A Correction Method for UAV Helicopter Airborne Temperature and Humidity Sensor

Fan, Longqing; Chen, Ge; Yu, Fangjie; Liu, Yunfei; Li, Linhua

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9289061

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Conclusion Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 | Article ID 9289061 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9289061

A Correction Method for UAV Helicopter Airborne Temperature and Humidity Sensor

Longqing Fan,¹Ge Chen,^1,2Fangjie Yu ,^1,2Yunfei Liu,¹and Linhua Li¹

Academic Editor: Daniela Boso

Received01 Jan 2017

Accepted11 Apr 2017

Published07 May 2017

Abstract

This paper presents a correction method for UAV helicopter airborne temperature and humidity including an error correction scheme and a bias-calibration scheme. As rotor downwash flow brings measurement error on helicopter airborne sensors inevitably, the error correction scheme constructs a model between the rotor induced velocity and temperature and humidity by building the heat balance equation for platinum resistor temperature sensor and the pressure correction term for humidity sensor. The induced velocity of a spatial point below the rotor disc plane can be calculated by the sum of the induced velocities excited by center line vortex, rotor disk vortex, and skew cylinder vortex based on the generalized vortex theory. In order to minimize the systematic biases, the bias-calibration scheme adopts a multiple linear regression to achieve a systematically consistent result with the tethered balloon profiles. Two temperature and humidity sensors were mounted on “Z-5” UAV helicopter in the field experiment. Overall, the result of applying the calibration method shows that the temperature and relative humidity obtained by UAV helicopter closely align with tethered balloon profiles in providing measurements of the temperature profiles and humidity profiles within marine atmospheric boundary layers.

1. Introduction

The temperature and relative humidity profiles of marine atmospheric boundary layer are essential parameters to depict ocean atmospheric thermodynamics and dynamics. Vigorous exchange of heat between the ocean and atmosphere across specific ocean front has an obvious influence on air-sea interaction, such as the Brazil Current [1], Agulhas Return Current [2], and Kuroshio and its extension [3]. The distribution of water vapor in the atmosphere affects climate change through radiative balance and surface evaporation [4]. Therefore, continuous observations of temperature and humidity profile are very precious and valuable.

Satellite atmospheric sounding is a widely used way to acquire the atmospheric temperature and relative humidity profiles. King [5] was the first to propose the idea to utilize satellite detecting the thermal infrared radiation to get the atmospheric temperature profiles. Kaplan [6] retrieved the temperature profiles on the basis of the distribution of atmospheric emission spectrum. In 1969, Nimbus satellite carried the first atmospheric sounding instrument SIRS-A [7]. After that, a mountain of retrieval works about the temperature and humidity profile were carried out [8–11]. However, the vertical resolution of the temperature and humidity profiles retrieved form satellite data is more than 1 km [12, 13] so that the satellite profiles are not able to capture local and subtle structure which is crucial for high precision numerical prediction. Several researches have been implemented to obtain these high precision profiles, such as shipboard atmospheric soundings [14–17] and airborne measurements [18–20]. But, airborne and shipborne measurements cost much, and they cannot reach the specific zone where the oceanographic phenomena are both difficult to be seized and of great importance.

Recently, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been widely used in atmospheric research, which is attributed to low cost relatively, nice maneuverability, and the ability to obtain high spatiotemporal resolution data. In 2007, the Scripps Research Institute used the shipborne UAV for the first time in marine research task. Pereira et al. [21] fostered six different types of UAVs for coastal and environmental research and demonstrated the effectiveness of UAV system in the coastal environment monitoring. Whereafter, Knuth et al. [22, 23] measured the temperature, humidity, and pressure regarding the atmospheric structure of Terra Nova Bay during the UAV flights at high vertical and temporal resolutions to confirm the results derived from AWS (automatic weather station) and satellite data. Furthermore, Wainwright et al. [24] adopted “SMARTSonde” UAV equipped with temperature, pressure, and relative humidity sensors to describe the small-scale temperature perturbations elaborately. UAV platforms have also been proven to be an effective means of observing the temperature and humidity profiles.

