Review Article

Social Spider Optimization Algorithm: Modifications, Applications, and Perspectives

Table 6

Comparison results among four different clustering data sets.

ā€‰ā€‰k-meansABCCLSPSODEFPASSOSMSSO

AD1Best1747.38591755.26371878.59021718.45621938.50001718.28481718.2537
Med1991.93511882.20132870.89682007.60002161.00001418.28481718.2537
STD3.4229E+021.0475E+025.5367E+023.3982E+021.4448E+022.3328E-130E+00

AD2Best525.5957515.2971513.9034513.9036520.4449514.0804513.9034
Med694.4421517.9773658.2596514.3841536.4305514.0804513.9034
STD1.9148E+021.8902E+001.8287E+021.9550E+011.2070E+010E+001.1664E-13

IrisBest97.190197.000196.658196.656197.909796.984896.6555
Med100.886697.9254108.470897.1050100.067396.984896.6555
STD8.7805E+009.7925E+011.4706E+013.6310E-011.7105E+002.4580E-141.9160E-14

TAEBest1504.95351495.75901493.93861492.10001493.60001525.73491490.9258
Med1529.64061500.15441527.64831518.80001498.80001525.73491490.9258
STD2.9749E+014.7872E+002.8105E+011.9777E+013.1373E+004.6656E-133.6656E-13