Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2018, Article ID 5145419, 17 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5145419
Research Article

Influence of the Choice of Lunar Gravity Model on Orbit Determination for Lunar Orbiters

Lunar Exploration Operation Team, Korea Aerospace Research Institute, Daejeon 34133, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Young-Rok Kim; rk.er.irak@mikry

Received 8 September 2017; Revised 15 December 2017; Accepted 26 December 2017; Published 1 February 2018

Academic Editor: Viktor Avrutin

Copyright © 2018 Young-Rok Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y.-J. Song, Y.-R. Kim, J. Bae, and B.-Y. Kim, “Evolution of the Selenopotential Model and Its Effects on the Propagation Accuracy of Orbits around the Moon,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 5493679, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. E. Slojkowski, “Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter orbit determination accuracy analysis,” in Proceedings of the in Proceedings of 24th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics (ISSFD), Laurel, Md, USA, May 2014.
  3. E. Mazarico, D. D. Rowlands, G. A. Neumann et al., “Orbit determination of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter,” Journal of Geodesy, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 193–207, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Mazarico, S. Goossens, F. G. Lemoine, G. A. Neumann, M. H. Torrence, and D. D. Rowlands, “Improved orbit determination of lunar orbiters with lunar gravity fields obtained by the GRAIL mission,” in Proceedings of 44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, LPI Contribution No. 1719, Woodlands, Tex, USA, March 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Yan, Z. Zhong, F. Li et al., “Comparison analyses on the 150 × 150 lunar gravity field models by gravity/topography admittance, correlation and precision orbit determination,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 512–520, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Maier and O. Baur, “Orbit determination and gravity field recovery from Doppler tracking data to the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 122, pp. 94–100, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. G. R. Lemoine, D. E. Smith, M. T. Zuber, G. A. Neumann, and D. D. Rowlands, “A 70th degree lunar gravity model (GLGM-2) from Clementine and other tracking data,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, vol. 102, no. 7, Article ID 97JE01418, pp. 16339–16359, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. S. Konopliv and D. N. Yuan, “Lunar Prospector 100th degree gravity model development,” in in Proceedings of 30th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 1067, vol. 281, Houston, Tex, USA, March 1999.
  9. A. S. Konopliv, S. W. Asmar, E. Carranza, W. L. Sjogren, and D. N. Yuan, “Recent gravity models as a result of the Lunar Prospector mission,” Icarus, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. T. Zuber, D. E. Smith, M. M. Watkins et al., “Gravity field of the moon from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6120, pp. 668–671, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. S. Konopliv, R. S. Park, D.-N. Yuan et al., “The JPL lunar gravity field to spherical harmonic degree 660 from the GRAIL Primary Mission,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 1415–1434, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. S. Konopliv, R. S. Park, D.-N. Yuan et al., “High-resolution lunar gravity fields from the GRAIL Primary and Extended Missions,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1452–1458, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. G. Lemoine, S. Goossens, T. J. Sabaka et al., “GRGM900C: A degree 900 lunar gravity model from GRAIL primary and extended mission data,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 3382–3389, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  14. D. Arnold, S. Bertone, A. Jäggi, G. Beutler, and L. Mervart, “GRAIL gravity field determination using the Celestial Mechanics Approach,” Icarus, vol. 261, pp. 182–192, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Krauss, B. Klinger, O. Baur, and T. Mayer-Gürr, “Development of the lunar gravity field model GrazLGM300a,” Vermessung Geoinformation 2+3, pp. 156–161, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  16. D. A. Vallado, R. S. Hujsak, T. M. Johnson, J. H. Seago, and J. W. Woodburn, “Orbit determination using ODTK version 6,” in Proceedings of the in Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and Techniques (ICATT), Madrid, Spain, May 2010.
  17. L. Policastri, J. P. Carrico, C. Nickel, A. Kam, R. Lebois, and R. Sherman, “Orbit determination and acquisition for LADEE and LLCD mission operations,” in Proceedings of the in Proceedings of 25th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Williamsburg, Va, USA, January 2015.
  18. S. Slojkowski, J. Lowe, and J. Woodburn, “Orbit determination for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter using an extended Kalman filter,” in Proceedings of the in Proceedings of 25th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics (ISSFD), Munich, Germany, October 2015.
  19. E. Fantino and S. Casotto, “Methods of harmonic synthesis for global geopotential models and their first-, second- and third-order gradients,” Journal of Geodesy, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 595–619, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus