Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Volume 2018, Article ID 6496379, 9 pages

https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6496379

## Study on Force Schemes in Pseudopotential Lattice Boltzmann Model for Two-Phase Flows

State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Bo Wang; nc.ude.ucs@obgnaw

Received 7 July 2017; Revised 11 October 2017; Accepted 22 November 2017; Published 9 January 2018

Academic Editor: Manfred Krafczyk

Copyright © 2018 Yong Peng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Multiphase flows are very important in industrial application. In present study, the force schemes in the pseudopotential LBM for two-phase flows have been compared in detail and the force schemes include Shan-Chen, EDM, MED, and Guo’s schemes. Numerical simulations confirm that all four schemes are consistent with the Laplace law. For Shan-Chen scheme, the smaller is, the smaller the surface tension is. However, for other schemes, has no effect on surface tension. When , the achieved density ratio will reduce as reduces. During this range of , the maximum density ratio of EDM scheme will be greater than that of other schemes. For a constant , the curves of the maximum spurious currents has a minimum value which is corresponding to except for EDM schemes. In the region of , will reduce as decreases. On the other hand, in the area of , will increase as decreases. However, for EDM scheme, will increase as increases.

#### 1. Introduction

Multiphase flows are very important in industrial application [1]. Recently, the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) has been applied widely for studying the two-phase flows and demonstrated its advantages [2–4]. The LBM for two-phase flows can be divided into the following four kinds: pseudopotential model [5, 6], free energy model [7], kinetic theory based model [8], and color model [9, 10], in which the pseudopotential LBM is very popular because of its simplicity.

In pseudopotential LBM, the interactions between fluids are simulated by an artificial interparticle potential. So, the force scheme is very important to simulate two-phase flows accurately. There are four main kinds of force schemes in the pseudopotential LBM: the first is Shan and Chen’s force scheme [5, 6], the second is the Exact Difference Method (EDM) scheme [11–13], the third is Method of Explicit Derivative (MED) scheme [8], and the last is Guo’s scheme which considered the discrete lattice effects [14]. Shan [15] showed that the spurious current present in LBM is due to the insufficient isotropy of operator and proposed a method to improve it. Shan [16] proposed a general approach of calculating the pressure tensor for nonideal gas LBM. Yu and Fan [17] combined adaptive mesh refinement method and lattice Boltzmann method to improve the two-phase flow simulation. It should be noted that the EDM scheme is Galilean invariant and the results obtained by EDM scheme do not depend on relaxation time [11, 18]. Kupershtokh et al. [13] compared three kinds of approximation of the gradient of special potential (“local,” “mean-value,” and “general”) and showed that the “general” approximation was most precise and stable. Moreover, the maximal density ratio was larger than for the van der Waals Equation of State and up to for the Carnahan-Starling Equation of State. Recently, Huang et al. [19] and Sun et al. [20] investigated the performance of different forcing schemes in the pseudopotential LBM. Li et al. [21] carried out a theoretical analysis of the Shan-Chen and EDM schemes in the pseudopotential LBM. Hu et al. [22] carried out the comparative analysis of different force schemes in pseudopotential LBM. Zheng et al. [23] studied the different force treatments in detail in Shan-Chen two-phase LBM by theoretical analysis.

Based on above analysis, although some studies have been carried out on the force schemes in pseudopotential LBM, but the detailed comparison of different force schemes is scarce in available literature. In present study, a detailed comparison of force schemes including Shan-Chen, EDM, MED, and Guo’s schemes will be carried out.

#### 2. Pseudopotential Lattice Boltzmann Model for Two-Phase Flows

##### 2.1. Shan-Chen Scheme

The first pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann model for two-phase flows is proposed by Shan and Chen [5, 6] and is expressed as follows:

The equilibrium distribution functions can be calculated by

The density and flow velocity can be obtained by the following:The actual fluid velocity can be defined according to Ginzburg and Adler [24] as

##### 2.2. EDM Scheme

The pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann model with EDM [11, 12] can readwhere , and the equilibrium distribution function is shown as follows:

The real fluid velocity can be obtained from Ginzburg and Adler [24] as follows:

##### 2.3. Guo’s Scheme

The pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann model with Guo’s force scheme [14] can be shown as follows:with .

The density and flow velocity can be obtained by the following [24]:

##### 2.4. MED Scheme

The pseudopotential lattice Boltzmann model with MED force scheme [8] can be shown as follows:with .

The density and flow velocity can be obtained by

#### 3. Carnahan-Starling Equation of State (C-S EOS)

In order to get relatively large density ratio, the Carnahan-Starling Equation of State (C-S EOS) is used in the present study [25]:in which , , and and can be obtained bywhere , , are used in the present study.

#### 4. Application Cases

##### 4.1. Two-Phase Separation

In this section, two-phase separation will be used to test four schemes of Shan-Chen, EDM, MED, and Guo. The force term can be calculated by the following:where is weights and, for D2Q9 model, , , .

In the present work, the interaction potential is defined according to the method by Chen et al. [26] as follows:

In computation, , 101 × 101 grids have been used; the periodic boundary conditions are used for all boundaries. The initial density for whole area is critical density, and a random density fluctuation of plus or minus 1% is added at the beginning for whole area. When the computation gets to equilibrium, gas and liquid phases will separate clearly. The simulated results are shown in Figure 1.