Research Article
A Hybrid Approach for Evaluating Faulty Behavior Risk of High-Risk Operations Using ANP and Evidence Theory
Table 8
Index score results of the three experts.
| Evaluation index | The first investigator | The second investigator | The third investigator | Inconformity number | Total number | Inconformity rate | Scores | Inconformity number | Total number | Inconformity rate | Scores | Inconformity number | Total number | Inconformity rate | Scores |
| A1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| A2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| A3 | 1 | 13 | 8% | 2: 20% | 1 | 13 | 8% | 2: 20% | 2 | 13 | 15% | 3: 50% | 3: 80% | 3: 80% | 4: 50% |
| B1 | 4 | 19 | 21% | 4: 90% | 4 | 19 | 21% | 4: 90% | 3 | 19 | 16% | 3: 40% | 5: 10% | 5: 10% | 4: 60% |
| B2 | 3 | 27 | 11% | 3: 90% | 3 | 27 | 11% | 3: 90% | 2 | 27 | 7% | 2: 30% | 4: 10% | 4: 10% | 3: 70% |
| B3 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 11% | 3: 90% | 1 | 9 | 11% | 3: 90% | 4: 10% | 4: 10% |
| B4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| B5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| C1 | 4 | 27 | 15% | 3: 50% | 2 | 27 | 7% | 2: 30% | 2 | 27 | 7% | 2: 30% | 4: 50% | 3: 70% | 3: 70% |
| C2 | 1 | 18 | 6% | 2: 40% | 0 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 6% | 2: 40% | 3: 60% | 3: 60% |
| C3 | 1 | 12 | 8% | 2: 20% | 1 | 12 | 8% | 2: 20% | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 3: 80% | 3: 80% |
| C4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50% | 7: 01 | 8: 00 |
| C5 | 1 | 3 | 33% | 5: 70% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6: 30% |
| C6 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 11% | 3: 90% | 4: 10% |
| C7 | 1 | 12 | 8% | 2: 20% | 1 | 12 | 8% | 2: 20% | 2 | 12 | 17% | 3: 30% | 3: 80% | 3: 80% | 4: 70% |
| D1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 25 | 4: 50% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5: 50% |
| D2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| D3 | 1 | 5 | 20% | 4: 1 | 1 | 5 | 20% | 4: 1 | 2 | 5 | 40% | 6: 1 | 5: 0 | 5: 0 | 7: 0 |
|
|