Research Article
Robustness Analysis of an Outranking Model Parameters’ Elicitation Method in the Presence of Noisy Examples
Table 4
Results of post hoc analysis for sets
S10 and
S20. Summary of the adjusted
values obtained from different tests.
(a) Adjusted values obtained for set with different tests |
| Test | Indicator | Comparisons among levels of noise | 0% versus 5% | 0% versus 10% | 0% versus 20% | 0% versus 50% |
| Bonferroni-Dunn | | 1.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00954 | 0.00121 | Holm | | 1.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00716 | 0.00121 | Finner | | 0.60988 | 0.76832 | 0.00476 | 0.00120 | Li | | 0.68609 | 0.76832 | 0.01019 | 0.00130 |
|
|
(b) Adjusted values obtained for set with different tests |
| Test | Indicator | Comparisons among levels of noise | 0% versus 5% | 0% versus 10% | 0% versus 20% | 0% versus 50% |
| Bonferroni-Dunn | | 1.00000 | 0.73796 | 0.02730 | 0.00000 | Holm | | 0.55575 | 0.36898 | 0.02407 | 0.00000 | Finner | | 0.55575 | 0.23809 | 0.01360 | 0.00000 | Li | | 0.55575 | 0.29343 | 0.01513 | 0.00000 |
|
|