Evaluating University Reputation Based on Integral Linear Programming with Grey Possibility

Table 6

Effective criteria weights for UR evaluation.

First-level indicators,	Average; normalized ratings,	First-level; weights, (%)	Second-level; indicators,	Average; normalized ratings,	Local; second-level; weights,	Effective second-level weights, (%)
	0.3935	13.8737		0.3393	0.2307	3.2011
				0.7377	0.5017	6.9605
				0.3935	0.2676	3.7122
	0.7002	24.6915		0.4036	0.2078	5.1321
				0.9018	0.4644	11.4677
				0.6363	0.3277	8.0917
	0.5536	19.5198		0.6911	0.3468	6.7702
				0.6548	0.3286	6.4145
				0.6467	0.3246	6.3351
	0.3804	13.4120		0.4369	0.4124	5.5306
				0.3435	0.3242	4.3476
				0.2792	0.2635	3.5338
	0.6357	22.4163		0.6095	0.3253	7.2917
				0.7119	0.3799	8.5165
				0.5524	0.2948	6.6081
	0.1726	6.0868		0.3435	0.3725	2.2673
				0.1625	0.1762	1.0728
				0.4161	0.4513	2.7467
Total	2.8356	100	-	9.2600	6	100