Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 7954784, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7954784
Research Article

A New Dynamic Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach for Green Supplier Selection in Construction Projects under Time Sequence

School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150001, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Baizhou Li; nc.ude.uebrh@hcdaca

Received 20 October 2017; Accepted 5 December 2017; Published 26 December 2017

Academic Editor: Konstantinos Karamanos

Copyright © 2017 Shi Yin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Yudelson, Green Building A to Z: Understanding the Language of Green Building, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, 2007.
  2. Change I P O C, Climate change 2014 synthesis report, Environmental Policy Collection, 2014.
  3. B. Kang, Y. Hu, Y. Deng, and D. Zhou, “A new methodology of multicriteria decision-making in supplier selection based on z-numbers,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 8475987, 17 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. H. I. Lee, H. Kang, C. F. Hsu, and H. Hung, “A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 7917–7927, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C.-W. Hsu, T.-C. Kuo, S.-H. Chen, and A. H. Hu, “Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 56, pp. 164–172, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Kannan and C. J. C. Jabbour, “Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 233, no. 2, pp. 432–447, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. C.-W. Tsui and U.-P. Wen, “A hybrid multiple criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier selection in the TFT-LCD industry,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 709872, 13 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. O. Gurel, A. Z. Acar, I. Onden, and I. Gumus, “Determinants of the green supplier selection,” Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 181, pp. 131–139, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. H. M. W. Chen, S.-Y. Chou, Q. D. Luu, and T. H.-K. Yu, “A fuzzy MCDM approach for green supplier selection from the economic and environmental aspects,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 8097386, 10 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Yu, Y. Yang, and D. Chang, “Carbon footprint based green supplier selection under dynamic environment,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 170, pp. 880–889, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Govindan and R. Sivakumar, “Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 238, no. 1-2, pp. 243–276, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. Q. Pang, T. Yang, M. Li, and Y. Shen, “A fuzzy-grey multicriteria decision making approach for green supplier selection in low-carbon supply chain,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 9653261, 9 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. X. Zhang, L. Shen, and Y. Wu, “Green strategy for gaining competitive advantage in housing development: a China study,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 19, no. 2-3, pp. 157–167, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Mokhlesian, “How do contractors select suppliers for greener construction projects? The case of three Swedish companies,” Sustainability, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 4133–4151, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. I. Ruuska, T. Ahola, M. Martinsuo, and T. Westerholm, “Supplier capabilities in large shipbuilding projects,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 542–553, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Woo, M. G. Kim, Y. Chung, and J. J. Rho, “Suppliers' communication capability and external green integration for green and financial performance in Korean construction industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 112, pp. 483–493, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. G. Kim, C. Woo, J. J. Rho, and Y. Chung, “Environmental capabilities of suppliers for green supply chain management in construction projects: A Case Study in Korea,” Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. P. Chan, A. Darko, and E. E. Ameyaw, “Strategies for promoting green building technologies adoption in the construction industry—An international study,” Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 969, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. K. Govindan, R. Khodaverdi, and A. Jafarian, “A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 47, pp. 345–354, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. P. Saradhi, N. R. Shankar, and C. Suryanarayana, “Novel Distance Measure in Fuzzy TOPSIS for Supply Chain Strategy Based Supplier Selection,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 7183407, 17 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Darabi and J. Heydari, “An interval- valued hesitant fuzzy ranking method based on group decision analysis for green supplier selection,” IFAC-Papers OnLine, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 12–17, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W.-C. Yeh and M.-C. Chuang, “Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 4244–4253, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Kumar, V. Jain, S. Kumar, and C. Chandra, “Green supplier selection: a new genetic/immune strategy with industrial application,” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 911–943, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Gupta, “Supplier selection using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm,” International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 457–472, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. Punniyamoorthy, P. Mathiyalagan, and P. Parthiban, “A strategic model using structural equation modeling and fuzzy logic in supplier selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 458–474, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Fallahpour, E. U. Olugu, S. N. Musa, D. Khezrimotlagh, and K. Y. Wong, “An integrated model for green supplier selection under fuzzy environment: application of data envelopment analysis and genetic programming approach,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 707–725, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L.-H. Li, J.-C. Hang, Y. Gao, and C.-Y. Mu, “Using an Integrated Group Decision Method Based on SVM, TFN-RS-AHP, and TOPSIS-CD for Cloud Service Supplier Selection,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 3143502, 14 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Amid, S. H. Ghodsypour, and C. O'Brien, “A weighted max-min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection in a supply chain,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 139–145, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Z. Hu, C. Rao, Y. Zheng, and D. Huang, “Optimization decision of supplier selection in green procurement under the mode of low carbon economy,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 407–421, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Tavana, A. Fallahpour, D. Di Caprio, and F. J. Santos-Arteaga, “A hybrid intelligent fuzzy predictive model with simulation for supplier evaluation and selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 129–144, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Qin, X. Liu, and W. Pedrycz, “An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 258, no. 4, pp. 626–638, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. P. Ghadimi, A. Dargi, and C. Heavey, “Sustainable supplier performance scoring using audition check-list based fuzzy inference system: a case application in automotive spare part industry,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 105, pp. 12–27, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Z. Xu, “Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 11, pp. 2363–2379, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  34. A. Čižmešija, “A new sharp double inequality for generalized Heronian, harmonic and power means,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 664–671, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  35. P. Liu, Z. Liu, and X. Zhang, “Some intuitionistic uncertain linguistic Heronian mean operators and their application to group decision making,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 230, pp. 570–586, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  36. Z.-P. Tian, J. Wang, J.-Q. Wang, and H.-Y. Zhang, “A likelihood-based qualitative flexible approach with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information,” Cognitive Computation, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 670–683, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Z. S. Xu, “On multi-period multi-attribute decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 164–171, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. Z. S. Xu and J. Chen, “Binomial distribution based approach to deriving time series weights,” in Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM 2007, pp. 154–158, Singapore, December 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, “Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decison making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 246–262, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  40. R. Sadiq and S. Tesfamariam, “Probability density functions based weights for ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators: an example of water quality indices,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 1350–1368, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Z.-L. Yang and L.-C. Huang, “Dynamic stochastic multiattribute decision-making that considers stochastic variable variance characteristics under time-sequence contingency environments,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 7126856, 9 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. Sarkis, Q. Zhu, and K.-H. Lai, “An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. K. Atanassov and G. Gargov, “Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 343–349, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. Z.-S. Xu, “Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making,” Control and Decision, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 215–219, 2007 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. V. L. G. Nayagam, S. Muralikrishnan, and G. Sivaraman, “Multi-criteria decision-making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1464–1467, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. R. R. Yager, “OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1952–1963, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. H. Zhao, J.-X. You, and H.-C. Liu, “Failure mode and effect analysis using MULTIMOORA method with continuous weighted entropy under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Soft Computing, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. D. J. Yu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric Heronian mean aggregation operators,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1235–1246, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, “Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 417–433, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus