Research Article
Improved Cost-Sensitive Support Vector Machine Classifier for Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Table 9
Comparison of our proposed approach with previous works.
| Author | Year | Model | Dataset | ACC(%) | AMC | G-mean(%) | Sen(%) | Spec(%) |
| Karabatak[41] | 2009 | Neural network classification with association rules for reducing the dimension. | WBC | 95.60 | — | — | — | — | Zheng[22] | 2014 | Support vector machine algorithms with K-means for feature extraction | WBC | 97.38 | — | — | — | — | Nahato[42] | 2015 | Rough set indiscernibility relation method and the backpropagation neural network | WBC | 98.61 | — | 98.60 | 98.76 | 98.57 | Wang[20] | 2018 | SVM-based ensemble learning algorithm | WBC | 97.10 | — | 97.17 | 97.11 | 97.23 | WDBC | 97.68 | — | 97.09 | 94.75 | 99.49 | Proposed | — | Cost-sensitive SVM with IG for feature selection | WBC | 98.74 | 0.064 | 98.13 | 97.88 | 98.38 | WDBC | 98.83 | 0.129 | 97.35 | 99.01 | 95.71 |
|
|
Note: the symbol of “ ” represent the optimal value for each performance. |