UAV helicopter holds an advantage over fixed-wing UAV in terms of flexibility, takeoff, and landing conditions. Quite to the contrary, the majority of UAVs are fixed-wing in the application of atmospheric and marine observations, only a small number of UAV helicopters. One reason for this situation is that rotor downwash flow must give rise to a measuring error on airborne sensors, especially for gas sensors, temperature, and humidity sensors. Currently researches on rotor downwash flow mainly concentrate on the analyses of aerodynamic characteristic [25, 26]. The works related to removing the influence on temperature and humidity sensors are relatively lacking. Holder et al. [27] adopted the empirical mode decomposition method to process the helicopter observation platform data including temperature, water vapor concentration, and carbon dioxide concentration based on signal spectrum information, while there is no numerical calculation model suitable for helicopter airborne temperature and humidity sensors in literature.

In this study, we proposed a correction method for temperature and humidity profiles obtained by UVA helicopter. The structure of this paper is as follows. In the next section, the correction method is formulated in detail. In Section 3, a brief description of UAV specifications is given and the experiment is described. Then simulation results are demonstrated to assess the validity of the proposed method in Section 4. Finally, some conclusions are drawn in Section 5.

2. Calibration Method

The calibration method is composed of two components in this study, including the error correction scheme which is introduced by downwash flow and the bias-calibration scheme. The error correction scheme is based on the vortex theory and empirical formula between wind speed and temperature and relative humidity, respectively, to eliminate the influence of downwash flow. Details on the error correction are described below.

2.1. Error Correction Scheme

According to Biot-Savart Law, the induced velocity of a specific point by a microsegment in vortex line can be acquired by circulation. Suppose that the circulation of a vortex line is ; the induced velocity can be expressed as So, the axial component of is given bywhere is a microsegment in vortex line and vector is the distance between and the specific point.

The wing vortices are equal to a skew screw vortex cylinder which treats the rotor disc plane as its base and extends to infinity in the direction of the synthetic flow when UAV helicopter flies forward. Based on the generalized vortex theory, the skew screw vortex cylinder can be divided into three parts: center line vortex, rotor disk vortex, and skew cylinder vortex as shown in Figure 1. is a casual point below the rotor disc plane in cylindrical coordinate system and the induced velocity of point can be calculated by the sum of above three parts.

The direction of center line vortex is from down to up along the axis of skew screw vortex cylinder. The geometric relationship is shown in Figure 2. and are the projection of and in the rotor disc plane, respectively, and the angle between the center line vortex and -axis is . Those parameters have the following forms:

According to formula (2), the axial component of induced velocity by center line vortex can be written as

Geometric model of induced velocity by rotor disk vortex is shown in Figure 3. and are the projection of and in the rotor disc plane, respectively. The radius of rotor disc plane is . The angle between the vortex line and the -axis is and indicates the angle between and -axis. The quantity represents the distance from the microsegment in vortex line to the center of rotor disc plane. According to the geometric relationship, those parameters have the following forms:

(a)

(b)

Assume that the UAV helicopter has -blade rotor and the circulation of each blade is ; the circulation of a bound vortex corresponding to is . By combining formulas (2) and (5), the axial component of induced velocity by rotor disk vortex can be derived asEquation (6) can be rearranged in dimensionless forms as follows:

In order to simplify the difficulty in computation for an analytic solution, the circulation and the induced velocity are decomposed into first-order Fourier serieswhereConsequently, the axial component of induced velocity by rotor disk vortex can be written aswhere , , and are the first, second, and third kind of complete elliptic integral, respectively, [28, 29], in which and .

The skew cylinder vortex can be divided into toroidal vortex column and straight-line cylindrical vortex column; geometric model of induced velocity by skew cylinder vortex is shown in Figure 4. , , and are the projection of , , and in the rotor disc plane, respectively. The radius of rotor disc plane is . The angle between the line - and the -axis is and indicates the angle between -axis and the extension line of . For the toroidal vortex column, those parameters have the following forms:

For the straight-line cylindrical vortex column, those parameters have the following forms:

Owing to the circulation and the induced velocity appearing periodic variation along the azimuth, the circulation and the induced velocity can be decomposed into first-order Fourier series as well. Similar to formula (11), the components of the induced velocity in first-order Fourier series are calculated as follows: where , , and are the first, second, and third kind of complete elliptic integral, respectively, in which and .

So the axial component of induced velocity by skew cylinder vortex can be expressed as

According to Kutta-Joukowski theorem [30], the circulation is a function of the induced velocity, which leads to the uncertainty of circulation. It is difficult to get an analytical expression about the induced velocity without any simplification; therefore the method which separates infinite skew cylinders into finite skew cylinders is adopted as shown in Figure 5.

