0% | Staff in enterprise | 24.3% | Other | 6.1% | |
| Education background | Completion of specialized or general sec. ed. & under | 2.0% | | Technical secondary school, junior college, and university | 52.7% | | Master degree or above | 45.3% | |
| Income/month | Under 1,000 | 32.4% | Nearly half of the respondents are students, so the income is quite low. | 1,000 to 2,000 | 23.0% | 2,000 to 3,000 | 19.6% | | 3,000 to4,000 | 15.5% | | Over 4,000 | 9.5% | |
| Vehicle ownership | Car | 21.6% | | Bicycle | 27.0% | | Electric bicycle | 8.2% | | Other vehicle | 43.2% | |
| Trips/day | 0 to 1 time | 28.4% | | 2 to 4 times | 65.5% | | Over 5 times | 6.1% | |
| Trip purpose | Work or school | 75.0% | | Shopping | 15.5% | | Recreation | 4.7% | | Other | 4.7% | |
|
|