Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Mathematical Problems in Engineering / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Mathematical Theories and Applications for Nonlinear Control Systems

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 2831561 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2831561

Unbiased Minimum Variance Estimation for Discrete-Time Systems with Measurement Delay and Unknown Measurement Disturbance

Academic Editor: Xue-Jun Xie
Received16 Aug 2018
Accepted09 Sep 2018
Published25 Sep 2018

Abstract

This paper addresses the state estimation problem for stochastic systems with unknown measurement disturbances whose any prior information is unknown and measurement delay resulting from the inherent limited bandwidth. For such complex systems, the Kalman-like one-step predictor independent of unknown measurement disturbances is designed based on the linear unbiased minimum variance criterion and the reorganized innovation analysis approach. One simulation example shows the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.

1. Introduction

In recent years, networked control systems have attracted much attention and much work has been done due to the wide applications in communication systems [1, 2], fault detection [3, 4], and sensor [5]. However, these networks are usually unreliable and may lead to measurement delays due to inherent limited bandwidth. According to different kinds of time delay, many results have sprung up, such as control input delay [6, 7], state-dependent delay [8], state-independent delay [911], output delay [12, 13], communication delay [14], distributed-delay [1517], and time-varying delay [18, 19]. In addition, the unknown disturbances in system modeling or external environment are ubiquitous feature in the piratical systems. The measurement delays and unknown observation disturbances can influence the performance or even results in systems instability. For these reasons, it is not surprising that the study of the state estimation problem for systems with time-delays and unknown observation disturbances has been an enthusiasm for a large number of scholars.

The early work on the discrete-time systems with time delay has been investigated by system augmentation [20] or partial difference Riccati equation approach [21]. In [21], the partial difference Riccati equation approach is used to settle the measurement delay problem for linear systems. In order to lessen the computational cost (compared with state augmentation approach and partial difference Riccati equation approach), [22] proposes the reorganized innovation approach, by calculating two standard Riccati difference equations of the same dimension as the original system; the authors solve the finite horizon estimation problem for measurement delayed systems. In [23], the linear minimum mean square estimation filter for systems with measurement delay is calculated in terms of two Riccati difference equations and one Lyapunov difference equation. It should be pointed that all the aforementioned estimators do not consider the disturbance in observation.

In practice, the unknown disturbances in system modeling or external environment are another ubiquitous feature [2426]. The early works on unbiased minimum variance problems with observation disturbances can be traced back to [27]. For these unknown disturbances without any prior knowledge, unbiased minimum variance filter instead of Kalman filter is more effective in tracing the true state. Reference [28] obtains a more general unbiased estimator using the approach in [27] and presents the convergence analysis of the estimator. In [29], the authors considers global optimality of unbiased estimator based on [27, 28]. In [30], the authors considers event-based state estimation of linear dynamic systems with unknown inputs. Different from the aforementioned methods about linear discrete-time systems with observation disturbance, [31, 32] solve the state estimation with partially observed inputs problem without adding unbiased constraint. However, [2833] only consider the state estimation problem of the state equation with unknown input. It should be pointed that measurement disturbances are ubiquitous feature in practical systems and the estimation problems for discrete-time systems with unknown measurement disturbance are also important. Motivated by the preceding works about measurement delay and unknown measurement disturbance, we study linear unbiased estimation for discrete-time systems with measurement delay and unknown measurement disturbance in this paper. By employing the linear unbiased minimum variance approach and the reorganized innovation analysis approach, one Kalman-like one-step ahead predictor is derived in terms of two Riccati difference equations of the same dimension with the state model, which may reduce the computation when delay is large, compared with the classic state augmentation approach [20] and partial difference Riccati equation approach [21, 34]. Further, just like the stability of the classical Kalman filter [35] and the mean square stability analysis [36], we develop a parallel to obtain the stability properties of the proposed unbiased estimator under standard conditions.

The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we present the problem statement, some assumptions and remarks. In Section 3, we deduce the state estimation according to the reorganized innovation analysis approach, then we obtain the finite and infinite horizon filter based on the linear unbiased minimum variance criterion, respectively. In Section 4, a numerical example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. In Section 5, we provide some concluding remarks.

Notation. Throughout this paper, the superscripts “” and “” represent the inverse and transpose of a matrix. denotes the n-dimensional Euclidean space. is the set of all real matrices. for and . denotes the linear subspace spanned by the measurement sequence .   denotes the ith eigenvalue of a square matrix . Furthermore, the mathematical expectation operator is denoted by .

2. Problems Statement and Preliminary

Consider the following linear system:where , , and are the state, current, and delayed measurement, respectively. is the process noise, and are the measurement noises. and are the unknown measurement disturbances without any prior knowledge. For simplicity of presentation, we assume that , , , , and are constant matrices with suitable dimensions even though the later development and results can be easily adapted to the time-varying case.

Assumption 1. , , and are uncorrelated white noises of zero mean and covariance as

Assumption 2. The initial state is uncorrelated with , , and and satisfies

Assumption 3. ;  .

To the estimation problems of stochastic systems, Assumptions 1 and 2 are general. Assumption 3 guarantees the existence of the following predictors designed.

For convenience, the measurement can be rewritten as follows:

Problem. For the given measurements , our aim is to design a minimum variance unbiased Kalman-like one-step predictor . Further, we will consider the infinite horizon predictor design .

Remark 4. As for time delay systems, we can settle the estimation problem by using the state augmentation approach or partial difference Riccati equation approach. However the augmented approach or partial difference Riccati equation approach may bring expensive computational cost when the delay is large [22]. In the following, we will deduce the estimation problem based on the reorganized innovation approach and linear minimum variance unbiased criterion instead of the augmented approach.

3. Main Results

3.1. Finite Horizon Estimation

We note that is an additional measurement of the state which is obtained at time instant with time delay , so the measurement consists of time delay when . Apparently, the linear space contains the same information as , where the new observations and are provided as follows:Obviously, and satisfywhereIt is obvious that the new measurements and are delay-free and the associated measurement noises and are white noises with zero mean and covariance matrices , .

Theorem 5. When , based on linear minimum variance unbiased criterion, we produce a recursive state estimator decoupling with the disturbance for system (1), (7), and (8) in the Kalman-like form:whereThe prediction error covariance matrix is computed byAs for and , they are obtained bywhereThe prediction error covariance matrix is computed by

Proof. When , from (1) and (16), we have the prediction error equation as follows:Assume to be unbiased; in order to guarantee that be an unbiased estimate of , we must have , then we haveSubstituting (25) into (24), (24) can be rewritten asFrom (26), the prediction error covariance matrix is computed bywhere and are given by (19) and (20). In order to minimize the estimation error variance (27) under the constraint (25), we introduce an auxiliary equationwhere is the Lagrange multipliers. Taking the derivatives with respect to equal to zero yieldsCombining (25) and (29) gives the matrix equationEquation (30) has a unique solution if and only if the coefficients is nonsingular. Due to Assumption 3 and the fact that is nonsingular, the coefficient matrix of (30) is nonsingular. Obviously, premultiplying left- and right-hand sides of (30) by the inverse of coefficient matrix yields (19) and (21). When , the proof is similar to the case , so we omit it here.

Remark 6. The system dimension will get more and more higher with the increase of time delay d; thus, computational complexity will get higher when using the classical state augmentation approach. But when we adopt the reorganized innovation analysis approach, we only need to solve two Riccati equations which have the same order of the state equation, so it can greatly reduce the computational complexity compared with the classical augmentation approach when time delay d is large.

3.2. Infinite Horizon Estimation

In this subsection, we consider the steady unbiased estimator design. First, let us present the lemma below as the initial step for the convergence analysis.

Lemma 7. If there exist such thatfor , then the sequence abided by (22) is bounded for any given any initial condition .

Proof. Let us consider a suboptimal unbiased filter as follows:where . Then the following state estimation error is given bywith the associated covariance matrix being given byThus is bounded for any nonnegative initial condition due to the fact that . Comparing the above suboptimal estimator to the designed optimal estimator, the optimality tell us that for the same initial value. This proves the boundedness of .

Theorem 8. If there exist such that , and is stabilizable, then abided by (22) converges to a unique fixed point for any initial condition, where is computed byandWhen , we have the state predictor as follows:When , the state predictor is as follows:whereThe prediction error covariance matrix is computed by

Proof. By simple calculation, the Riccati equation in (22) can be formulated asThen according to [35, 37] and Lemma 7, the convergence analysis can be readily obtained and we omitted here.

Remark 9. Under the condition that , and is stabilizable, we have obtained the steady-state filter (40). This is important when one desires to replace the time-varying filter with the corresponding steady-state version to reduce estimator complexity. On the other hand, the filter in (42) only iterates steps; hence we can implement the estimator in finite horizon on the basis of the steady-state filter (40).

4. Numerical Example

In this section, we present a numerical example to manifest the proposed approach about linear optimal estimation. Consider the linear discrete-time system with measurement delay and unknown observation disturbancewhere , , , , , , , and are whites noises with zero mean and covariances , and , respectively.

According to Theorem 5, the simulation results are given in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. From the simulation results, we observe that the estimator can track the true state well, which proves that our proposed approach in this paper is effective. According to Theorem 8, we obtain the following steady estimator:where

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we have proposed a linear minimum unbiased predictor for discrete-time systems with measurement delay and unknown measurement disturbance. Firstly, we have used the reorganized innovation analysis approach to deal with the measurement delay. In this way, one has avoided the giant computation brought by the augmentation approach or partial difference Riccati equation approach. Then based on the linear unbiased minimum variance criterion, we have calculated the minimum variance unbiased predictor, which is designed by calculating two Riccati equations with the same dimension as the state model. The future study direction is to consider the linear unbiased estimation for discrete-time systems with packet dropping and unknown disturbance, where the unknown disturbance appears in both the state equation and the measurement equation.

Data Availability

The simulation data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Except for simulation data, no data is used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2016FM17) and the Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M612336).

References

  1. T. Zhang, W. Chen, Z. Han, and Z. Cao, “A cross-layer perspective on energy harvesting-aided green communications over fading channels,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1519–1534, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. Zhang, J. Zhang, and H. C. So, “Mean square deviation analysis of LMS and NLMS algorithms with white reference inputs,” Signal Processing, vol. 131, pp. 20–26, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. Li, H. R. Karimi, Q. Zhang, D. Zhao, and Y. Li, “Fault detection for linear discrete time-varying systems subject to random sensor delay: a riccati equation approach,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1707–1716, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Y. Ren, A. Wang, and H. Wang, “Fault diagnosis and tolerant control for discrete stochastic distribution collaborative control systems,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 462–471, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Yadegar, F. Karami, and J. H. Nobari, “A new control structure to reduce time delay of tracking sensors by applying an angular position sensor,” ISA Transactions, vol. 63, pp. 133–139, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. Meinsma and L. Mirkin, “H control of systems with multiple I/O delays via decomposition to adobe problems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 199–211, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  7. X. Tan, J. Cao, X. Li, and A. Alsaedi, “Leader-following mean square consensus of stochastic multi-agent systems with input delay via event-triggered control,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 299–309, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  8. X. Li and J. Wu, “Sufficient stability conditions of nonlinear differential systems under impulsive control with state-dependent delay,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 306–311, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  9. X. Yan and X. Song, “Global practical tracking by output feedback for nonlinear systems with unknown growth rate and time delay,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 713081, 7 pages, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  10. X. Yan, X. Song, and X. Wang, “Global output-feedback stabilization for nonlinear time-delay systems with unknown control coefficients,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1550–1557, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Zhang, C.-R. Zhao, and X.-J. Xie, “Global output feedback stabilisation of stochastic high-order feedforward nonlinear systems with time-delay,” International Journal of Control, vol. 88, no. 12, pp. 2477–2487, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  12. Z. Duan, X. Song, and M. Qin, “Limited memory optimal filter for discrete-time systems with measurement delay,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 68, pp. 422–430, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. X. Song, J. H. Park, and X. Yan, “Linear estimation for measurement-delay systems with periodic coefficients and multiplicative noise,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 4124–4130, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  14. Z. Wang, H. Zhang, X. Song, and H. Zhang, “Consensus problems for discrete-time agents with communication delay,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1515–1523, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. Hou, Z. Wu, M. Fu, and H. Zhang, “Constrained consensus of discrete-time multi-agent systems with time delay,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 947–953, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  16. L. Chao, “Hybrid delayed synchronizations of complex chaotic systems in modulus-phase spaces and its application,” Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 11, no. 4, Article ID 041010, 8 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. B. Y. Zhang, J. Lam, and S. Y. Xu, “Stability analysis of distributed delay neural networks based on relaxed Lyapunov-Krasovskii Functionals,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1480–1492, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Gao, F. Yuan, and Y. Wu, “Global stabilisation of high-order non-linear systems with time-varying delays,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 1737–1744, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  19. F. Gao, Y. Wu, and F. Yuan, “Global output feedback stabilisation of high-order nonlinear systems with multiple time-varying delays,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 2382–2392, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  20. L. Xiao, A. Hassibi, and J. P. How, “Control with random communication delays via a discrete-time jump system approach,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, vol. 3, pp. 2199–2204, Chicago, Ill, USA, June 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  21. I. Y. Song, D. Y. Kim, V. Shin, and M. Jeon, “Receding horizon filtering for discrete-time linear systems with state and observation delays,” IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 263–271, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. Zhang, L. Xie, D. Zhang, and Y. C. Soh, “A reorganized innovation approach to linear estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1810–1814, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  23. X. Song and J. H. Park, “Linear optimal estimation for discrete-time measurement delay systems with multichannel multiplicative noise,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 156–160, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C.-R. Zhao, X.-J. Xie, and N. Duan, “Adaptive state-feedback stabilization for high-order stochastic nonlinear systems driven by noise of unknown covariance,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 246579, 13 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  25. X. Xie and M. Jiang, “Output feedback stabilization of stochastic feedforward nonlinear time-delay systems with unknown output function,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 266–280, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. N. Duan, H. Min, and X. Qin, “Adaptive stabilization of stochastic nonlinear systems disturbed by unknown time delay and covariance noise,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 8084529, 9 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  27. P. K. Kitanidis, “Unbiased minimum-variance linear state estimation,” Automatica, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 775–778, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Darouach and M. Zasadzinski, “Unbiased minimum variance estimation for systems with unknown exogenous inputs,” Automatica, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 717–719, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  29. W. S. Kerwin and J. L. Prince, “On the optimality of recursive unbiased state estimation with unknown inputs,” Automatica, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1381–1383, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  30. D. Shi, T. Chen, and M. Darouach, “Event-based state estimation of linear dynamic systems with unknown exogenous inputs,” Automatica, vol. 69, pp. 275–288, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  31. B. Li, “State estimation with partially observed inputs: a unified Kalman filtering approach,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 816–820, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  32. J. Su, B. Li, and W.-H. Chen, “On existence, optimality and asymptotic stability of the Kalman filter with partially observed inputs,” Automatica, vol. 53, pp. 149–154, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  33. Y. Li, “State estimation for stochastic discrete-time systems with multiplicative noises and unknown inputs over fading channels,” Applied Mathematics Computation, vol. 320, pp. 116–130, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. X. Song and X. Yan, “Linear quadratic Gaussian control for linear time-delay systems,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 375–383, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  35. B. Anderson and J. Moore, Optimal Filtering, Prentice Hall, 1979.
  36. H. Zhang, X. Song, and L. Shi, “Convergence and mean square stability of suboptimal estimator for systems with measurement packet dropping,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1248–1253, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  37. H. Fang and R. A. de Callafon, “On the asymptotic stability of minimum-variance unbiased input and state estimation,” Automatica, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3183–3186, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet

Copyright © 2018 Yu Guan and Xinmin Song. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

463 Views | 241 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.