(a)

(b)

Based on this method, the induced velocity in spatial point can be represented as the summation of the finite skew cylinders. The relationship between the bound vortex and cylindrical vortex circulation is given by

Refer to the flapping motion equation combined with blade-element theory and Kutta-Joukowski equation; the components of the bound vortex in first-order Fourier series can be expressed aswhere is the lift-curve slope, is the chord length of rotor blade, is the advance ratio, , , , and indicate the variable-pitch parameters, and , , and indicate the flapping motion coefficients.

By combining (16) and (17), we can get a system of linear equations with , , and as independent variables. A matrix equation group is put forward with proper transform for the purpose of solving the above linear equations; that is,where .

According to the given initial parameters , , , , and and from (18), the induced velocity of a casual point below the rotor disc plane can be calculated by

In order to adapt to high-altitude or marine environment, the UAV helicopter usually has a big rotor. So the influence of downwash flow on temperature sensor mainly shows the convective heat-exchange. For platinum resistor temperature sensor, the heat balance equation is established as follows when the convective heat-exchange gets stable:where is the convection area, is the true value, is the measured value, is the voltage of temperature sensor, is the measured resistance, and is the convective heat-exchange coefficient. According to Nusselt number, the convective heat-exchange coefficient can be expressed aswhere is the velocity of downwash flow, is the average kinematic viscosity, and is the average heat conductivity coefficient.

As a consequence, the temperature without downwash flow can be estimated by

The relative humidity is associated with temperature and pressure. Once temperature changes, the relative will change accordingly. In addition, the rotor downwash flow will introduce extra wind pressure . On the basis of the definition of relative humidity , the relative humidity with pressure correction term can be estimated bywhere and are the saturation water vapor pressure corresponding to and , respectively. is the measured relative humidity and is the pressure corresponding to the height. The saturation water vapor pressure can be obtained by the Goff-Gratch equation.

2.2. Bias-Calibration Scheme

The purpose of the bias-calibration scheme is to make the outputs form the error correction scheme consistent with tethered balloon profiles in terms of minimized biases. Numerous factors may lead to the systematic biases. The error correction scheme may have calculation biases, and the interaction between fuselage and rotor may bring in extra biases. In this section, a multiple linear regression is established to achieve a systematically consistent result with the tethered balloon profiles.

As to the temperature data, we define the error as where is output form the correction scheme and is tethered balloon data; then we regress to figure out , , and such thatwhere is the latitude of the UAV helicopter. Finally the temperature data can be calibrated as

An analogous equation is derived for relative humidity; that is,

In conclusion, the whole procedure can be executed as follows.

Step 1. Initialize the blade parameters and working condition; by solving the matrix equation (18), we can calculate each order of harmonic of the discrete vortices.

Step 2. According to and (10) and (13), we can derive each order of harmonic of the induced velocities excited by the center line vortex, rotor disk vortex, and skew cylinder vortex;

Step 3. By (19), the induced velocity of a casual point below the rotor disc plane can be computed; if the airflow velocity is not convergent in this situation, go back to Step 1.

Step 4. The temperature and relative humidity without the influence of rotor downwash flow came out based on (22) and (24).

Step 5. Construct multiple linear regression data sets; (27) and (28) output the final temperature and relative humidity processed by the proposed calibration method.

3. UAV Parameters and Experiments

For the purpose of assessing the effectiveness of the proposed method, we use the data gathered by “Z-5” UAV helicopter with the temperature and humidity sensor as shown in Figure 6. The UAV helicopter owns a single rotor and the type of its blade is rectangular. The parameters are as follows: the rotor radius is 3.13 m, the chord length is 0.18 m, the number of blades is 2, the rotor solidity is 0.04, the lift-curve slope is 5.6, the tip speed of the blade is 183.9 m/s, and the cruising speed is 25 m/s. Two temperature and humidity sensors were mounted on “Z-5” UAV helicopter, one on each side of the helicopter. The coordinates of the sensors in cylindrical coordinate system are .

Tethered balloon with temperature and humidity sensor is one of the most efficient direct observations. Therefore, the data in this way could be regarded as criterion to calibrate the UAV helicopter data. The tethered balloon was released along with helicopter near the coast of Hailing Island to guarantee the data homogeneous in time and space. In order to avoid data pollution by helicopter, the balloon was upwind of the helicopter. At the same time, the balloon was tied with two ropes, one for height and the other for horizontal distance, to prevent a collision. Two sorties were carried out on November 12, 2016, and November 19, 2016, respectively.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Error Correction Scheme Performance

The data sets used in comparison were from 0 to 400 m which was because the tethered balloon just reached 400 m, limited by its capacity and the local wind. The temperature and relative humidity obtained by helicopter after error correction scheme have a good consistency with tethered balloon profiles in general as shown in Figures 7 and 8.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(a)

(b)

(c)

The reflection of ground on rotor downwash flow and the surrounding contribute to complex airflow environment, so the deviation is obvious for both temperature and relative humidity at low altitude in accordance with Figures 7(a), 7(b), 8(a), and 8(b). The mean bias errors (hereafter MBEs) are defined as tethered balloon profiles minus UAV helicopter data. The MBEs for temperature are a standard normal distribution as shown in Figure 7(c) and the MBEs for relative humidity obey a normal distribution with a mean of 2.5% RH as shown in Figure 8(c). Therefore, the systematic random error is the dominant factor in affecting the output results. For temperature, the MBEs are within ±0.5°C at high altitude. For relative humidity, the MBEs can reach 5.5% RH due to the existence of static bias of 2.5% RH.

4.2. Bias-Calibration Scheme Performance

The error correction scheme is able to effectively eliminate the impact of rotor downwash flow on the temperature and humidity sensor. However, numerous factors may lead to the systematic biases such as model biases, calculation biases, and random biases. Figures 7(c) and 8(c) show that the measurement accuracy needs to improve, relative to the accuracy of the temperature and humidity sensor. The bias-calibration scheme employing a multiple linear regression makes a better consistency between the helicopter data and tethered balloon profiles as shown in Figures 9 and 10.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(a)

(b)

(c)

The bias-calibration scheme is also effective at low altitude. The profiles obtained by helicopter on November 19 are very close to the tethered balloon profile as shown in Figures 9(b) and 10(b). In addition, the bias-calibration scheme can remove the static biases of relative humidity as shown in Figure 10(c) which makes the MBEs a standard normal distribution. As a consequence, the MBEs are mostly within ±0.2°C for temperature and the MBEs are mostly less than ±2% RH after applying the correction method.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, a correction method for UAV-borne temperature and humidity sensor based on the vortex theory and multiple linear regression to eliminate the influence of rotor downwash flow is described. By dividing the skew screw vortex cylinder into center line vortex, rotor disk vortex, and skew cylinder vortex, the induced velocity of a spatial point is calculated. Then, the relationship between the induced velocity and temperature and relative humidity is derived from a heat balance equation. Moreover, a multiple linear regression is applied to minimize the systematic biases. To evaluate the calibration method, the temperature and humidity sensors were deployed on UAV helicopter and tethered balloon to gather the data at the same time. As a result, the temperature and relative humidity obtained by helicopter can achieve better consistency of tethered balloon profiles. On this basis, UAV helicopter can cooperate with satellite to capture the high precision temperature profiles and humidity profiles within marine and atmospheric boundary layers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the NSFC-Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research Centers (Grant no. U1606405) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant no. SS2014AA092105).

References

W. B. White and J. L. Annis, “Coupling of extratropical mesoscale eddies in the ocean to westerly winds in the atmospheric boundary layer,” Journal of Physical Oceanography, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1095–1107, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. W. O'Neill, D. B. Chelton, S. K. Esbensen, and F. J. Wentz, “High-resolution satellite measurements of the atmospheric boundary layer response to SST variations along the Agulhas Return Current,” Journal of Climate, vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 2706–2723, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kubota, N. Iwabe, M. F. Cronin, and H. Tomita, “Surface heat fluxes from the NCEP/NCAR and NCEP/DOE reanalyses at the Kuroshio Extension Observatory buoy site,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, vol. 113, no. 2, Article ID C02009, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. T. Liu, W. Q. Tang, and P. P. Niiler, “humidity profiles over the ocean,” Journal of Climate, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1023–1034, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
J. I. F. King, The Radiative Heat Transfer of Planet Earth, 1958.
L. D. Kaplan, “inference of atmospheric structure from remote radiation measurements,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1004–1006, 1959.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Q. Wark, D. T. Hilleary, S. P. Anderson, and J. C. Fischer, “nimbus satellite infrared spectrometer experiment,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 264–270, 1970.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. L. Smith, H. M. Woolf, and H. E. Revercomb, “Linear simultaneous solution for temperature and absorbing constituent profiles from radiance spectra,” Applied Optics, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1117–1123, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Marécal and J.-F. Mahfouf, “Variational retrieval of temperature and humidity profiles from TRMM precipitation data,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 128, no. 11, pp. 3853–3866, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Shi, J. L. Matthews, S.-P. Ho, Q. Yang, and J. J. Bates, “Algorithm development of temperature and humidity profile retrievals for long-term HIRS observations,” Remote Sensing, vol. 8, no. 4, article 280, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Krishnamoorthy, D. Kumar, and C. Balaji, “Retrieval of humidity and temperature profiles over the oceans from INSAT 3D satellite radiances,” Journal of Earth System Science, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 217–230, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Fetzer, L. M. McMillin, D. Tobin et al., “AIRS/AMSU/HSB validation,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 418–431, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. H. Aumann, M. T. Chahine, C. Gautier et al., “AIRS/AMSU/HSB on the aqua mission: design, science objectives, data products, and processing systems,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 253–264, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. P. Pezzi, R. B. Souza, M. S. Dourado, C. A. E. Garcia, M. M. Mata, and M. A. F. Silva-Dias, “Ocean-atmosphere in situ observations at the Brazil-Malvinas Confluence region,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 32, no. 22, Article ID L22603, pp. 1–4, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tanimoto, S.-P. Xie, K. Kai et al., “Observations of marine atmospheric boundary layer transitions across the summer Kuroshio extension,” Journal of Climate, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1360–1374, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tokinaga, Y. Tanimoto, M. Nonaka et al., “Atmospheric sounding over the winter Kuroshio Extension: effect of surface stability on atmospheric boundary layer structure,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 33, no. 4, Article ID L04703, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tokinaga, Y. Tanimoto, S.-P. Xie, T. Sampe, H. Tomita, and H. Ichikawa, “Ocean frontal effects on the vertical development of clouds over the western North Pacific: in situ and satellite observations,” Journal of Climate, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 4241–4260, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Flamant, J. Pelon, L. Eymard, and J. Tournadre, “SSM/I integrated water vapor content measurements in coastal regions: a comparison with shipborne and airborne remote sensing measurements, radiosonde measurements, and NWP model retrievals,” Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans, vol. 108, no. 3, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
M. S. Pekour, B. Schmid, D. Chand et al., “Development of a new airborne humidigraph system,” Aerosol Science and Technology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 201–207, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tanimoto, K. Shimoyama, and S. Mori, “Continuous daily observation of the marine atmospheric boundary layer over the kuroshio by a helicopter shuttle service,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3–21, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Pereira, R. Bencatel, J. Correia et al., “Unmanned air vehicles for coastal and environmental research,” Journal of Coastal Research, no. 56, pp. 1557–1561, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
S. L. Knuth and J. J. Cassano, “An analysis of near-surface winds, air temperature, and cyclone activity in Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica, from 1993 to 2009,” Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 662–680, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Knuth, J. J. Cassano, J. A. Maslanik et al., “Unmanned aircraft system measurements of the atmospheric boundary layer over Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica,” Earth System Science Data, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Wainwright, T. A. Bonin, P. B. Chilson, J. A. Gibbs, E. Fedorovich, and R. D. Palmer, “methods for evaluating the temperature structure-function parameter using unmanned aerial systems and large-eddy simulation,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 189–208, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Hwang, M. K. Jung, and O. J. Kwon, “Numerical study of aerodynamic performance of a multirotor unmanned-aerial-vehicle configuration,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 839–846, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Minervino, P. L. Vitagliano, and D. Quagliarella, “Helicopter stabilizer optimization considering rotor downwash in forward-flight,” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 846–865, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. E. Holder, M. A. Bolch, and R. Avissar, “Processing turbulence data collected on board the helicopter observation platform (HOP) with the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 671–683, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Cody, “Chebyshev approximations for the complete elliptic integrals,” Mathematics of Computation, vol. 19, no. 89, pp. 105–112, 1965.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
P. F. Byrd and M. D. Friedman, Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Physicists, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013.
View at: MathSciNet
V. L. Okulov, J. N. Sørensen, and D. H. Wood, “The rotor theories by Professor Joukowsky: vortex theories,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 73, pp. 19–46, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Longqing Fan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1355

Downloads

840

Citations