Research Article
A New Hybrid Decision Making Approach for Housing Suitability Mapping of an Urban Area
Table 4
Differences between CMA-ES and FDEMATEL models.
| Name | WLC Suitability Value for CMA-ES | WLC Suitability Value for FDEMATEL | Difference |
| 1014-08 | 0.25 | 0.42 | -0.17 | 1014-07 | 0.18 | 0.37 | -0.19 | 1014-06 | 0.21 | 0.41 | -0.20 | 1014-05 | 0.21 | 0.39 | -0.18 | … | … | … | … | 1024-09 | 0.77 | 0.44 | 0.33 | 1024-12 | 0.83 | 0.51 | 0.32 | 1003-14 | 0.23 | 0.53 | -0.30 | 1003-19 | 0.27 | 0.52 | -0.25 |
| FDEMATEL performance (negative value) | 56 (35%) |
| CMA-ES performance (Positive value) | | | 104 (65 %) |
|
|