Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2018, Article ID 5858272, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5858272
Research Article

Weighted Evidence Combination Rule Based on Evidence Distance and Uncertainty Measure: An Application in Fault Diagnosis

1School of Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China
2Dean’s Office, Chongqing Aerospace Polytechnic College, Chongqing 400021, China
3Department of Computer Engineering, Chongqing Aerospace Polytechnic College, Chongqing 400021, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Jun Sang; nc.ude.uqc@gnasj

Received 29 May 2017; Revised 3 September 2017; Accepted 15 November 2017; Published 17 January 2018

Academic Editor: Josefa Mula

Copyright © 2018 Lei Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. P. Dempster, “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 38, pp. 325–339, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. Y. Song, X. Wang, and H. Zhang, “A distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy belief functions,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 86, pp. 288–298, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Shafer et al., A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1976. View at MathSciNet
  4. M. Beynon, B. Curry, and P. Morgan, “The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modelling,” Omega , vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 37–50, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Z. Dou, X. Xu, Y. Lin, and R. Zhou, “Application of D-S evidence fusion method in the fault detection of temperature sensor,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 395057, 6 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. X. Deng, Y. Hu, Y. Deng, and S. Mahadevan, “Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, pp. 156–167, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. X. Xu, S. Li, X. Song, C. Wen, and D. Xu, “The optimal design of industrial alarm systems based on evidence theory,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 46, pp. 142–156, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Chen, A. B. Cremers, and Z. Cao, “Interactive color image segmentation via iterative evidential labeling,” Information Fusion, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 292–304, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Suh and J. Yook, “A method to determine basic probability assignment in context awareness of a moving object,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 2013, Article ID 972641, 7 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. A. Zadeh, “A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination,” AI Magazine, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 85–90, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Leung, N.-N. Ji, and J.-H. Ma, “An integrated information fusion approach based on the theory of evidence and group decision-making,” Information Fusion, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 410–422, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. A. Khamseh, A. K. Sedigh, B. Moshiri, and A. Fatehi, “Control performance assessment based on sensor fusion techniques,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 49, pp. 14–28, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Niu, Y. Wei, Y. Shi, and H. R. Karimi, “A novel evaluation model for hybrid power system based on vague set and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 784389, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Q. Zhou, H. Zhou, Q. Zhou, F. Yang, L. Luo, and T. Li, “Structural damage detection based on posteriori probability support vector machine and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 36, pp. 368–374, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Xu, Z. Zhong, and L. Xu, “ISHM-oriented adaptive fault diagnostics for avionics based on a distributed intelligent agent system,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 46, no. 13, pp. 2287–2302, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. A. Zadeh, “Review of a mathematical theory of evidence,” AI Magazine, vol. 5, no. 3, article 81, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  17. E. Lefevre, O. Colot, and P. Vannoorenberghe, “Belief function combination and conflict management,” Information Fusion, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 149–162, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. Torra, Y. Narukawa, and S. Miyamoto, “Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence: Theory, Tools and Applications,” in Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3558 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 1–8, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. C. K. Murphy, “Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Voorbraak, “On the justification of Dempster's rule of combination,” Artificial Intelligence. An International Journal, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 171–197, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. R. R. Yager, “On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules,” Information Sciences, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 93–137, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. K. Yamada, “A new combination of evidence based on compromise,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 159, no. 13, pp. 1689–1708, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Han, C. Han, and Y. Yang, “A modified evidence combination approach based on ambiguity measure,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Fusion, FUSION '08, Cologne, Germany, July 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Dubois and H. Prade, “Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 244–264, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. P. Smets, “Combination of evidence in the transferable belief model,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 447–458, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Yong, S. WenKang, Z. ZhenFu, and L. Qi, “Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 489–493, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. Han, Y. Deng, C. Han, and Z. Hou, “Weighted evidence combination based on distance of evidence and uncertainty measure,” Journal of Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 396–400, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. X. Fan and M. J. Zuo, “Fault diagnosis of machines based on D-S evidence theory. Part 1: D-S evidence theory and its improvement,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 366–376, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. W. Zhu, H. Yang, Y. Jin, and B. Liu, “A Method for Recognizing Fatigue Driving Based on Dempster-Shafer Theory and Fuzzy Neural Network,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 6191035, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. W. Jiang, B. Wei, X. Qin, J. Zhan, and Y. Tang, “Sensor Data Fusion Based on a New Conflict Measure,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 5769061, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. Liu, “Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 170, no. 11, pp. 909–924, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. H. Zheng, Y. Deng, and Y. Hu, “Fuzzy evidential influence diagram and its evaluation algorithm,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 131, pp. 28–45, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. J. Qian, X. Guo, and Y. Deng, “A novel method for combining conflicting evidences based on information entropy,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 876–888, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A.-L. Jousselme and P. Maupin, On some properties of distances in evidence theory, Belief, Brest, France.
  35. D. Fixsen and R. P. S. Mahler, “The modified Dempster-Shafer approach to classification,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 96–104, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. H. Guo, W. Shi, and Y. Deng, “Evaluating sensor reliability in classification problems based on evidence theory,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 970–981, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. B. Ristic and P. Smets, “The TBM global distance measure for the association of uncertain combat ID declarations,” Information Fusion, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 276–284, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Ristic and P. Smets, “Global cost of assignment in the TBM framework for association of uncertain ID reports,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 303–309, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. L. Jousselme, D. Grenier, and É. Bossé, “A new distance between two bodies of evidence,” Information Fusion, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91–101, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. Wen, Y. Wang, and X. Xu, “Fuzzy Information Fusion Algorithm of Fault Diagnosis Based on Similarity Measure of Evidence,” in Advances in Neural Networks-ISNN, pp. 506–515, Springer, Berlin, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  41. Z. Sunberg and J. Rogers, “A belief function distance metric for orderable sets,” Information Fusion, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 361–373, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. F. Cuzzolin, “A geometric approach to the theory of evidence,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 522–534, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. Wang, Y. Hu, F. Xiao, X. Deng, and Y. Deng, “A novel method to use fuzzy soft sets in decision making based on ambiguity measure and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: an application in medical diagnosis,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 69, pp. 1–11, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. F. Baldwin, “A Calculus for Mass Assignments in Evidential Reasoning,” in Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp. 513–531, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, NJ, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  45. E. Lefevre, O. Colot, P. Vannoorenberghe, and D. De Brucq, “Contribution des mesures d’information à la modélisation crédibiliste de connaissances,” TS. Traitement du signal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 87–97, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  46. S. Fabre, A. Appriou, and X. Briottet, “Presentation and description of two classification methods using data fusion based on sensor management,” Information Fusion, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49–71, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus