Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 8701081, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8701081
Research Article

Railway Container Station Reselection Approach and Application: Based on Entropy-Cloud Model

School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Wencheng Huang

Received 7 June 2016; Revised 14 November 2016; Accepted 16 November 2016; Published 5 January 2017

Academic Editor: Peide Liu

Copyright © 2017 Wencheng Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Wang, “Development countermeasures research of railway container transportation,” Railway Freight, vol. 1, pp. 51–53, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. Ballis, “Airport site selection based on multi-criteria analysis: the case study of the island of samothraki,” Operational Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 261–279, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. S. Önüt and S. Soner, “Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment,” Waste Management, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1552–1559, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. L. Rosenberg and A.-M. Esnard, “Applying a hybrid scoring methodology to transit site selection,” Journal of Urban Planning and Development, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 180–186, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Dağdeviren, S. Yavuz, and N. Kılınç, “Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 8143–8151, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Kauko, “What makes a location attractive for the housing consumer? Preliminary findings from metropolitan Helsinki and Randstad Holland using the analytical hierarchy process,” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 159–176, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Kauko, “An analysis of housing location attributes in the inner city of Budapest, Hungary, using expert judgements,” International Journal of Strategic Property Management, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 209–225, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Z. Srdjevic, V. Kolarov, and B. Srdjevic, “Finding the best location for pumping stations in the Galovica drainage area of Serbia: the AHP approach for sustainable development,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 502–511, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. K. Dey and E. K. Ramcharan, “Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1384–1395, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. B. Liu, P. Berger, A. Zeng, and A. Gerstenfeld, “Applying the analytic hierarchy process to the offshore outsourcing location decision,” Supply Chain Management, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 435–449, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. L. García, A. Alvarado, J. Blanco, E. Jiménez, A. A. Maldonado, and G. Cortés, “Multi-attribute evaluation and selection of sites for agricultural product warehouses based on an analytic hierarchy process,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 100, pp. 60–69, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. V. Padmaja, S. S. Asadi, and M. A. Reddy, “Integrated analytical hierarchy process—GIS model for landfill siting: a case study from India,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management, pp. 155–166, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2007.
  13. P. K. Dey, “An integrated assessment model for cross-country pipelines,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 703–721, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Timor and S. Sipahi, “Fast-food restaurant site selection factor evaluation by the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” The Business Review, Cambridge, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 161–167, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Korpela, A. Lehmusvaara, and J. Nisonen, “Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 108, no. 1-2, pp. 135–142, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Akinci, A. Y. Özalp, and B. Turgut, “Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 97, pp. 71–82, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. A. Carrión, A. E. Estrella, F. A. Dols, M. Z. Toro, M. Rodríguez, and A. R. Ridao, “Environmental decision-support systems for evaluating the carrying capacity of land areas: Optimal site selection for grid-connected photovoltaic power plants,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2358–2380, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. D. Kontos, D. P. Komilis, and C. P. Halvadakis, “Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology,” Waste Management, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 818–832, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. W. L. Cheng, H. Li, and L. Yu, “The analytic network process (ANP) approach to location selection: a shopping mall illustration,” Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 83–97, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Banar, B. M. Kose, A. Ozkan, and I. P. Acar, “Choosing a municipal landfill site by analytic network process,” Environmental Geology, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 747–751, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Aragonés-Beltrán, J. P. Pastor-Ferrando, F. García-García, and A. Pascual-Agulló, “An Analytic Network Process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain),” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1071–1086, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Ekmekçioĝlu, T. Kaya, and C. Kahraman, “Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste,” Waste Management, vol. 30, no. 8-9, pp. 1729–1736, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Önüt, T. Efendigil, and S. S. Kara, “A combined fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting shopping center site: an example from Istanbul, Turkey,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1973–1980, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. J. Hoffman and M. J. Schniederjans, “A two-stage model for structuring global facility site selection decisions: the case of the brewing industry,” International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 14, no. 12-13, pp. 23–34, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Brimberg and C. ReVelle, “A multi-facility location model with partial satisfaction of demand,” Studies in Locational Analysis, no. 13, pp. 91–101, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. G. Schmidt and W. E. Wilhelm, “Strategic, tactical and operational decisions in multi-national logistics networks: a review and discussion of modelling issues,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1501–1523, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Rönnqvist, S. Tragantalerngsak, and J. Holt, “Repeated matching heuristic for the single-source capacitated facility location problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 51–68, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  28. G.-S. Liang and M.-J. J. Wang, “Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for facility site selection,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 2313–2330, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  29. T. Semih and S. Seyhan, “A multi-criteria factor evaluation model for gas station site selection,” Journal of Global Management, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  30. F. Felice, A. Petrillo, and O. Cooper, “Multicriteria analysis to evaluate influence of green practices on supply chain performance,” Science Journal of Business Management, vol. 2012, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  31. I. Mahamid and S. Thawaba, “Multi-criteria and landfill site selection using GIS: a case study from Palestine,” The Open Environmental Engineering Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. A. Mendas and A. Delali, “Integration of MultiCriteria Decision Analysis in GIS to develop land suitability for agriculture: application to durum wheat cultivation in the region of Mleta in Algeria,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 83, pp. 117–126, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Uyan, T. Cay, and O. Akcakaya, “A spatial decision support system design for land reallocation: a case study in Turkey,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 98, pp. 8–16, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. Y. Li, H. J. Meng, and X. M. Shi, “Membership clouds and membership cloud generators,” Journal of Computer Research and Development, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 15–20, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  35. L. Li, L. Liu, C. Yang, and Z. Li, “The comprehensive evaluation of smart distribution grid based on cloud model,” Energy Procedia, vol. 17, pp. 96–102, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. L. J. Fan, Y. X. Ling, L. C. Liao, and B. X. Li, “An improved evaluation method based on cloud models for situation consistency within the battlefield of joint operations,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 29, pp. 1590–1595, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. L. Zhang, X. Wu, L. Ding, and M. J. Skibniewski, “A novel model for risk assessment of adjacent buildings in tunneling environments,” Building and Environment, vol. 65, pp. 185–194, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C.-B. Li, Z.-Q. Qi, and X. Feng, “A multi-risks group evaluation method for the informatization project under linguistic environment,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1581–1592, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. L. Zhang, X. Wu, Q. Chen, M. J. Skibniewski, and J. Zhong, “Developing a cloud model based risk assessment methodology for tunnel-induced damage to existing pipelines,” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 513–526, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Y. F. Ma and J. P. Xu, “A cloud theory-based particle swarm optimization for multiple decision maker vehicle routing problems with fuzzy random time windows,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 825–842, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  41. L. Wu, C. Zuo, and H. Zhang, “A cloud model based fruit fly optimization algorithm,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 89, pp. 603–617, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. W. H. Deng, G. Y. Wang, and X. R. Zhang, “A novel hybrid water quality time series prediction method based on cloud model and fuzzy forecasting,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 149, pp. 39–49, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. X.-H. Wu, J.-Q. Wang, J.-J. Peng, and X.-H. Chen, “Cross-entropy and prioritized aggregation operator with simplified neutrosophic sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making problems,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1104–1116, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  44. J. Wang, J. Wang, and H. Zhang, “A likelihood-based TODIM approach based on multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic information for evaluation in logistics outsourcing,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 99, pp. 287–299, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. H. Zhang, P. Ji, J. Wang, and X. Chen, “A neutrosophic normal cloud and its application in decision-making,” Cognitive Computation, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 649–669, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. H. Zhang, R. Zhou, J. Wang, and X. Chen, “An FMCDM approach to purchasing decision-making based on cloud model and prospect theory in e-commerce,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 676–688, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. P. Liu and L. Shi, “The generalized hybrid weighted average operator based on interval neutrosophic hesitant set and its application to multiple attribute decision making,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 457–471, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. Liu, L. He, and X. Yu, “Generalized hybrid aggregation operators based on the 2-dimension uncertain linguistic information for multiple attribute group decision making,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 103–126, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J.-Q. Wang, L. Peng, H.-Y. Zhang, and X.-H. Chen, “Method of multi-criteria group decision-making based on cloud aggregation operators with linguistic information,” Information Sciences, vol. 274, pp. 177–191, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  50. J.-Q. Wang, J.-J. Peng, H.-Y. Zhang, T. Liu, and X.-H. Chen, “An uncertain linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making method based on a cloud model,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 171–192, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. G. Wang, C. Xu, and D. Li, “Generic normal cloud model,” Information Sciences. An International Journal, vol. 280, pp. 1–15, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  52. Y. Wu, K. Chen, B. Zeng, M. Yang, and S. Geng, “Cloud-based decision framework for waste-to-energy plant site selection—a case study from China,” Waste Management, vol. 48, pp. 593–603, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. L. Li, F. Fan, L. Ma, and Z. Tang, “Energy utilization evaluation of carbon performance in public projects by FAHP and cloud model,” Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 7, article 630, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar