Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2018, Article ID 3730649, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3730649
Research Article

Key Characteristics of a Floating Slab Track Based on Longitudinal Interaction Analysis

1Department of Civil Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Gyeonggi-do 17104, Republic of Korea
2Department of Transportation System Engineering, Graduate School of Transportation, Korea National University of Transportation, Gyeonggi-do 16106, Republic of Korea
3Department of Civil Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, 1200 Larimer Street, Denver, CO 80217, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Heeyoung Lee; rk.ca.uhk@8090gnuoyeeh and Wonseok Chung; rk.ca.uhk@gnuhcsw

Received 26 January 2018; Revised 23 April 2018; Accepted 6 May 2018; Published 26 July 2018

Academic Editor: Francesco Pellicano

Copyright © 2018 Goo Sam Jee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. T. Nelson, “Recent developments in ground-borne noise and vibration control,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 367–376, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Lombaert, G. Degrande, B. Vanhauwere, B. Vandeborght, and S. François, “The control of ground-borne vibrations from railway traffic by means of continuous floating slabs,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 297, no. 3-5, pp. 946–961, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. D. Henn, “System comparison: ballasted track - slab track,” Rail Engineering International, vol. 22, no. 2, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. N. Bilow and G. M. Randich, “Slab track for the next 100 years. Presented at the AREMA,” in Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Conference, 2000.
  5. Korea Rail Network Authority, Guideline of Railway Design , 2011 (Korean).
  6. P. Grootenhuis, “Floating track slab isolation for railways,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 443–448, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S.-T. Yen and Y.-H. Lee, “Parameter identification and analysis of a slab track system using 3D ABAQUS program,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 288–297, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Degrande, D. Clouteau, R. Othman et al., “A numerical model for ground-borne vibrations from underground railway traffic based on a periodic finite element-boundary element formulation,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 293, no. 3-5, pp. 645–666, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. G. Wagner and A. Herrmann, “Floating slab track above ground for turnouts in tram lines,” Noise and Vibration Mitigation for Rail Transportation Systems, vol. 99, pp. 86–93, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Yuan, Y. Chang, Z. Meng, and L. Song, “Modal analysis and parameter assessment of floating slab track,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Engineering, ICTE 2009, pp. 3294–3299, July 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. International Union of Railways, Track/Bridge Interaction. Recommendations for Calculations, CODE 774-3R, UIC, 2nd edition, 2001.
  12. Land Transport and Maritime R&D Report, Development of Low Vibration Track (Floating Slab Track) And Technology for Improvement of Performance of Long-Span Bridges , 2011 (Korean).
  13. Z. G. Li and T. X. Wu, “On vehicle/track impact at connection between a floating slab and ballasted track and floating slab track's effectiveness of force isolation,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 513–531, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. ABAQUS Inc, ABAQUS/Standard User's Manual, ABAQUS Inc., Pawtucket, RI, USA, 2007.
  15. Pandrol, “Testing of in-line SFC on Rheda 2000 to KHSRC specification,” Tech. Rep. 46011-9, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  16. ACI Committee 209, 209.2R-08 Guide for Modeling and Calculating Shrinkage and Creep in Hardened Concrete, American Concrete Institute, 2008.
  17. Z. P. Bažant and S. Baweja, “Justification and refinements of model B3 for concrete creep and shrinkage 1. statistics and sensitivity,” Materials and Structures, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 415–430, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Z. P. Bazant, “Criteria for rational prediction of creep and shrinkage of concrete,” ACI Special Publications, vol. 194, pp. 237–260, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  19. C. F. M. Code, CEB-FIP Model Code for Concrete Structures, Euro-International Committe for Concrete, Bulletin, 1990.
  20. N. J. Gardner and M. J. Lockman, “Design provisions for drying shrinkage and creep of normal strength concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 159–167, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus