Evaluation Index System and Evaluation Method of China’s Regional Potential for Electrical Energy Substitution

Table 7

The connection degrees between each object to be evaluated and the ideal point and the negative ideal point.

No.	Evaluation object
1	Beijing
2	Shanghai
3	Tianjin		0.4797+0.5203i
4	Chongqing		0.4716+0.5284i
5	Sichuan		0.2626+0.497i+0.2404j
6	Hebei	0.5756+0.3665i+0.0579j	0.3522+0.5937i+0.0541j
7	Shanxi	0.4452+0.3764i+0.1784j	0.3895+0.6105i
8	Shandong	0.765+0.235i	0.2895+0.3557i+0.3548j
9	Jiangsu	0.5022+0.3194i+0.1784j	0.4127+0.5377i+0.0495j
10	Zhejiang	0.3917+0.4299i+0.1784j	0.4129+0.5525i+0.0346j
11	Anhui	0.3928+0.6072i	0.4417+0.5583i
12	Fujian	0.3499+0.5961i+0.0541j	0.455+0.5237i+0.0212j
13	Hubei	0.3463+0.4753i+0.1784j	0.4259+0.5741i
14	Hunan	0.3568+0.4648i+0.1784j	0.4273+0.5727i
15	Henan	0.6496+0.3504i	0.196+0.6256i+0.1784j
16	Jiangxi	0.3512+0.5868i+0.062j	0.4749+0.5251i
17	Liaoning	0.4007+0.4208i+0.1784j	0.4206+0.5794i
18	Shaanxi	0.4407+0.5593i	0.3772+0.6228i
19	Gansu	0.2427+0.5789i+0.1784j	0.5208+0.4792i
20	Ningxia	0.173+0.6485i+0.1784j	0.6591+0.3409i
21	Xinjiang	0.3462+0.3978i+0.2561j	0.4616+0.4805i+0.0579j
22	Heilongjiang	0.3627+0.4588i+0.1784j	0.4134+0.5866i
23	Inner Mongolia	0.4104+0.4112i+0.1784j	0.4272+0.5728i
24	Qinghai	0.1155+0.4072i+0.4772j	0.8416+0.1584i
25	Jilin	0.2487+0.5271i+0.2242j	0.53+0.47i